DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diagnosis of Subclinical Mastitis-Causing Pathogens Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in a Certified Organic Dairy Farm in Korea

  • Sung Jae Kim (Department of Companion Animal Health, Kyungbok University) ;
  • Hyun-Tae Kim (Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Yo-Han Kim (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2023.11.17
  • Accepted : 2023.11.28
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

We identified mastitis-causing pathogens using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) in an organic dairy farm and evaluated the effects of antimicrobial restriction on antimicrobial susceptibility. A total of 43 Holstein cows without any clinical sign of mastitis were used in this study, and 172 quarter milk samples were cultured on blood agar plates for 24 hours at 37℃. Subsequently, bacterial species were identified and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed. The subclinical mastitis infection rates in the cows and quarters were 58.1% (25/43) and 25.6% (44/172), respectively. In the species identification, Staphylococcus aureus (40.9%) was the most prominent isolate, followed by S. chromogenes (22.7%), S. epidermis (18.2%), S. simulans (11.4%), S. haemolyticus (2.3%), S. muscae (2.3%), and S. xylosus (2.3%). In the antimicrobial susceptibility test, all isolates were 100% susceptible to 24 of 28 antibiotics, except for benzylpenicillin, cefalotin, cefpodoxime, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The resistance rates of S. aureus, S. chromogenes, and S. muscae isolates to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were 27.8%, 10%, and 100%, respectively, and the resistance rates of S. epidermis and S. xylosus to benzylpenicillin were 50% and 100%, respectively. S. chromogenes, S. epidermis, S. simulans, S. haemolyticus, and S. xylosus were resistant to cefalotin and cefpodoxime. In conclusion, restrictions on antimicrobial use for organic dairy farm certification have resulted in a high Staphylococcus spp. infection rate. Therefore, our study indicates the importance of mastitis management strategies implemented by farmers together with veterinary practitioners, even if mastitis does not appear clinically in organic dairy farms.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by 2022 Research Grant from Kangwon National University.

References

  1. Barreiro JR, Ferreira CR, Sanvido GB, Kostrzewa M, Maier T, Wegemann B, et al. Short communication: identification of subclinical cow mastitis pathogens in milk by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 5661-5667. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3614
  2. Cicconi-Hogan KM, Gamroth M, Richert R, Ruegg PL, Stiglbauer KE, Schukken YH. Associations of risk factors with somatic cell count in bulk tank milk on organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 3689-3702. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6271
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). CLSI Document VET08. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility test for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard. 4th ed. Wayne: CLSI. 2018.
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Supplement M100. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 29th ed. Wayne: CLSI. 2018.
  5. de Assis Oliveira TC, Brito MAVP, Giambiagi-de Marval M, Vicentini NM, Lange CC. Identification of bovine mastitis pathogens using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Brazil. J Dairy Res 2021; 88: 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029921000595
  6. Levison LJ, Miller-Cushon EK, Tucker AL, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, Barkema HW, et al. Incidence rate of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on conventional and organic Canadian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 1341-1350. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9809
  7. National Mastitis Council. Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. Madison: National Mastitis Council. 1999: 153.
  8. Ngassam Tchamba C, Rao AS, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Duprez JN, Theron L, et al. Comparison of quantitative PCR and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry assays for identification of bacteria in milk samples from cows with subclinical mastitis. J Appl Microbiol 2019; 127: 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14358
  9. Nonnemann B, Lyhs U, Svennesen L, Kristensen KA, Klaas IC, Pedersen K. Bovine mastitis bacteria resolved by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102: 2515-2524. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15424
  10. Persson Y, Nyman AK, Gronlund-Andersson U. Etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of udder pathogens from cases of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand 2011; 53: 36.
  11. Pol M, Ruegg PL. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 249-261. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72626-7
  12. Sharma N, Singh NK, Bhadwal MS. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2011; 24: 429-438. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10233