Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Ways to Improve Catalog Enriched Content Services in Domestic Public Libraries

국내 공공도서관의 목록 보강콘텐츠 서비스 개선방안에 관한 연구

  • 주소현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이수상 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.21
  • Accepted : 2023.12.11
  • Published : 2023.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive implications through a comparison of the current status of catalog enriched content services provision in U.S. public libraries and domestic public libraries. In addition, we are seeking ways to improve the catalog enriched content services for domestic public libraries in the future. From early September to mid-October 2023, specific books were searched on public library websites in the U.S. and Korea, and the functions of the enriched content services shown in the search results were compared. The results are as follows: First, domestic public library enriched content services require a separate company to develop and provide an enriched content services solution. Second, the enriched content services platform must discover domestic information sources that can be utilized in the areas of book-centered, book recommendation, and community engagement. Third, it is necessary to develop enriched content using public data such as the Library Information Naru. Fourth, each integrated library must that data generated from local community engagement services can be utilized as an enriced content service.

이 연구의 목적은 미국 공공도서관과 국내 공공도서관의 목록 보강콘텐츠 서비스 제공 현황 비교를 통하여 시사점을 도출하고 향후 국내 공공도서관을 위한 목록 보강콘텐츠 서비스에 대한 개선방안을 모색하는 것이다. 2023년 9월 초부터 10월 중순까지 미국과 국내 공공도서관 홈페이지에서 특정 도서를 검색한 후, 검색결과에 나타난 보강콘텐츠 서비스 기능을 비교하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 국내 공공도서관 보강콘텐츠 서비스는 별도의 업체에서 보강콘텐츠 서비스 솔루션을 개발 후, 제공하는 방식이 필요하다. 둘째, 보강콘텐츠 서비스 솔루션은 도서중심정보, 도서추천정보, 이용자참여정보 영역에서 활용할 수 있는 국내 정보원을 발굴해야 한다. 셋째, 도서관정보 나루와 같은 공공데이터를 활용한 보강콘텐츠 개발이 필요하다. 넷째, 각 통합도서관은 지역커뮤니티 참여 서비스에서 생성되는 데이터를 보강콘텐츠 서비스로 활용할 수 있도록 해야 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 과제는 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Doh, Tae-Hyeon & Jung, Young-Mi (2013). A study on the next generation OPAC functionalities diffusion status and adoption by academic libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2), 197-215.
  2. Kwak, Seung-Jin, Shin, Jae-Min, & Kim, Bo-Young (2016). Comparative study of discovery services. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2016.27.4.005
  3. Kim, Seong-Hee (2020). Analysis of relative importance on evaluation elements of library discovery. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(2), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.399
  4. Lee, Eun-Ju (2014). A study on quality evaluation of discovery central index: the case of EDS(EDSCO Discovery Service). Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(3), 415-440. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.3.201409.415
  5. Lee, Soo-Sang (2023). A study on the characteristics of integrated search services in public libraries in Korea: focusing on the integrated libraries of local autonomous entities of Seoul City. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 40(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2023.40.3.001
  6. Lee, Yeon-OK (2023). An analysis of online readers' advisory services offered by public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.54.2.202306.155
  7. Rho, Jee-Hyun, Lee, Mi-Hwa, & Lee, Eun-Ju (2023). Cataloging Theory and Practice. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  8. Yoon, Cheong-Ok (2012). A study on the user-contributed reviews for the next generation library catalogs. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.115
  9. Yoon, Cheong-Ok (2013). An analysis on the functions of the next generation library catalog: with a focus on Search Works. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.005
  10. Yoon, Cheong-Ok (2019). A study on the enriched contents of OPACs of public libraries in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.4.201912.181
  11. ALA (2002). CHOICE Reviews available through Baker & Taylor's Content Cafe. Available: https://www.ala.org/news/news/pressreleases2002/choicereviews
  12. Altmetric (2023). Altmetric for Books. Available: https://www.altmetric.com/solutions/altmetric-books/
  13. Baker-Taylor (2023). ABOUT. Available: https://www.baker-taylor.com/about-us
  14. Bates, M. J. (2003). Task force recommendation 2.3 research and design review: Improving user access to library catalogs and portal information (Final Report Version 3). http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/2.3BatesReport6-03.doc.pdf
  15. Bibliocommons (2023a). A better online catalog was just the beginning. Available: https://www.bibliocommons.com/our-story
  16. Bibliocommons (2023b). BiblioCore. Available: https://www.bibliocommons.com/solutions/bibliocore
  17. Bowker (2021). About the Data. Available: https://bowkerbookdata.proquest.com/about
  18. Breeding, M. (2015). Library Services Platforms: A Maturing Genre of Products. ALA
  19. Breeding, M. (2016). ProQuest Expands Strategy for Catalog Enrichment. Smart Libraries Newsletter, 36(12), 2-3.
  20. Breeding, M. (2020). Smart Libraries Q&A: Differences between ILS and LSP. Smart Libraries Newsletter, 40(10), 3-4.
  21. Breeding, M. (2022a). Public Libraries in the United States. Available: https://librarytechnology.org/libraries/uspublic/
  22. Breeding, M. (2022b). Expanding Content Options Mean New Challenges to Libraries. Computers in Libraries, 42(8), https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A723635881/AONE?u=keris204&sid=bookmarkAONE&xid=746b0a3c
  23. Buczynski, J.A. (2006) New Metadata Expectations. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11:1, 107-111, DOI: 10.1300/J136v11n01_09
  24. Chilifresh (2023). About ChiliFresh. Available: https://chilifresh.com/about
  25. DaSilva, A. (2014). Enriching discovery layers: a product comparison of content enrichment services Syndetic Solutions and Content Cafe 2. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v9i2.2816
  26. Faiks, A., Radermacher, A., & Sheehan, A. (2007). What about the book? Google-izing the catalog with tables of contents. Library Philosophy and Practice, NA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A166433130/AONE?u=keris204&sid=bookmarkAONE&xid=64e94db6
  27. Goodreads (2023). About Goodreads. Available: https://www.goodreads.com/about/us
  28. Jetty, S., JohnPaulAnbu, K., Jain, P. K., & Hopkinson, A. (2011). OPAC 2.0: towards the next generation of online library catalogues.
  29. Kalilur Rahman, H. & Dominice, J. (2012). An analytical study of online public access catalogues in comparison with features of Amazon and Google: a checklist approach. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2012.2.1.37
  30. Library & Information Science Community (2023). Library Automation. LIS EDUCATION NETWORK. https://www.lisedunetwork.com/library-automation
  31. LibraryThing (2023a). Introducing Syndetics Unbound. Available: https://thingology.librarything.com/2016/10/introducing-syndetics-unbound/
  32. LibraryThing (2023b). The Lexile Framework® for Reading. Available: https://www.librarything.com/lexile/
  33. Madarash-Hill, C. & Hill, J. B. (2005). Electronically enriched enhancements in catalog records: a use study of books described on records with URL enhancements versus those without. Technical Services Quarterly, 23:2, 19-31, DOI: 10.1300/J124v23n02_02
  34. Markey, K. (2007). The online library catalog: paradise lost and paradise regained? D-Lib Magazine, 13(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/markey/01markey.html
  35. Mi, J. & Weng, C. (2008). Revitalizing the library OPAC: interface, searching, and display challenges. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(1), 5-22.
  36. NoveList (2023a). NoveList Select. Available: https://www.ebsco.com/novelist/products/novelist-select
  37. NoveList (2023b). NoveList Introduces New Features and Options into NoveList SelectTM, for Customers Incorporating NoveList Content into Their Library Catalogs. Available: https://www.ebsco.com/news-center/press-releases/novelist-introduces-new-features-and-options-novelist-selecttm-customers
  38. Pallab, P. (2019). Library Services Platform (LSP): An Overview. 26. 12-22. 
  39. Reading group guides (2023). About Us. Available: https://www.readinggroupguides.com/about-us
  40. Tosaka, Y. & Weng, C. (2011). Reexamining Content-Enriched Access: Its Effect on Usage and Discovery. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 412-427. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-137
  41. Trainor, C. (2009). Open Source, Crowd Source: Harnessing the Power of the People behind Our Libraries. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 43(3), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330910978581
  42. University of Pittsburgh Library System (2023). Altmetrics. Available: https://pitt.libguides.com/altmetrics
  43. Wu, S. & Houghtaling, E. (2016). Studying Bibliographic Enhancement Data for Library Catalogs.