과제정보
이 논문은 2023년 교육부의 춘천교육대학교 국립대학 육성사업 사업비 지원을 받아 작성되었음.
참고문헌
- Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
- Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49(25), 1804-1807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804
- Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. A necessary unity. E. P. Dutton.
- Born, M. (1951). The restless universe. Dover Publications, Inc.
- Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639-669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
- Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998). Explanation in scientists and children. Minds and Machines, 8, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008242619231
- Brigandt, I. (2016). Why the difference between explanation and argument matters to science education. Science & Education, 25(3-4), 251-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9826-6
- Cartwright, N. (1980). The truth doesn't explain much. American Philosophical Quarterly, 17(2), 159-163.
- Chang, J., Park, J., & Park, J. (2023). Analysis of scientific explanations and the affordances constructed in gifted elementary students' science drawings and science writings about air pressure: Pedagogical use of multimodal representations. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 42(1), 161-177.
- Choi, H.-C. (2011). A study on Van Fraassen's pragmatism of explanation. CHULHAK-RONCHONG, Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association, 66(4), pp. 403-419.
- Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., ... & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
- De Andrade, V., Freire, S., & Baptista, M. (2019). Constructing scientific explanations: A system of analysis for students' explanations. Research in Science Education, 49, 787-807.
- Douglas, H. E. (2009). Reintroducing prediction to explanation. Philosophy of Science, 76(4), 444-463. https://doi.org/10.1086/648111
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(2), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
- Einstein A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum mechanical desertion of physical reality be considered? Physical Review, 47, 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
- Alameh, S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Brown, D. (2023). The nature of scientific explanation: Examining the perceptions of the nature, quality, and "goodness" of explanation among college students, science teachers, and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(1), 100-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21792
- Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 193-208). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Hanson, N. R. (1961). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge University Press.
- Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. In C. Hempel (Ed.), Aspects of scientific explanation, and other essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 331-489). Free Press.
- Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic og explanation. Philosophy of Science, XV, 135-175. https://doi.org/10.1086/286983
- Hoefer, C. (2023). Causal determinism, In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/determinism-causal/
- Hofstadter, A. (1951). Explanation and necessity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11, 339-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2103538
- Hong, S., & Chang, H.-W. (2010). Laboratory and creativity: The role of the leader and laboratory culture. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10(1), 27-71.
- Jeon, S. (2014). A comparison analysis of scientific communication skills between gifted students and general students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(1), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.1.149
- Jo, K.-H. (2015). Comparison of verbs in the contents of the national curriculum for elementary and middle school science: Focused on the 7th, 2007, and 2009 Revision. Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2015.39.2.239
- Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., & Parker, D. (2016). An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144
- Kim, M., & Yoon, H.-G. (2016). Scientific reasoning & argumentation. Kyoyookbook.
- Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2013). Students explaining science-assessment of science communication competence. Research in Science Education, 43, 2235-2256.
- Kwon, Y. -J., Jeong, J. -S., Kang, M. -J., & Kim, Y. -S. (2003). A grounded theory on the process of generating hypothesis - Knowledge about scientific episodes. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 23(5), 458-469.
- Lakatos, I. (1994). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall and G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers. Vol. 1 (pp. 8-101). Cambridge University Press.
- Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and development of thinking. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
- Lee, H. -J., & Shim, K. C. (2012). Analysis of writing characteristics of scientifically gifted students by explaining cell. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.1.141
- Martin, J. R. (1970). Explaining, understanding and teaching. McGraw Hill.
- Martin, M. (1972). Concepts of science education: A philosophical analysis. Scott, Foreman and Company.
- Ministry of Education (2022). Science curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
- NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535-563.
- Oh, P. S. (2020). An exploration of narrative explanation as a type of scientific explanation - Based on textbook explanations of El Lino -. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 10(1), 13-24.
- Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction?. Science Education, 95(4), 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20438
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
- Palmer, D. (1995). The POE in the primary school: An evaluation. Research in Science Education, 25, 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357405
- Park, C. (2021). The effects of causal question strategy on hypothesis generation in chemical Inquiry: From the scientific knowledge perspective and the developmental perspective. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University.
- Park, J. & Han, S. (2002). Using deductive reasoning to promote the change of students' conceptions about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074026
- Park, J. (2006). Modelling analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 469-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500404540
- Park, S. -B. (2007). A Study on narrative explanation in science. CHUL HAK SA SANG - Journal of Philosophical Ideas, 24, 399-416.
- Peirce, C. S. (1998). The nature of meaning: the sixth lecture on 7 May 1903. In the Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Pierce: Selected philosophical writings. Vol. 2(1893-1913) (pp. 208-225). Indiana University Press.
- Quinn, M. E., & George, K. D. (1975). Teaching hypothesis formation. Science Education, 59, 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730590303
- Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and explanation. Oxford University Press.
- Salmon, W. C. (2006). Four decades of scientific explanation. University of Pittsburgh press.
- Schrodinger, E. (1935). Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics). Naturwissenschaften. 23(48), 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491891
- Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0201-4
- Van Fraassen, B. (1988). The pragmatic theory of explanation. In J. Pitt (Ed.), Theories of explanation. (pp. 136-155), Oxford University Press.
- Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
- Wenham, M. (1993). The nature and role of hypotheses in school investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150301
- Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Constructing a scientific explanation-A narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902-1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.880527