DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of Problems with Use of Halogenated Cleaning Solvents Revealed through Case Studies of Cleaning Solvent Poisoning and Analysis of Domestic and Overseas Regulations

세척제 용매 중독 사례와 국내·외 규제 검토를 통한 할로겐화 용매 세척제 사용의 문제점 고찰

  • Naroo Lee (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute(OSHRI), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA)) ;
  • Hye Jin Lee (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute(OSHRI), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA)) ;
  • Sujin Jeong (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute(OSHRI), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA)) ;
  • Dohee Lee (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute(OSHRI), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA)) ;
  • Arom Shin (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute(OSHRI), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA))
  • 이나루 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 이혜진 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 정수진 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 이도희 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 신아롬 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2023.11.30
  • Accepted : 2023.12.25
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

Objectives: We examine cases of chemical poisoning that occurred in the cleaning of metal parts and the regulations on halogenated solvents in other countries and propose regulations necessary to prevent chemical poisoning from halogenated solvents. Methods: We collected cases of chemical poisoning through the website of the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. A review of the literature was conducted focusing on regulations related to halogenated solvents in the United States and the European Union, particularly for cleaning metal parts. Among the Material Safety Data Sheets submitted to the government, MSDS containing eleven substances were extracted to confirm the composition and product use. We investigated cleaning methods for metal parts used in South Korea. For the hazard classification, the European Chemicals Agency or Japan's NITE's website was used. Results: In the case of poisoning, the cleaning methods involving trichloromethane were dipping and dry, which was not found in the literature. It was confirmed that many halogenated solvents and dimethyl carbonate were used for metal cleaning in South Korea. In vapor degreasing using TCE in the USA, even if the facility is strictly managed, such as by installing cooling coils in open cleaning facilities, the risk of exposure to TCE is considered to be not only carcinogenic but also a concern for acute and chronic effects. In comparison, exposure through Korean work methods such as dipping and drying operations is inevitably much higher. Conclusions: The transition to water-based cleaning with low-hazard chemicals should be a priority in the cleaning process. In the case of metal parts that require precise cleaning, if the use of a halogenated solvent is inevitable, a closed degreasing facility should be used to minimize exposure. The current regulations in the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Chemical Substances Control Act, and the Air Environment Conservation Act do not require cleaning facilities to minimize emissions. To protect the health of workers using halogenated solvents to clean metal parts, regulations that require a fundamental reduction in exposure will be necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersson I, Slunge D. Substitution of trichloroethylene in metal parts cleaning in the European Union : A survey-based study on the effects of the authorization requirements in REACH. University of Gothenburg; 2021
  2. Bae JH. Alternative cleaning agents and alternative cleaning technologies for replacing CFC. Prospective Ind CHem 2006;8(2):25-40
  3. Choi YE, Kim SB, Kim W, Cho JH, Lee KT et al. Impact analysis and improvement plan arrangement of regulation changes for industrial cleaning substances: Focused on halogenated solvent cleaners. Occupational Safety and Health Reseach Institute; 2022
  4. Chung CK, Koo HJ. Application of the clean technology in the metal cleaning process. Clean technology. 1997;3(2):57-73
  5. Doherty RE. A history of the production and use of carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene and 1,1,1,-trichloroethane in the United States: Part1 - Historical background: carbon tetrachloride and tetrachloroethylene, Environmental Forensics 2000a;1(2):69-81, DOI:10.1006/enfo.2000.0010
  6. Doherty RE. A history of the production and use of carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene and 1,1,1,-trichloroethane in the United States: Par t2 - Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1,-trichloroethane. Environmental Forensics 2000b;1(2):83-93, DOI:10.1006/enfo.2000.0011
  7. European Chlorinated Solvent Association(ECSA). Guidance on storage and handling of chlorinated solvents; 2011
  8. European Committee for Standardization(CEN). BS EN12921-4:2005+A1:2008-Machines for surface cleaning and pretreatment of industrial items using liquids or vapors-Part 4: Safety of machines using halogenated solvent
  9. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Fact sheet : Halogenated solvent cleaning machine NESHAP; 2015 Available from: URL: https://epa.govs/
  10. Federal Register. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR part 751. [EPA-HQ-OPRT-2016-0387;FRL-9950-08] Trichloroethylene; Regulation of use in vapor degreasing under TSCA section 6(a). 2017;82(12):7432-7460
  11. Federal Register. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR part 751. [EPA-HQ-OPRT-2020-0642;FRL-8317-01-OCSPP] Trichloroethylene; Regulation of use in vapor degreasing under TSCA section 6(a). 2023;88(209):74712-74794
  12. Health and Safety Executive(HSE). Dichloromethane (DCM0-Advice for managers); 2021. Available from: URL: https://hse.gov.uk/
  13. International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans Volume 110; Some chemicals used as solvents and in polymer manufacture; 2016
  14. Jeong KS, Ahn YS, Kim HS, J YS, Cho SS et al. Cleaner handling condition and health hazard investigation-focus on unregulated cleaners by Occupational Safety and Heatlh Act. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute; 2018
  15. Jeong SJ, Bae GW, Lee NR. Comparative study of korean workers' expoure to dichloromethane by process category between work environment monitoring and ECETTOC TRA. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2021;31(4):317-330
  16. Jung DC, Lee CH, Kong SD, M GY, Lee SW. The optimum clean process of non-aquous alternative solvents for 1,1,1-TCE. J of Korean Oil Chemists Soc. 1999;16(3):1-4
  17. Kanegsberg B, Kanegsberg E. Handbook for critical cleaning, 2nd edition. CRC press; 2017
  18. Kim W, Kim SB, Jo JH, Choi IJ, K TS. Institutionalizaton strategy for restriction of hazardous chemicals in Occupational Safety and Health Act. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute; 2020
  19. Kim HA, Kim SG, Uh WS, Lee CG, Kim SB et al. Research study on the current status of distribution and management of chemicals that cause acute poisoning in workplaces. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute; 2016
  20. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA). Alert on occurrence of acute poisoning in cleaning process; 2022
  21. Morrison RD, Murphy BL. Chlorinated solvents: A forensic evaluation. RSC Publishing; 2013
  22. NITE(Incorporated Administrative Agency National Institue of Technology and Evaluation); 2023 Available from http://nite.go.jp
  23. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute (OSHRI). MSDS summary review results related acute chemical poisoning investigation(Internal report); 2022
  24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Emission scenario document on the use of vapour degreasers. series on emission scenario document No.41. ENV/CBC/MONO(2021) 40; 2021
  25. Wolf K. Safer alternatives to vapor degreasing; 2020 Available from: URL: https://epa.govs/