Animal Bioscience

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.295-306
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of p38 inhibitor on the proliferation of chicken muscle stem cells and differentiation into muscle and fat

  • Minkyung, Ryu (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Minsu, Kim (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hyun Young, Jung (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho Hyun, Kim (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cheorun, Jo (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.26
  • 심사 : 2022.07.04
  • 발행 : 2023.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Inhibiting the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway delays differentiation and increases proliferation of muscle stem cells in most species. Here, we aimed to investigate the effect of p38 inhibitor (p38i) treatment on the proliferation and differentiation of chicken muscle stem cells. Methods: Chicken muscle stem cells were collected from the muscle tissues of Hy-line Brown chicken embryos at embryonic day 18, then isolated by the preplating method. Cells were cultured for 4 days in growth medium supplemented with dimethyl sulfoxide or 1, 10, 20 μM of p38i, then subcultured for up to 4 passages. Differentiation was induced for 3 days with differentiation medium. Each treatment was replicated 3 times. Results: The proliferation and mRNA expression of paired box 7 gene and myogenic factor 5 gene, as well as the mRNA expression of myogenic differentiation marker gene myogenin were significantly higher in p38i-treated cultures than in control (p<0.05), but immunofluorescence staining and mRNA expression of myosin heavy chain (MHC) were not significantly different between the two groups. Oil red O staining of accumulated lipid droplets in differentiated cell cultures revealed a higher lipid density in p38i-treated cultures than in control; however, the expression of the adipogenic marker gene peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: p38 inhibition in chicken muscle stem cells improves cell proliferation, but the effects on myogenic differentiation and lipid accumulation require additional analysis. Further studies are needed on the chicken p38-MAPK pathway to understand the muscle and fat development mechanism.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT, 20012411) and partially from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (2022R1A2C1005235).

참고문헌

  1. Ramani S, Ko D, Kim B, et al. Technical requirements for cultured meat production: a review. J Anim Sci Technol 2021;63:681-92. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e45
  2. Lee HJ, Yong HI, Kim M, Choi Y-S, Jo C. Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market-a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2020;33:1533-43. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0419
  3. Choi KH, Yoon JW, Kim M, et al. Muscle stem cell isolation and in vitro culture for meat production: a methodological review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2021;20:429-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12661
  4. Reiss J, Robertson S, Suzuki M. Cell sources for cultivated meat: Applications and considerations throughout the production workflow. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:7513. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147513
  5. Choi KH, Kim M, Yoon JW, et al. Purification of pig muscle stem cells using magnetic-activated cell sorting (macs) based on the expression of cluster of differentiation 29 (cd29). Food Sci Anim Resour 2020;40:852-9. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e51
  6. Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 2007;129:999-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044
  7. Cooper RN, Tajbakhsh S, Mouly V, Cossu G, Buckingham M, Butler-Browne GS. In vivo satellite cell activation via myf5 and myod in regenerating mouse skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci 1999;112:2895-901. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.112.17.2895
  8. Halevy O, Piestun Y, Allouh MZ, et al. Pattern of pax7 expression during myogenesis in the posthatch chicken establishes a model for satellite cell differentiation and renewal. Dev Dyn 2004;231:489-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20151
  9. Yablonka-Reuveni Z, Paterson BM. Myod and myogenin expression patterns in cultures of fetal and adult chicken myoblasts. J Histochem Cytochem 2001;49:455-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540104900405
  10. Choi K-H, Yoon JW, Kim M, et al. Optimization of culture conditions for maintaining pig muscle stem cells in vitro. Food Sci Anim Resour 2020;40:659-67. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e39
  11. Ding S, Swennen GNM, Messmer T, et al. Maintaining bovine satellite cells stemness through p38 pathway. Sci Rep 2018;8:10808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28746-7
  12. Seale P, Sabourin LA, Girgis-Gabardo A, Mansouri A, Gruss P, Rudnicki MA. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 2000;102:777-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00066-0
  13. Yeow K, Cabane C, Turchi L, Ponzio G, Derijard B. Increased mapk signaling during in vitro muscle wounding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;293:112-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00190-0
  14. Iwasa H, Han J, Ishikawa F. Mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 defines the common senescence-signalling pathway. Genes Cells 2003;8:131-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00620.x
  15. Collinsworth AM, Torgan CE, Nagda SN, Rajalingam RJ, Kraus WE, Truskey GA. Orientation and length of mammalian skeletal myocytes in response to a unidirectional stretch. Cell Tissue Res 2000;302:243-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004410000224
  16. King DB, Entrikin RK. Thyroidal involvement in the expression of avian muscular dystrophy. Life Sci 1991;48:909-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(91)90038-D
  17. Russell BRENDA, Dix DJ, Haller DL, Jacobs-El JAMIL. Repair of injured skeletal muscle: a molecular approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:189-96. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199202000-00006
  18. Joubert R, Metayer-Coustard S, Crochet S, et al. Regulation of the expression of the avian uncoupling protein 3 by isoproterenol and fatty acids in chick myoblasts: possible involvement of AMPK and PPARα? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011;301:R201-8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00087.2010
  19. Wang C, Liu W, Nie Y, et al. Loss of myod promotes fate transdifferentiation of myoblasts into brown adipocytes. EBioMedicine 2017;16:212-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.015
  20. Wang YX, Dumont NA, Rudnicki MA. Muscle stem cells at a glance. J Cell Sci 2014;127:4543-8. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.151209
  21. Ding S, Wang F, Liu Y, Li S, Zhou G, Hu P. Characterization and isolation of highly purified porcine satellite cells. Cell Death Discov 2017;3:17003. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.3
  22. Day K, Paterson B, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. A distinct profile of myogenic regulatory factor detection within pax7+ cells at s phase supports a unique role of myf5 during posthatch chicken myogenesis. Dev Dyn 2009;238:1001-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21903
  23. von Maltzahn J, Jones AE, Parks RJ, Rudnicki MA. Pax7 is critical for the normal function of satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013;110:16474-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307680110
  24. Schmidt M, Schuler SC, Huttner SS, von Eyss B, von Maltzahn J. Adult stem cells at work: Regenerating skeletal muscle. Cell Mol Life Sci 2019;76:2559-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03093-6
  25. Perdiguero E, Ruiz-Bonilla V, Gresh L, et al. Genetic analysis of p38 MAP kinases in myogenesis: fundamental role of p38α in abrogating myoblast proliferation. EMBO J 2007; 26:1245-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601587
  26. Rando TA, Blau HM. Primary mouse myoblast purification, characterization, and transplantation for cell-mediated gene therapy. J Cell Biol 1994;125:1275-87. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.125.6.1275
  27. Bai C, Hou L, Li F, He X, Zhang M, Guan W. Isolation and biological characteristics of beijing fatty chicken skeletal muscle satellite cells. Cell Commun Adhes 2012;19:69-77. https://doi.org/10.3109/15419061.2012.743998
  28. Balaban J, Wierzbicki M, Zielinska M, et al. Effects of graphene oxide nanofilm and chicken embryo muscle extract on muscle progenitor cell differentiation and contraction. Molecules 2020;25:1991. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081991
  29. Kocaefe Y, Israeli D, Ozguc M, Danos O, Garcia L. Myogenic program induction in mature fat tissue (with myod expression). Exp Cell Res 2005;308:300-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.03.038
  30. Qi R, Liu H, Wang Q, et al. Expressions and regulatory effects of p38/erk/jnk mapks in the adipogenic trans-differentiation of c2c12 myoblasts. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;44:2467-75. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486169
  31. Yamanouchi K, Nakamura K, Takeuchi S, Hosoyama T, Matsuwaki T, Nishihara M. Suppression of myod induces spontaneous adipogenesis in skeletal muscle progenitor cell culture. Anim Sci J 2021;92:e13573. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13573
  32. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.143
  33. Beier JP, Bitto FF, Lange C, et al. Myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells co-cultured with primary myoblasts. Cell Biol Int 2011;35:397-406. https://doi.org/10.1042/CBI20100417