DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization of Designing Barrier to Mitigate Hazardous Area in Hydrogen Refueling Stations

수소충전소 폭발위험장소 완화를 위한 확산차단벽 최적화 설계

  • SEUNGHYO AN (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • SEHYEON OH (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • EUNHEE KIM (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • JUNSEO LEE (Center for Process Innovation Simulation, Chonnam National University) ;
  • BYUNGCHOL MA (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • 안승효 (전남대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 오세현 (전남대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 김은희 (전남대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 이준서 (전남대학교 공정혁신 시뮬레이션센터) ;
  • 마병철 (전남대학교 화학공학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.07
  • Accepted : 2023.12.15
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

Hydrogen emphasis on safety management due to its high potential for accidents from wide explosive limits and low ignition energy. To prevent accidents, appropriate explosion-proof electrical equipment with installed to safe management of ignition sources. However, designing all facilities with explosion-proof structures can significantly increase costs and impose limitations. In this study, we optimize the barrier to effectively control the initial momentum in case of hydrogen release and form the control room as a non-hazardous area. We employed response surface method (RSM), the barrier distance, width and height of the barrier were set as variables. The Box-Behnken design method the selection of 15 cases, and FLACS assessed the presence of hazardous area. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis resulting in an optimized barrier area. Through this methodology, the workplace can optimize the barrier according to the actual workplace conditions and classify reasonable hazardous area, which is believed to secure safety in hydrogen facilities and minimize economic burden.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2023년도 환경부(한국화학물질관리협회)의 재원으로 화학물질 안전관리 특성화대학원 사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다(B0080524003046).

References

  1. Y. S. Byun, "A study on safety improvement for mobile hy drogen refueling station by HAZOP analysis", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2021, pp. 299-307, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2021.32.5.299.
  2. H. Kim and S. Kang, "Analysis of damage range and impact of on-site hydrogen fueling station using quantitative risk assessment program (Hy-KoRAM)", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2020, pp. 459-466, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2020.31.5.459.
  3. Kang and D. Lee, "Risk assessment for performance evaluation system of hydrogen refueling station", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2022, pp. 232-239, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2022.33.3.232.
  4. J. G. Lee, "A study on the determination of explosion hazardous distance due to the hydrogen leakage from packaged reformer using CFD [Master's thisis]", Busan: Pukyong National University; 2022
  5. Korean Industrial Standards Council, "IEC 60079-15, explosive atmospheres - Part 15: equipment protection by type of protection "n"", Korean Standards & Certification, 2019. Retrieved from https://standard.go.kr/KSCI/standardIntro/getStandardSearchList.do?menuId=919&topMenuId=502&upperMenuId=503.
  6. Y. J. Jung and C. J. Lee, "A study on predictive models based on the machine learning for evaluating the extent of hazardous zone of explosive gases", Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2020, pp. 248-256, doi: https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2020.58.2.248.
  7. Y. L. Liu, J. Y. Zheng, P. Xu, Y. Z. Zhao, H. Y. Bie, H. G. Chen, and H. Dryver, "Numerical simulation on the diffusion of hydrogen due to high pressured storage tanks failure", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2009, pp. 265-270, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.06.007.
  8. K. Liu, J. Jiang, C. He, and S. Lin, "Numerical analysis of the diffusion and explosion characteristics of hydrogen-air clouds in a plateau hydrogen refuelling station", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 48, No. 100, 2023, pp. 40101-40116, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.155.
  9. Q. Gao, X. Qu, W. Peng, P. Zhang, and S. Chen, "Influence of obstacle morphology on safety of nuclear hydrogen production system", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 47, No. 86, 2022, pp. 36733-36748, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.235.
  10. Y. Tian, X. Zhang, M. Shan, M. Qi, C. M. Shu, B. Li, and Y. Liu, "Methodology for optimally designing firewalls in hydrogen refueling stations", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 49, Pt. D, 2024, pp. 1196-1209, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.051.
  11. A. V. Tchouvelev, Z. Cheng, V. M. Agranat, and S. V. Zhubrin, "Effectiveness of small barriers as means to reduce clearance distances," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 32, No. 10-11, 2007, pp. 1409-1415, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.020.
  12. E. Kim, J. Park, J. H. Cho, and I. Moon, "Simulation of hydrogen leak and explosion for the safety design of hydrogen fueling station in Korea", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2013, pp. 1737-1743, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.079.
  13. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), "Technical guidelines for selection of worst and alternative accident scenario (P-107-2020)", KOSHA, 2020. https://www.kosha.or.kr/kosha/data/guidanceP.do.
  14. W. Cui, Y. Yuan, L. Tong, and B. Shen, "Numerical simulation of hydrogen leakage diffusion in seaport hydrogen refueling station", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 48, No. 63, 2023, pp. 24521-24535, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.208.
  15. K. Liu, C. He, Y. Yu, C. Guo, S. Lin, and J. Jiang, "A study of hydrogen leak and explosion in different regions of a hydrogen refueling station", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 48, No. 37, 2023, pp. 14112-14126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.267.
  16. J. Mousavi and M. Parvini, "Analyzing effective factors on leakage-induced hydrogen fires", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 40, 2016, pp. 29-42, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.002.
  17. W. H. Chen, M. C. Uribe, E. E. Kwon, K. Y. A. Lin, Y. K. Park, L. Ding, and L. H. Saw, "A comprehensive review of ther moelectric generation optimization by statistical approach: Taguchi method, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and response surface methodology (RSM)", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 169, 2022, pp. 112917, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112917.
  18. S. Amiri, V. Vatanpour, and T. He, "Optimization of effective parameters in arsenite oxidation process with Cl2, H2O2, and O3 using response surface methodology", Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, Vol. 181, 2022, pp. 109167, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.109167.