The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanners: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies

  • Received : 2023.05.26
  • Accepted : 2023.12.15
  • Published : 2023.12.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to investigate whether the accuracy of intraoral scanners is influenced by different scanning strategies in an in vitro setting, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 standard. The following PICOS approach was used: population, tooth impressions; intervention, the use of intraoral scanners with scanning strategies different from the manufacturer's instructions; control, the use of intraoral scanners following the manufacturers' requirements; outcome, accuracy of intraoral scanners; type of studies, in vitro. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases including Embase, SciELO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria were based on in vitro studies that reported the accuracy of digital impressions using intraoral scanners. Analysis was performed using Review Manager software (version 5.3.5; Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Global comparisons were made using a standardized mean difference based on random-effect models, with a significance level of α = 0.05. RESULTS. The meta-analysis included 15 articles. Digital impression accuracy significantly improved under dry conditions (P < 0.001). Moreover, trueness and precision were enhanced when artificial landmarks were used (P ≤ 0.02) and when an S-shaped pattern was followed (P ≤ 0.01). However, the type of light used did not have a significant impact on the accuracy of the digital intraoral scanners (P ≥ 0.16). CONCLUSION. The accuracy of digital intraoral scanners can be enhanced by employing scanning processes using artificial landmarks and digital impressions under dry conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, LC, Xu, ZQ. Innovative 3D dental measurement for tooth model restoration. Key Eng Mater 2005;295: 145-50.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.295-296.145
  2. Park HS, Shah C. Development of high speed and high accuracy 3D dental intra oral scanner. Proced Eng 2015;100:1174-81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.481
  3. Ali A. Accuracy of digital impressions achieved from five different digital impression systems. Dentistry 2015;5:1-6. 
  4. Duret F. Toward a new symbolism in the fabrication of prosthetic design. Cah Prothese 1985;13:65-71. 
  5. Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Ducret M. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng 2017;2017:8427595. 
  6. Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:347-52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.003
  7. ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 1994. 
  8. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56.  https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  9. Atieh MA, Ritter AV, Ko CC, Duqum I. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: a clinical study using a reference appliance. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118:400-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.022
  10. Gan N, Xiong Y, Jiao T. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for whole upper jaws, including full dentitions and palatal soft tissues. PLoS One 2016;11: e0158800. 
  11. Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28. 
  12. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
  13. Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, Oriso K, Kondo H. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:109-13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010
  14. Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CAD/ CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20:1157-66.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041157
  15. Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:375-6.  https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5781
  16. Revilla-Leon M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascon W, Zandinejad A, Ozcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:575-80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.004
  17. Carneiro Pereira AL, Souza Curinga MR, Melo Segundo HV, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A. Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2023;129:855-62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.001
  18. Jivanescu A, Faur AB, Rotar RN. Can dental office lighting intensity conditions influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning? Scanning 2021;2021:9980590. 
  19. Son K, Lee KB. Effect of finish line locations of tooth preparation on the accuracy of intraoral scanners. Int J Comput Dent 2021;24:29-40. 
  20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int Surg J 2021;88:105906-15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
  21. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst rev 2016;5:1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  22. Cakmak G, Donmez MB, Akay C, de Paula MS, Mangano FG, Abou-Ayash S, Yilmaz B. Effect of measurement techniques and operators on measured deviations in digital implant scans. J Dent 2023;130:104388-94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104388
  23. Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, Martinez-Rus F, GarciaOrejas A, Salido MP, Pradies G. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:543-50.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.025
  24. Donmez MB, Marques VR, Cakmak G, Yilmaz H, Schimmel M, Yilmaz B. Congruence between the meshes of a combined healing abutment-scan body system acquired with four different intraoral scanners and the corresponding library file: An in vitro analysis. J Dent 2022;118:103938-45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103938
  25. Elter B, Diker B, Tak O. The trueness of an intraoral scanner in scanning different post space depths. J Dent 2022;127:104352-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104352
  26. Gomez-Polo M, Piedra-Cascon W, Methani MM, Quesada-Olmo N, Farjas-Abadia M, Revilla-Leon M. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. J Dent 2021;110:103690-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103690
  27. Hategan SI, Ionel TF, Goguta L, Gavrilovici A, Negrutiu ML, Jivanescu A. Powder and powder-free intra-oral scanners: digital impression accuracy. Prim Dent J 2018;7:40-3.  https://doi.org/10.1177/205016841800700207
  28. Ioshida M, Munoz BA, Rios H, Cevidanes L, Aristizabal JF, Rey D, Kim-Berman H, Yatabe M, Benavides E, Alvarez MA, Volk S, Ruellas AC. Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model registration with use of the mucogingival junction as the reference. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2019;127:351-60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.003
  29. Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:549-53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
  30. Kim YH, Han SS, Choi YJ, Woo CW. Linear accuracy of full-arch digital models using four different scanning methods: an in vitro study using a coordinate measuring machine. Appl Sci 2020;10:2741-52.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082741
  31. Lee B, Nam NE, Shin SH, Lim JH, Shim JS, Kim JE. Evaluation of the trueness of digital implant impressions according to the implant scan body orientation and scanning method. Appl Sci 2021;11:3027-38.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073027
  32. Marques VR, Cakmak G, Yilmaz H, Abou-Ayash S, Donmez MB, Yilmaz B. Effect of scanned area and operator on the accuracy of dentate arch scans with a single implant. J Clin Med 2022;11:4125-37.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144125
  33. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1461-71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
  34. Park JM. Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:354-62.  https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.354
  35. Park JH, Hwang CJ, Choi YJ, Houschyar KS, Yu JH, Bae SY, Cha JY. Registration of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images using 3-dimensional planning software: Comparison of the accuracy according to scanning methods and software. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:843-51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.013
  36. Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagao V, Neumann M, Street A. Digital impressions' accuracy through "cut-out-rescan" and "data exchange by over scanning" techniques in complete arches of two intraoral scanners and CAD/CAM software. J Prosthodont Res 2022;66: 509-13.  https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00089
  37. Pedroche LO, Bernardes SR, Leao MP, Kintopp CC, Correr GM, Ornaghi BP, Gonzaga CC. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods. Braz Oral Res 2016;30:e113-20.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0113
  38. Pereira ALC, Segundo HVM, Junior LCA, Germano AR, Carreiro ADFP. Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2022;22:279-87.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_108_22
  39. Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Lio F, Papa A, Nardi A, Londono J. Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: an in vitro study. J Dent 2022;119:104072-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072
  40. Ren X, Son K, Lee KB. Accuracy of proximal and occlusal contacts of single implant crowns fabricated using different digital scan methods: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:2843. 
  41. Revilla-Leon M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC. Accuracy of the 3-dimensional virtual patient representation obtained by using 4 different techniques: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2022:S0022-3913(22)00342-0. 
  42. Virard F, Millet C, Bienfait A, Ducret M. Improving digital scans by using a peripheral custom tray: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:173-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.022
  43. Ye J, Wang S, Wang Z, Liu Y, Sun Y, Ye H, Zhou Y. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods. Odontology 2023;111:165-71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00736-2
  44. Zhang YJ, Qiao SC, Qian SJ, Zhang CN, Shi JY, Lai HC. Influence of different factors on the accuracy of digital impressions of multiple implants: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021;36:442-9.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8532
  45. Camci H, Salmanpour F. Effect of saliva isolation and intraoral light levels on performance of intraoral scanners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;158:759-66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.022
  46. Gajbhiye V, Banerjee R, Jaiswal P, Chandak A, Radke U. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;19:173-9.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_285_18
  47. Imburgia M, Kois J, Marino E, Lerner H, Mangano FG. Continuous scan strategy (CSS): a novel technique to improve the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2020;28:128-41. 
  48. Koseoglu M, Kahramanoglu E, Akin H. Evaluating the effect of ambient and scanning lights on the trueness of the intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont 2021;30:811-6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13341
  49. Lim SW, Hwang HS, Cho IS, Baek SH, Cho JH. Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:348-56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.031
  50. Moon YG, Lee KM. Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan. Prog Orthod 2020;21:36. 
  51. Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Thulin M, Nystrom I, Thor A. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. J Dent 2023;128:104308-19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104308
  52. Althubaitiy R, Sambrook R, Weisbloom M, Petridis H. The accuracy of digital implant impressions when using and varying the material and diameter of the dental implant scan bodies. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022;30:305-13. 
  53. Denneulin T, Rignon-Bret C, Ravalec G, Tapie L, Bouter D, Wulfman C. Accuracy of complete-arch implant digital scans: effect of scanning protocol, number of implants, and scan body splinting. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:219-27. 
  54. Fang Y, Fang JH, Jeong SM, Choi BH. A Technique for digital impression and bite registration for a single edentulous arch. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e519-23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12786
  55. Osman RB, Alharbi NM. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2022 Dec 26. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13633. Epub ahead of print. 
  56. Reich S, Yatmaz B, Raith S. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans? J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:89-94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.018
  57. Garikano X, Amezua X, Iturrate M, Solaberrieta E. Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2022:S0022-3913(22)00498-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.014. Epub ahead of print. 
  58. Bratos M, Bergin JM, Rubenstein JE, Sorensen JA. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:232-41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.002
  59. Diker B, Tak O. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:187- 94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.007
  60. Diker B, Tak O. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:299-306.  https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.299
  61. Diker B, Tak O. Accuracy of digital impressions obtained using six intraoral scanners in partially edentulous dentitions and the effect of scanning sequence. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:101-8.  https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6834
  62. Kim MK, Kim JM, Lee YM, Lim YJ, Lee SP. The effect of scanning distance on the accuracy of intra-oral scanners used in dentistry. Clin Anat 2019;32:430-8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23334
  63. Kim EY, Wada J, Sakamoto K, Ishioka Y, Arai Y, Murakami N, Yamazaki T, Hayama H, Utsumi M, Inukai S, Wakabayashi N. Effect of scanning origin location on data accuracy of abutment teeth region in digital impression acquired using intraoral scanner for removable partial denture: a preliminary in vitro study. J Clin Med 2022;11:7392. 
  64. Lopes D, Nishyama R, Steagall Jr W, Tamaki R, Neto PT. Impact of different scan strategies and implant angulation on impression accuracy of full arch multiple implant: an in vitro study. Braz Dent Sci 2022;25: e3006. 
  65. Mandelli F, Gherlone EF, Keeling A, Gastaldi G, Ferrari M. Full-arch intraoral scanning: comparison of two different strategies and their accuracy outcomes. J Osseointegr 2018;10:65-74. 
  66. Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual MA, Camps AI. Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PloS one 2018;13:e0202916. 
  67. Mizumoto RM, Alp G, Ozcan M, Yilmaz B. The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:987-94.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12821
  68. Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016;47:343-9. 
  69. Ochoa-Lopez G, Cascos R, Antonaya-Martin JL, Revilla-Leon M, Gomez-Polo M. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. J Dent 2022;121:104138-46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104138
  70. Oh KC, Park JM, Moon HS. Effects of scanning strategy and scanner type on the accuracy of intraoral scans: A new approach for assessing the accuracy of scanned data. J Prosthodont 2020;29:518-23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13158
  71. Pattamavilai S, Ongthiemsak C. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns. J Prosthet Dent 2022:S0022-3913(22)00046-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.026. Epub ahead of print. 
  72. Rotar RN, Faur AB, Pop D, Jivanescu A. Scanning distance influence on the intraoral scanning accuracy-an in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:3061-8.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093061
  73. Stefanelli LV, Franchina A, Pranno A, Pellegrino G, Ferri A, Pranno N, Di Carlo S, De Angelis F. Use of intraoral scanners for full dental arches: could different strategies or overlapping software affect accuracy? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:9946-59.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199946
  74. Arcuri L, Pozzi A, Lio F, Rompen E, Zechner W, Nardi A. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:128-36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.001
  75. Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21. 
  76. Latham J, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Renne W. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:85-95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.008
  77. Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, Seidt J, Johnston WM. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123:96-104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003
  78. Motel C, Kirchner E, Adler W, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2020;29:309-14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13131
  79. Peroz S, Spies BC, Adali U, Beuer F, Wesemann C. Measured accuracy of intraoral scanners is highly dependent on methodical factors. J Prosthodont Res 2022;66:318-25.  https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00023
  80. Revilla-Leon M, Subramanian SG, Att W, Krishnamurthy VR. Analysis of different illuminance of the room lighting condition on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont 2021; 30:157-62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13276
  81. Wesemann C, Kienbaum H, Thun M, Spies BC, Beuer F, Bumann A. Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans? J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:924-31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.021
  82. Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. Comparison of different intraoral scanning techniques on the completely edentulous maxilla: an in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:762.e1-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.017
  83. Al-Ibrahim I, Keeling A, Osnes C. The effect of operator scanning speed on the trueness and precision of full-arch digital impressions captured in vitro using an intraoral scanner. J Osseoint 2021;13(4 Supplement):S265-70. 
  84. Baek YW, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Effect of custom abutment data superimposition on the accuracy of implant abutment level scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2022:S0022-3913(22)00176-7. 
  85. Cakmak G, Marques VR, Donmez MB, Lu WE, AbouAyash S, Yilmaz B. Comparison of measured deviations in digital implant scans depending on software and operator. J Dent 2022;122:104154. 
  86. Feng CW, Hung CC, Wang JC, Lan TH. Accuracy of different head movements of intraoral scanner in full arch of both maxilla and mandible. Appl Sci 2021;11:8140-52.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178140
  87. Kurz M, Attin T, Mehl A. Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2035-43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1440-5
  88. Revilla-Leon M, Gohil A, Barmak AB, Gomez-Polo M, Perez-Barquero JA, Att W, Kois JC. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2022:S0022-3913(22)00061-0. 
  89. Oh HS, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Baek YW. Effect of scanning-aid agents on the scanning accuracy in specially designed metallic models: a laboratory study. PLoS One 2022;17:e0267742-51.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267742
  90. Song J, Kim M. Accuracy on scanned images of full arch models with orthodontic brackets by various intraoral scanners in the presence of artificial saliva. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:2920804. 
  91. You R, Han F, Sun Z, Xie H, Chen C. Evaluation of intraoral optical scanning accuracy for fine structure reconstruction and occlusal records of inlay/onlay preparations. Int J Comput Dent 2022;25:257-65. 
  92. Alenezi A, Yehya M, Alkhodary M. Effect of full arch two scanning techniques on the accuracy of overdenture conventional and CAD/CAM Co-Cr bars. Saudi Dent J 2022;34:553-64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.007
  93. Mai HY, Mai HN, Lee CH, Lee KB, Kim SY, Lee JM, Lee KW, Lee DH. Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2022;14:88-95.  https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.88
  94. Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Suzuki T, Minakuchi S. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:324-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.005
  95. An H, Langas EE, Gill AS. Effect of scanning speed, scanning pattern, and tip size on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. J Prosthet Dent 2022:S0022- 3913(22)00326-2. 
  96. Chen Y, Zhai Z, Li H, Yamada S, Matsuoka T, Ono S, Nakano T. Influence of liquid on the tooth surface on the accuracy of intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2022;31:59-64.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13358
  97. Donmez MB, Cakmak G, Atalay S, Yilmaz H, Yilmaz B. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment-scan body system depending on the scan pattern and implant location: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2022;124:104169-79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104169
  98. Gavounelis NA, Gogola CC, Halazonetis DJ. The effect of scanning strategy on intraoral scanner's accuracy. Dent J (Basel) 2022;10:123-33.  https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10070123
  99. Gomez-Polo M, Ortega R, Sallorenzo A, AgustinPanadero R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Revilla-Leon M. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. J Dent 2022;127:104307-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104307
  100. Kanjanasavitree P, Thammajaruk P, Guazzato M. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans. J Dent 2022;125:104266-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104266
  101. Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:755-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016
  102. Li Z, Huang R, Wu X, Chen Z, Huang B, Chen Z. Effect of scan pattern on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions with two intraoral scanners. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2022;37:731-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9248
  103. Oh HS, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Baek YW. Influence of scanning-aid materials on the accuracy and time efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch digital scanning: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:2340-51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092340
  104. Oh HS, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim WH, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Influence of applied liquid-type scanning-aid material on the accuracy of the scanned image: an in vitro experiment. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:2034-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092034
  105. Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagao V, Street A. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:307-19.
  106. Rapone B, Palmisano C, Ferrara E, Di Venere D, Albanese G, Corsalini M. The accuracy of three intraoral scanners in the oral environment with and without saliva: a comparative study. Appl Sci 2020;10:7762-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217762
  107. Revilla-Leon M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascon W, Zandinejad A, Ozcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:372-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003
  108. Tao C, Zhao YJ, Sun YC, Heng MD, Xie QF, Pan SX. Accuracy of intraoral scanning of edentulous jaws with and without resin markers. Chin J Dent Res 2020;23:265-71.
  109. Lee KM. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis. Prog Orthod 2018;19:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0205-5
  110. Grassi FR, Rapone B, Scarano Catanzaro F, Corsalini M, Kalemaj Z. Effectiveness of computer-assisted anesthetic delivery system (sta™) in dental implant surgery: a prospective study. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2017;10:381-9. https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.381
  111. Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:328-35.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028
  112. Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 2018;27:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
  113. Ferrari M, Keeling A, Mandelli F, Lo Giudice G, Garcia-Godoy F, Joda T. The ability of marginal detection using different intraoral scanning systems: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent 2018;31:272-6.
  114. European Lightening Standard. EN 12464-1. Light and lighting - Lighting of work places - Part 1: Indoor work places. 2011.
  115. Blanco D, Fernandez P, Cuesta E, Suarez CM. Influence of ambient light on the quality of laser digitized surfaces. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering, vol. 1; 2008. p. 32-7.
  116. Fang JH, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH. Digital intraoral scanning technique for edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:733-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.008
  117. Chebib N, Kalberer N, Srinivasan M, Maniewicz S, Perneger T, Muller F. Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:623-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.016
  118. Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:914-20. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0209
  119. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
  120. Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
  121. Deferm JT, Schreurs R, Baan F, Bruggink R, Merkx MAW, Xi T, Berge SJ, Maal TJJ. Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1303-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2198-8
  122. Anh JW, Park JM, Chun YS, Kim M, Kim M. A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:3-12. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.3
  123. Khraishi H, Duane B. Evidence for use of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions for obtaining fullarch digital impressions is insufficient. Evid Based Dent 2017;18:24-5.
  124. Huang MY, Son K, Lee KB. Effect of distance between the abutment and the adjacent teeth on intraoral scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:911-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.034
  125. Burde AV, Dudea D, Cuc S, Moldovan M, Campian RS. Three-dimensional evaluations of the coating thickness of two optical conditioning scanning sprays. Mater Plast 2016;53:65-7.
  126. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008
  127. Dehurtevent M, Robberecht L, Behin P. Influence of dentist experience with scan spray systems used in direct CAD/CAM impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.006