DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Importance-Performance Analysis of Restaurant Meal Replacement (RMR) Selection Attributes According to Food Involvement Type

음식관여도 유형에 따른 레스토랑 간편식 선택속성 중요도-수행도 분석

  • Seung Gyun Choi (Department of Food & Nutrition, Soongeui Women's University) ;
  • Wan Soo Hong (Department of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University)
  • 최승균 (숭의여자대학교 식품영양과) ;
  • 홍완수 (상명대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2023.10.31
  • Accepted : 2023.12.15
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

This study evaluated the consumers' demands and points of improvement for restaurant meal replacement through importance-performance analysis by the restaurant meal replacement segment market using food involvement. The results were as follows. First, after segmenting the restaurant meal replacement market using food involvement, it was classified into three markets (multiple involvements, exploration-oriented, and product quality-oriented). Second, an analysis of the importance of restaurant meal replacement selection attributes revealed taste, sanitation, quality, freshness, price, saving time, texture, ingredients, preparation process, and quantity to be highly important. An analysis of the differences according to the market type revealed the multiple involvement type to be more important than other groups, considering the restaurant meal replacement selection attribute element. Third, an analysis of the importance-performance analysis of restaurant meal replacement selection attributes revealed that quantity and price as the selection attributes that needed to be improved first in all three markets. In addition, in the multiple involvement type, food additives appeared as a selection attribute requiring priority improvement, revealing the characteristics of a market that cares about diet and health.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 농림축산식품부에서 시행한 차세대식품가공기술개발 사업의 레스토랑 메뉴 대체(RMR) 제품 품질·안전확보 기술 개발 과제에 대해 지원받은 연구의 일부로 수행하였으며 이에 감사드립니다(121020033HD020).

References

  1. Baek EJ. 2017. A Study on Market Segmentation Strategy for Home Meal Replacement Product Development Targeting HongKong Consumers: Focusing on Food Related Lifestyle, Food Neophobia, Food Involvement. Doctorate dissertation. Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea. pp 89-122
  2. Beak NY, Kim HS. 2023. A Study on Consumer Subjectivity of the Restaurant Meal Replacement Product. J. Korea Contents Assoc., 23(4):126-133
  3. Bell R, Marshall DW. 2003. The construct of food involvement in behavioral research: scale development and validation. Appetite, 40(3):235-244 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00009-6
  4. Chen MF 2007. Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Relation to organic Foods in Taiwan. Food Qual. Prefer,. 18(7):1008-1021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.004
  5. Choi JH, Yi NY. 2019. IPA on the choice attribute of HMR (home meal replacement) products-focusing on the comparison among consumers aged between 20 and 40, or over 50. Korean J. Food Nutr., 32(1):50-60
  6. Chung HC, Kim CW. 2020. A Study on the Meal Kit Product Selection Attributes on Purchasing Behavior and Satisfaction. J. Korea Contents Assoc., 20(6):381-391
  7. Drichoutis AC, Lazaridis P, Nayga RM. 2007. An assessment of product class involvement in food-purchasing behavior. Eur. J. Mark., 41(7):888-914
  8. Ghali-Zinoubi Z, Toukabri M. 2019. The antecedents of the consumer purchase intention: Sensitivity to price and involvement in organic product: Moderating role of product regional identity. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 90:175-179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.028
  9. Ji YH, Han JH. 2022. Sustainable Home Meal Replacement (HMR) Consumption in Korea: Exploring Service Strategies Using a Modified Importance-Performance Analysis. Foods, 11(6):889
  10. Jung JH. 2021. A Study on Meal Kits Purchase Intention for Consumers using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB): Focused on Gender. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res., 27(12):57-67
  11. Kim CW, Lee KY. 2020. Effect of Restaurant Meal Replacement Product Selection Attributes on Brand Image and Satisfaction. Int. J. Contents, 20(12):471-481
  12. Kim JY. 2021a. RMR (Restaurant Meal Replacement): Product Attributes, Consumption Value and Purchasing Intentions the Moderating Effects of MZ Generation and X Generation. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res., 27(8):97-110
  13. Kim MJ. 2021b. The Effects of Restaurant Meal Replacement Product Selection Attributes on the Brand Image and Purchase Intentions. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res., 27(10):90-100
  14. Kim MS. 2023. A Study on the Effects of Restaurant Franchise's Dinescape on Customer Satisfaction, Revisit Intention, and Recommendation Intention -Focusing on the moderating effect of food involvement-. Doctorate dissertation. Honam University, Gwangju, Korea. pp 73-82
  15. Kim SH, Sun KA. 2022. Effects of selection attributes of franchise restaurants on purchase intention at online food delivery platforms and the moderating role of involvement. Event Conv. Res., 18(2):65-88
  16. Kim SJ, Cho MH. 2015. The Effects of Health-related Menu Choice Attributes on Customer Behavioral Intentions at Well-being Restaurants -The Moderating Roles of Food Involvement and Trust-. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult. 30(3):333-344 https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2015.30.3.333
  17. Kim SK, Lee YM, Song KH, Lee YJ. 2021. Association of Healthy Dietary and Eating-out Behavior with Food Involvement among Young Adults in Seoul and Gyeonggi Area. J. East Asian Soc. Diet. Life, 31(2):123-132
  18. Kim SM. 2021c. Differences in RMR Selection Attributes according to Food Related Values and their effect on Purchase Intention. Master's thesis. Kyunghee University, Seoul, Korea. pp 1-4
  19. Lee EJ, Lee KR. 2019. Comparison on Solo eating Perception and Dietary Behaviors by marriage status in Seoul and Gyonggi-do region. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 15(2):79-95
  20. Lee GO. 2020a. The effect of the MATJIB according to the level of involvement in SNS information quality on satisfaction and visit intention. Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Res., 34(8):193-204 https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2020.8.34.8.193
  21. Lee SC. 2020b. The Effect of Consumers' Perceived Value for Delivery App on Satisfaction, Reorder Intention, and Acceptance Intention -The Moderating Effect of Food Involvement -. J. Hotel Resort, 19(4):297-318
  22. Lee SC, Song KO. 2018. Effect of Food Involvement, HMR Selection Attributes and Repurchase Intention: Focused on female consumers. J. Tour. Leis. Res., 30(3):157-175
  23. Lee SW. 2021. Effect of Selection Attributes for RMR on Satisfaction: Moderating Effect of COVID Blue. Master's thesis. Kyunghee University, Seoul, Korea. pp 83-86
  24. Moon YK, Kwon AM, Namkung Y. 2023. The Effects of Consumption Facilitators and Inhibitors of Restaurant Meal Replacement (RMR) on Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention in the Food Industry on Dual-factor theory: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of the Involvement of Gastronomy. Korean J. Hosp. Tour., 32(1):67-86
  25. Moreo A, Traynor M, Beldona S. 2022. Food enthusiasts: A behavioral typology. Food Qual. Prefer., 96:104369
  26. Nam DH, Ku YA, Ahn SS. 2021. A Study on Strategic Proposals to Improve Purchase Behavior of Home Meal Replacement (HMR): Based on the Importance Performance Analysis. Acad. Custom. Satisf. Manag., 26(3):1-19
  27. No BK. 2019. Effects of Selection Attributes of HMR Products on Customer Satisfaction and Recommending Others. J. Tour. Leis. Res., 31(2):293-307
  28. Oh WK, Hong JY. 2019. IPA Analysis on Selection Attributes of RTC (Ready To Cook) Typ e Meal Kit HMR (Home Meal Replacement). Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res., 25(11):69-81
  29. Oh WK, Hwang SJ. 2021. The Effect of Selective Attributes of Meal Kit according to Eating Lifestyle on Satisfaction. FoodServ. Ind. J., 17(1):31-50
  30. Park MH, Kwon MW, Nah K. 2019. Study on Repurchase Intention of RTP HMR Products: Focused on Meal kit. J. Korea Contents Assoc., 19(2):548-557
  31. Park SB, Lee HJ, Kim HY, Hwang HS, Park DS, Hong WS. 2016. A Study on Domestic Consumers' Needs and Importance-Performance Analysis of Selective Attributes for Developing Home Meal Replacement (HMR) Products. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci., 32(3):342-352
  32. Robinson RNS, Getz D. 2016. Food enthusiasts and tourism: Exploring food involvement dimensions. J. Hosp. Tour. Res., 40(4):432-455
  33. Sarmugam R, Worsley A. 2015. Dietary behaviours, impulsivity and food involvement: Identification of three consumer segments. Nutr., 7(9):8036-8057 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7095379
  34. Victoir A, Eertmans A, Vansant G, Vanden Bergh O. 2005. Food-related Personality Traits, Food Choice Motives and Food Intake; Mediator and Moderator Relationships. Food Qual. Prefer., 16(8):714-726
  35. Yang YY, Kwon YS, Park YH, Yun Y. 2019. Importance-Performance Analysis Regarding Selective Attribution of Meal-Kit Products. J. East Asian Soc. Diet. Life, 29(6):519-528
  36. Yoo CJ, Ahn KH, Park SW. 2011. A Study of the Influence of Online Word-of-Mouth on the Customer Purchase Intention. Korean J. Mark., 13(3):209-231
  37. ATFIS. 2020. Let's find out what RMR is. https://www.atfis.or.kr/fip/front/M000000266/board/view.do?articleId=4072. [Accessed October 27, 2022]
  38. Chosun Biz. 2022. Restaurant snack (RMR) is also popular for its unique taste. RMR's new product collaborating with famous restaurants. Available from: http://digitalchosun.dizzo.com/site/data/html_dir/2022/05/02/2022050280145.html. [Accessed July 4, 2022]
  39. KDI. 2021. According to 2021 statistics, it's one person. Available form: https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/policy/materialView.do?num=221120. [Accessed July 4, 2022]