한국전자통신학회논문지 (The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences)

한국전자통신학회 (Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국, 미국, 중국의 애니메이션 기술의 특성 분석 -특허기술비교분석-

Analysis of Animation Technology Characteristics in Korea, the United States, and China - Comparative Analysis of Patent Technology -

  • 정연주 (엔씨소프트 TL Camp 시네마팀) ;
  • 정의섭 (한국과학기술정보연구원 수도권지원)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.02
  • 심사 : 2023.12.27
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국내 애니메이션 산업이 위축되고 있어 새로운 기술 및 애니메이션 제작 방식의 변화에 적극적으로 대응해야 할 시점이다. 2016년부터 2020년까지 애니메이션 기술 분야에서 미국, 중국, 한국에 등록된 특허정보를 통해 기술 주체인 출원인을 분석하고 각국 출원인이 추구하는 기술 정책 및 전략을 검토하였다. 중국이 가장 많은 특허를 등록하여 기술 활동성 지수가 높았으며, 미국의 시장 확보 지수가 높게 나타났다. 포지셔닝 분석 결과, 시간이 지남에 따라 미국의 시장 확보 영향력은 감소하였고, 중국의 기술 활동은 시간이 지남에 따라 점차 증가하였으며, 한국의 기술 활동성 및 시장 확보 지수는 감소하였다. 세계 최대 애니메이션 제작국으로 부상한 중국을 반영하여 한국도 애니메이션 지원정책을 개발해야 한다.

As the domestic animation industry is shrinking, it is time to actively respond to changes in new technologies and animation production methods. From 2016 to 2020, through patent information registered in the United States, China, and Korea in the field of animation technology, applicants who are the subject of technology were analyzed and technical policies and strategies pursued by applicants in each country were reviewed. China registered the most patents, so the technical activity index was high, and the US family patent size was high. As a result of positioning analysis, the U.S. market expansion influence decreased over time, China's technological activity gradually increased over time, and Korea's technological activity and family patent size decreased. Reflecting China's rise as the world's largest animation producer, Korea should also develop a policy to support animation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. Park, The structure and strategy of animation narrative. Seoul: Nonhyeong, 2004.
  2. Korea Creative Content Agency, "Capital's Interest In Animation Production Services," ANIMATION INDUSTRY WHITE PAPER, 2022.
  3. Korea Creative Content Agency, "CONTENT INDUSTRY TREND OF CHINA," Technical Report, 2023.
  4. I. Yun, S. Kim, and E. Jeong, "Evaluation of Technology Activity, Innovation and Productivity using Korean Patent Information," J. Information Management, vol. 42, no. 2, 2011, pp. 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.2.151
  5. J. Yu, Y. Han, H. Yang, S. Lee, G. Kim, and C. Lee, "Promising Technology Analysis and Patent Roadmap Development in the Hydrogen Supply Chain," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, Oct. 2022, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114210
  6. Y. Oh and H. Moon, "Analysis of global trends on smart manufacturing technology using topic modeling," J. of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, vol. 27, no. 4, 2022, pp. 65-79.
  7. S. Yoon and Y. Ji, "Analyzing Technology Competitiveness by Country in the Semiconductor Cleaning Equipment Sector Using Quantitative Indices and Co-Classification Network," J. of the Korea Convergence Society, vol. 10, no. 11, 2019, pp. 85-93.
  8. X. Yang, X. Yu, and X. Liu, "Obtaining a Sustainable Competitive Advantage from Patent Information: A Patent Analysis of the Graphene Industry," Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, Dec. 2018, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124800
  9. J. Yun, E. Jeong, Y. Lee, and K. Kim, "The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea," Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072459
  10. T. Kim, J. Lee, Y. Lee, J. Kim, and T. Lee, "A study on Analysis of Convergence Trends in Global BIM Market Using Patent Information," Korean J. of construction engineering and management, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 95-104.
  11. J. Yun, E. Jeong, and J. Park, "Network Analysis of Open Innovation," Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 8, July 2016, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080729
  12. T. Kim, W. Choi, and H. Lee, "A Study on the Research Trends in Fintech using Topic Modeling," J. of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 17, no. 11, 2016, pp. 670-681. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.11.670
  13. H. Lee, N. Ryu, and E. Kim, "Design and Implementation of the Smart AR System based on Contextual UX for Expansion of the Interaction," J. of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, 2012, pp. 439-445.
  14. E. Jeong, Y. Kim, S. Lee, Y. Kim, and Y. Chang, "Identifying Emerging Free Technologies by PCT Patent Analysis," J. of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, 2014, pp. 111-121. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2014.9.1.111
  15. J. Park and Y. Bae, "Scientometric Analysis for Pilot Study of Smart Grid," J. of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 97-105.
  16. Y. Kim, "Technological Capability and Technology Catch-up: Focused on Patent Analysis of Korea, US, Japan and China," Int..Regional Studies, vol. 23, no.1, 2014, pp. 79-108.
  17. E. Jeong, J. Seo, W. Kim, O. Kwon, and G. Noh, "A strategic partner in patent analysis - an easy-to-understand guide to using patent indicators," Report, 2006.
  18. M. Kim, "Analysis indicators examined through patents," Patent 21, no. 56, 2004, pp. 2-11.