DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ESG 성과와 외국인지분율 간의 관계에 있어서 TCFD 정보 공시 여부의 조절효과

Moderating Effect of TCFD Disclosure on the Relationship between ESG Performance and Foreign Ownership

  • 박정빈 (인하대학교 대학원 녹색금융전공) ;
  • 김종대 (인하대학교 경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.09
  • 심사 : 2023.11.28
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31

초록

본 연구는 지속가능경영보고서를 발간하는 상장기업을 대상으로 ESG 성과가 외국인지 분율에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는지 확인하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 나아가, 지속가능경영보고서 내 환경정보를 TCFD 권고안에 맞춰 공시했는지가 ESG 성과와 외국인지분율 간의 관계를 조절하는지 검증한다. 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 해당 연도의 ESG 성과 및 다음 연도의 외국인지분율 사이에는 양의 상관관계를 가진다. 즉, 기업의 ESG 성과가 높을수록 외국인지분율도 높아진다. 둘째, TCFD 권고안에 따른 환경정보 공시 여부가 ESG 성과와 외국인지분율 간의 관계를 양의 방향으로 조절한다. 즉, TCFD 권고안에 따른 환경정보 공시는 ESG 성과와 외국인지분율 간의 양의 상관관계를 더 강화한다. 결론적으로 본 연구는 외국인 투자자는 ESG 성과가 좋은 기업에 더 투자하며 특히 TCFD 권고안에 따라 환경정보를 공시하는 기업의 경우 그 효과가 더 크다는 것을 보여준다.

This study aims to determine whether ESG performance positively affects foreign ownership for listed firms that publish sustainability reports. Furthermore, we test whether the disclosure of environmental information in the sustainability report in accordance with the TCFD recommendations moderates the relationship between ESG performance and foreign ownership. The results of the empirical analysis are as follows. First, there is a positive correlation between ESG performance in a given year and foreign ownership in the following year, i.e., the higher a firm's ESG performance, the higher its foreign ownership. Second, the presence of environmental disclosure in accordance with the TCFD recommendations positively moderates the relationship between ESG performance and foreign ownership, i.e., environmental disclosure in accordance with the TCFD recommendations strengthens the positive relationship between ESG performance and foreign ownership. In conclusion, this study shows that foreign investors invest more in companies with better ESG performance, and the effect is stronger for companies that disclose environmental information in accordance with TCFD recommendations.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 환경부와 한국환경산업기술원의 「녹색융합기술 인재양성 특성화대학원 (녹색금융분야)」 3차년도 사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, M. G. and Ko, D. Y. (2014). The Effect of Foreign Investor and Performance on Corporate Sustainability Management Disclosure and Firm Value, Korea International Accounting Review, 53, 230-251. https://doi.org/10.21073/kiar.2014..53.012
  2. Al-Gamrh, B., Al-Dhamari, R., Jalan, A. and Jahanshahi, A. A. (2020). The impact of board independence and foreign ownership on financial and social performance of firms: Evidence from the UAE, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 201-229 https://doi.org/10.1108/IAAR-09-2018-0147.
  3. Alregab, H. (2022). The Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Attracting Foreign Ownership: Evidence from Saudi Arabia, Sustainability 2022, 14 (23), 15626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315626.
  4. Bae, S. M., Masud, M. A. K. and Kim, J. D. (2018). A Cross-County Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective, Sustainability 2018, 10(8), 2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082611. 
  5. Baik, S. M. and Choi, J. M. (2021). The effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) activities on financial performance, and market reaction for food and beverage manufacturing companies, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 23(4), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.31667/jhts.2021.12.89.202
  6. Borghei, Z., Leung, P. and Guthrie, J. (2018). Voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure impacrs on accounting-based performance: Australian evidence, Australasian Journal of Environment Management, 25(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2018.1466204.
  7. Chen, H. M., Kuo, T. C. and Chen, J. L. (2022). Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change relalted risks, Journal of Cleaner Production, 380(1), 134951. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.iclepro.2022.134951
  8. Cheung, J. H. and Ki, D. H. (2023). A Study on IFRS S1 and S2 Acceptance Levels of Sustainability Reports in Korea, Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, 28(2), 287-321. https://doi.org/10.21737/RAPS.2023.05.28.2.287
  9. Choy, J. H. (2021). A Study on ESG Performance and Firm Value: Focusing on Moderating Effects of Ownership Structure, The Journal of Women and Economics, 18(2), 91-115.
  10. Doh, J. P., Howton, S. D., Howton, S. W. and Siegel, D. S. (2010). Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legiti-macy, Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461-1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309337896
  11. EY Climate Change and Sustainability Services. (2020). How will ESG Performance Shape Your Future?.
  12. Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I. and Arisman, A. (2022). The Ownership Structure, and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure, Firm Value and Firm Performance: The Audit Committee as Moderating Variable, Economies 2022, 10(12), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120314.
  13. GC Corp. (2022). 2022 GC Sustainability Report.
  14. Hanjin. (2022). Hanjin 2022 ESG Report (KOR).
  15. IFRS. (2023). IFRS Foundation welcomes culmination of TCFD work and transfer of TCFD monitoring responsibilities to ISSB from 2024, https://www.ifrs.org/news-andevents/news/2023/07/foundation-welcomes-tcfd-responsibilities-from-2024 (Accessed on Oct. 26th, 2023)
  16. Ionescu, G. H., Firoiu, D., Pirvu, R. and Vilag, R. D. (2019). The Impact of ESG factors on market value of companies from travel and tourism industry, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(5), 820-849. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.10294.
  17. Jung, Y. K. (2012). The Performance Factors of CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility) and the Sustainable Growth Forecast, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 25(4), 2065-2089.
  18. KCGS. (2023). KCGS ESG Assessment Methodology.
  19. Kim, D. Y. (2022). A Study on the Effects of ESG Evaluation Information and Credit Scores on Foreign Ownership, Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 36(3), 131-158. https://doi.org/10.15843/kpapr.36.3.2022.8.131
  20. Kim, S. W., Lee, K. H. and Lee, M. Y. (2013). The Effects of CSR to Foreign Institutional Investors' Ownership and Firm Value, Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(3), 429-456. https://doi.org/10.15843/kpapr.27.3.201309.429
  21. Ko, D. Y. and Ahn, M. G. (2017). The Effect of Environmental Information Disclosure on Foreign Ownership, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 30(4), 1275-1296. https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2017.08.30.4.1275
  22. Kwack, B. S. and Rhee, J. H. (2021). The Relationship between ESG Level and Foreign Ownership: The Investors' Sensitivity to the Regulation Risk Exposure, Journal of Strategic Management, 24(1), 35-66.
  23. Lee, J. I., Kim, S. J. and Kwon, I. S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Strategic Means to Attract Foreign Investment: Evidence from Korea, Sustainability 2017, 9(11), 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112121.
  24. Lee, K. S. and Jeon, S. I. (2019). The Effects of Carbon Emission Information on Firm Value, Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 27(2), 69-98. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2019.27.2.69
  25. Lim, D. S. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility, Foreign Holding Rate, Financial Performance : Evidence from Korea, The Review of Business History, 26(4), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.22629/kabh.2011.26.4.013
  26. Moon, S. I. (2023). Current Status and Improvement Measures of Domestic Listed Companies' ESG Disclosure System, Korea Economic Law Association, 22(2), 67-98.
  27. Naver. (2022). TCFD Report: Towards 2040 Carbon Negative.
  28. Panicker, V. S. (2017). Ownership and corporate social responsibility in Indian firms, Social Responsibilty Journal, 13(4), 714?727. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2017-0030.
  29. Park, J. H. and Noh, J. H. (2017). The Effect of GHG Emission on the Firm Value : Using the Carbon Disclosure Project Data, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 30(5), 1643-1663. https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2017.10.30.5.1643
  30. Park, J. W. (2011). The Impact of Foreign Investor on Korea Firm's Performance and Value, Korean Corporation Management Review, 18(2), 203-215.
  31. Park, K. S. and Lee, E. J. (2006). The role of foreign investors on the management and corporate governance of Korean companies, Review of Financial Economics, 20(2), 73-113.
  32. Rha, J. S. (2022). Review of ESG Challenges in Supply Chain Management Using Text Analysis, Journal of the Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems, 27(5), 145-156.
  33. Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N. and Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Its Relation on Institutional Ownership: Evidence from Public Listed Companies in Malaysia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 591-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011054881.
  34. Samsung. (2021). Samsung Sustainability Report 2021.
  35. Shinsegae. (2021). 2021 Shinsegae ESG Report.
  36. SK hynix. (2022). SK hynix TCFD Report 2022.
  37. Su, W., Peng, M. W., Tan, W. and Cheung, Y. L. (2016). The signaling effect of corporate social re-sponsibility in emerging economies, Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2404-4.
  38. Suortti, J. (2021). TCFD-framework disclosure and its effect on cost of equity capital, Master Thesis, Alto University School of Business, Espoo, Finland.
  39. Yang, I. J., Park, J. H. and Kim, Y. S. (2022). Recommendations for Carbon Neutrality and ESG Management in Mining Industry, Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, 59(5), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2022.59.5.474
  40. Yoon, M. O. and Kim, S. H. (2022). Effect of a Company's ESG Level on Foreign Investment: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Tax Benefits, Korean Accounting Journal, 31(5), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.24056/KAJ.2022.07.001
  41. Zhang, Y. and Wiersema, M. F. (2009). Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background, Strategic Management Journal, 30(7), 693-710. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.772.