References
- Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 111-5.
- Jang KA, Heo SE, Kang HK, Lee SJ. A convergence study on the changes of awareness and preference according to the clinical application experience of digital intraoral scanners in dental hygienists. J Korea Converg Soc. 2018; 9: 135-40.
- Christopoulou I, Kaklamanos EG, Makrygiannakis MA, Bitsanis I, Tsolakis AI. Patient-reported experiences and preferences with intraoral scanners: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2022; 44: 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab027
- Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14: 10.
- Yilmaz H, Aydin MN. Digital versus conventional impression method in children: comfort, preference and time. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019; 29: 728-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12566
- Revilla-Leon M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: part 2-patient factors. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35: 241-9.
- Revilla-Leon M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: operator factors. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35: 230-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12985
- Dutton E, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Culp A, Kessler R, Renne W. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32: 204-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12528
- Laing E, Ashley P, Naini FB, Gill DS. Space maintenance. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009; 19: 155-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00951.x
- Fekonja A. Evaluation of the eruption of permanent teeth and their association with malocclusion. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022; 8: 836-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.544
- Choi H, Kim C, Lee D, Yang Y, Kim J. Measurement of maximum mouth opening in 2 to 6 year-old Korean children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2015; 42: 242-8. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2015.42.3.242
- Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int. 2016; 47: 343-9.
- Lee JB, Kim CC, Hahn SH, Lee SH. A morphometric study of the maxillary primary first molars using three-dimensional scanner. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2006; 33: 643-52.
- Pinho T, Rocha D, Ribeiro S, Monteiro F, Pascoal S, Azevedo R. Interceptive treatment with Invisalign® first in moderate and severe cases: a case series. Children (Basel). 2022; 9: 1176.
- Beretta M, Federici Canova F, Zaffarano L, Gianolio A. DOP Dentistry: digitally embracing orthodontics and paediatric dentistry. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2022; 23: 295-7.
- Khanna S, Rao D, Panwar S, Pawar BA, Ameen S. 3D printed band and loop space maintainer: a digital game changer in preventive orthodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021; 45: 147-51. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-45.3.1
- Tokuc M, Yilmaz H. Comparison of fit accuracy between conventional and CAD/CAM-fabricated band-loop space maintainers. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022; 32: 764-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12955
- ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: general principles and definitions [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5725:-1:ed-2:v1:en
- Son K, Lee KB. Effect of tooth types on the accuracy of dental 3D scanners: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13: 1744.
- Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow--the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17: 2119-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5
- Shim JS, Lee JS, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Shin SW, Ryu JJ. Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 515-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150081
- Braian M, Wennerberg A. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: a comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122: 129-36. e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.007
- Kaihara Y, Kihara T, Kakayama A, Amano H, Nikawa H, Kozai K. Accuracy of a non-contact 3D measuring system for dental model analysis. Pediatr Dent J. 2013; 23: 71-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2013.04.001
- Camci H, Salmanpour F. Effect of saliva isolation and intraoral light levels on performance of intraoral scanners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158: 759-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.022
- Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 2673040.