동아시아경상학회지 (East Asian Journal of Business Economics (EAJBE))

동아시아경상학회 (East Asia Business Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Clean Bill of Lading under the Uniform Customs Practices

  • Jaesung LEE (Department of International Trade, Dong Eui University)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.23
  • 심사 : 2023.12.30
  • 발행 : 2023.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose - Disputes arising from documentary letter of credit transactions are not decreasing. According to a statistical data from the ICC, 60-70% of letters of credit in use around the world, so, Incoterms rule specifically defines the bill of lading review procedure. Research design, data, and methodology - The refusal due to large or small inconsistencies in terms and conditions when first presenting documents with bill of lading. First of all, confusion was caused by the ambiguous regulation as the bill of lading is a document that serves as evidence of the transportation contract. Result - Bill of lading indicates the rights to the cargo as well as a bill of lading, which is evidence of a transportation contract concluded between carriers, is a document that allows a carrier to receive or ship cargo and ship it by sea. It is a security that promises to be delivered through transportation to the rightful holder of the bill of lading. Conclusion - Because of its importance, the Uniform customs practices for Letters of Credit stipulate acceptance requirements for transport documents, including bills of lading. In addition, the International Standard Banking Practices (ISBP) established by the International Chamber of Commerce also provide supplementary provisions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Datta, D. K., & Narayanan V. K. (1992). Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: a meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130106
  2. Dikova, D. P. & Witteloostuijn, A. V. (2010). Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: the effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.10
  3. Ferreira, M. P. & Reis, N. R. (2014). Mergers & acquisitions research: a bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2550-2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.015
  4. Han, D. H. (2006). An analysis of the case for carriers' (delivery) duty on straight bill of lading. The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 1(1), 170-171.
  5. Huh, J. C. (2010). A study on the dap term under incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 6(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.6.1.201003.103
  6. Huh, J. C. (2010). A study on the seller's obligation to insure of cif term in incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 6(4), 191-202.
  7. Hyun, D. K. (2001). Legal issues on the transfer of bill of lading. The Journal of Korea Maritime Law Association, 23(2), 308-311.
  8. Jeon, S. H. (2010). A study on the main revision of incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 6(4), 567-603. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.6.4.201012.567
  9. Jeon, S. H. (2011). A study on the obligations for electronic submission of security information under incoterms 2010: based on the import security filing in U.S. Journal of E-business Studies, 12(4), 332-371.
  10. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of allocation of costs in the incoterms 2010. International Commerce and Information Review, 14(3), 502-503.
  11. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of carriage contracts in incoterms 2010. Korea Trade Review, 37(2), 318-325.
  12. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of contract of insurance in incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 8(1), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.8.1.201203.335
  13. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of delivery and taking delivery in incoterms 2010. The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 13(4), 232-235.
  14. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of risk transfer in incoterms 2010. The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 13(2), 179.
  15. Jeon, S. H. (2014). A study on the clauses of notices in incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 10(3), .679-693.
  16. Jeon, S. H. (2015). An examination of the clauses of checking, packaging, marking and inspection of goods under incoterms 2010 rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 11(5), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.11.5.201510.101
  17. Jeon, S. H. (2015). A study on the seller's obligation of delivery documents and the buyer's obligation of proof of delivery in incotermsⓇ 2010 rules. Korea Trade Review, 40(5), 318-351.
  18. Jeon, S. H. (2016). An examination of container cargo rules under the new incoterms 2010: based on FCA, CIP and CIP rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 12(3), 539-559.
  19. Jung, H. D. (2006). Delivery of cargo without presentation of the bill of lading and the liability of carrier ship agent and warehouse. Journal of Maritime and Insurance Law, 2(1), 128-135.
  20. Kang, W. D. (1991). Letter of guarantee and carrier's liability. Commercial Cases Review, 4(1), 115-127.
  21. Kang, J. W. (2006). Change in FOB and CIF prices for the export-import declaration in Korea. The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 7(2), 396-422.
  22. Kim, D. C. (2019). A study on the delivered at terminal (dat) term under incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 15(1), 473-490.
  23. Kim, I. H. (2013). Various types of bill of lading and its substitutes engaged in the shipping practice. Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 22(1), 272-275.
  24. Lee, H. M. (2010). Several private international law issues associated with the governing law clause in bills of lading. Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 19(1), 173-187.
  25. Lee, J. S. (2015). A study on the surrender B/L and the subrogation claim of marine cargo insurance under international trade transaction. The International Commerce & Law Review, 65(1), 72-73.
  26. Lee, J. S. (2019). Issues in trade documents resulting from the misuse of trade terms in incoterms: a literature review. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 15(6), 633-652.
  27. Lee, J. S. & Huh, E. S. (2017). A study on standard types of free carrier (fca) on incoterms for seaborne container goods transportation: Korean trade companies' perspective. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(5), 51-66.
  28. Lee, S. K. (2018). A comparison of the transfer of risk between CISG and incotermsⓇ 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 14(4), 239-257.
  29. Lee, J. W. (2011). A study on delivery of goods. Pusan National University Law Review, 52(1), 199-200.
  30. Park, J. S. (2012). A study on the implications of incoterms 2010 for Korea: focused on FOB․CIF. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 8(3), 261-280.
  31. Park, J. S. (2012). A study on the implications of incoterms 2010 for Korea: focused on FOB․CIF. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 8(3), 273-274.
  32. Park, S. J. (2020). A study on the problems related to international multimodal transport in international trade rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 16(1), 401-410.
  33. Park, S. W. (2011). A study on the revision of incoterms 2010 and its application with L/C. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 7(3), .87-109.
  34. Park, S. W. (2017). A review of the transportation rules of FOB and CFR under incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(1), 411-427.
  35. Park, S. W. (2018). A review of the transportation rules of DAT and DAP under incoterms® 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 14(1), 419-434.
  36. Park, S. W. & Han, K. M. (2010). A study on the revision of incoterms 2010 and its relation with CISG. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 6(4), 322.
  37. Park, S. W. & Han, K. M. (2012. 2). The efficacy of straight bill of lading as collateral. The International Commerce & Law Review, 53(2), 186-189.
  38. Ramberg, J. (2011). Incoterms 2010. Penn State International Law Review, 29(3), 416-419.
  39. Shin, H. S. & Kim, D. Y. (2019). An examination of the revised contents of incotermsⓇ 2020 rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 15(5), 537-552.
  40. Song, G. E. (2013). An analysis on the usage status and promotion of multimodal transport logistics terms in incoterms 2010. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 29(1), 126-139.
  41. Suk, K. H. (1999). Some issues on governing law of bills of lading. The International Commerce & Law Review, 12(1), 309-313.
  42. Mudambi, R. & Navarra, P. (2002). Institutions and international business: a theoretical overview. International Business Review, 11(6), 635-646.
  43. Muehlfeld, K. P. & Witteloostuijn, A.V. (2007). Completion or abandonment of mergers and acquisitions: evidence from the newspaper industry. Journal of Media Economics, 20(2), 107-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997760701193746
  44. Phene, A. S. & Almeida. P. (2012). When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation? Journal of Management, 38(3), 753-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369939
  45. Shimizu, M. A. & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: a review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2004.05.005
  46. Taguchi, N. (2012). A study of FCA, CPT, CIP in the latest incoterms. The Waseda Commercial Review, 1(1), 431-442.
  47. Vermeulen, F. & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069364
  48. Very, P. & Schweiger, D. M. (2001). The acquisition process as a learning process: evidence from a study of critical problems and solutions in domestic and cross-border deals. Journal of World Business, 36(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(00)00052-3
  49. Wang, L. & Zajac, E. J. (2007). Alliance or acquisition? a dyadic perspective on inter-firm resource combinations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 291-1317.
  50. Woo, K. M. (2013). Interpretation problem with application of incoterms in arbitral awards of the international chamber of commerce. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 9(7), 42-52.
  51. Woo, K. M. (2015). Traditional trade terms of incoterms® 2010 and the main standard contract form. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 11(4), 161-179.
  52. Woo, K. M. (2017). An analysis of the usage and problems of incoterms rules interpretation in small and medium trading companies. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(2), 235-253.
  53. Zhang, J. & Ebbers, H. (2010). Why half of china's overseas acquisitions could not be completed. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(2), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261003900204
  54. Zhang, J. & He, X. (2014). Economic nationalism and foreign acquisition completion: the case of China. International Business Review, 23(1), 212-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.04.002