DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Business Model Canvas and Marketability of Heritage Sites in Central Luzon: A Public Sector Perspective

  • Delia LUMIWES (Department of Business Administration, Graduate School, Tongmyong University) ;
  • Gi Ho JEONG (Department of Business Administration, Graduate School, Tongmyong University)
  • Received : 2023.11.19
  • Accepted : 2023.11.30
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to determine the marketability of the heritage sites in Region III, Philippines. More specifically, it will obtain information on the: (a) profile of the heritage sites in Central Luzon; (b) dimensional issues of their marketability along social, environmental, and economic lines; (c) quality of services in terms of tangibility, responsiveness, empathy, assurance, and reliability; and (d) its business model canvas. Research design, data, and methodology: This will utilize a descriptive survey of the heritage sites in Central Luzon, namely: Aurora, Nueva Ecija, Bulacan, Pampanga, Tarlac, Zambales, and Bataan. There will be 60 respondents, including 5 facilitators, 24 residents, and 31 tourists. The results will be statistically measured through the measures of central tendencies, dispersion, and the test of significance. Result and conclusion: This study will comprehensively examine the local tourism sector, benefiting various stakeholders. It serves as a valuable resource for tourists by providing insights into destination marketing strategies and enhancing heritage tourism experiences. Administrators benefit from coping strategy evaluations, aiding in the formulation of effective strategies aligned with industry goals. Tourism businesses align with industry objectives and the study streamlines ordinances for site protection for local government units. Additionally, the community gains empowerment through insights into employable activities and potential businesses, influencing assessments of the justification for local preservation ordinances.

Keywords

References

  1. Adem, Y. U. L. U, & KAPAN, K. (2020). The Role of Tourism in Urban Conservation: The Case of Manila, The Philippines. Cografya Dergisi, (41).
  2. Bi, J., & Lehto, X. Y. (2018). Impact of cultural distance on international destination choices: The case of Chinese outbound travelers. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2152
  3. Bosher, L., Kim, D., Okubo, T., Chmutina, K., & Jigyasu, R. (2019). Dealing with multiple hazards and threats on cultural heritage sites: an assessment of 80 case studies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal.
  4. Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2019). Intellectual Capital of the Cultural Heritage Ecosystems: A Knowledge Dynamics Approach. In Knowledge Management, Arts, and Humanities (pp. 215-238). Springer, Cham.
  5. Estonanto, C. D. L., Javier, J. C. V., Centeno, P. E. L., & Laquindanum, E. S. (2019, March). The Role of the National Government in the Preservation of the World Heritage Site of Crisologo Street Vigan Ilocos Sur Philippines. In International Symposium on Social Sciences, Education, and Humanities (ISSEH 2018). Atlantis Press.
  6. Fillone, A. M., Nicholas, J., Mateo-Babiano, I., & Ganzon, K. (2019). Planning for Sustainable Access of Upland Tourism Sites in the Cordillera Region, Philippines.
  7. Garbelli, M., Adukaite, A., & Cantoni, L. (2017). Value perception of world heritage sites and tourism sustainability matters through content analysis of online communications. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.
  8. Garcia-Hernandez, M., la Calle-Vaquero, D., & Yubero, C. (2017). Cultural heritage and urban tourism: Historic city centers under pressure. Sustainability, 9(8), 1346.
  9. Gonzales, M. L. N. (2018). Status of the Cultural Heritage Sites and Structures in Camalig, Province of Albay, Philippines: Basis for Sustainable Tourism Framework. JPAIRMultidisciplinary Research, 34(1).
  10. Herman, G. V., Tatar, C. F., & PUSCAS, B. D. (2018, December). Assessing the importance of the Jewish urban cultural heritage in Oradea, Bihor County, Romania. In Forum Geografic (Vol. 17, No. 2).
  11. Hernandez-Rojas, R.D., del Rio, J.A.J., Fernandez, A.I. et al. (2021) The cultural and heritage tourist, SEM analysis: the case of The Citadel of the Catholic King. Herit Sci 9, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00525-0
  12. Irmeili, G., & Caglayan, A. Y. (2022). Visitors' Experience at Historical Sites in the City of Amman: A Case Study. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 2(1), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v2i1.80
  13. Klimaszewski, C. (2016). Mapping knowledge orders in local museums: An example from Horodnic de Jos, Romania. I Conference 2016 Proceedings.
  14. Kulkarni, U., Meena, S. M., Gurlahosur, S. V., & Mudengudi, U. (2019, September). Classification of Cultural Heritage Sites Using Transfer Learning. In 2019 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM) (pp. 391-397). IEEE.
  15. Mekonnen, H., Bires, Z. & Berhanu, K. (2022). Practices and challenges of cultural heritage conservation in historical and religious heritage sites: evidence from North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Herit Sci 10, 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00802-6
  16. Murugkar, K., Kashyap, A., & Mullick, A. (2020). Examining the Experience, Barriers and Enabling Measures for Visually Impaired Visitors in Heritage Sites-A Study in the Indian Context to Enhance Accessibility and Inclusion. In Disability Studies in India (pp. 295-318). Springer, Singapore.
  17. Nixon, B. (2020). Assessing the environmental impacts of informal settlements in Vietnam: The case study of the Hue Citadel UNESCO World Heritage site. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 3(3), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.2495/EI-V3-N3-189-206
  18. Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J. A., Ombe, J., & Escoto, M. G. (2018). Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy Delphi method-A Philippine perspective. Ecological indicators, 93, 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.060
  19. Roberts, A., & Matos, M. (2020). Adaptive liminality: Bridging and bonding social capital between urban and rural Black meccas. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-22.
  20. Santa-Cruz, F. G., & Lopez-Guzman, T. (2017). Culture, tourism, and world heritage sites. Tourism Management Perspectives, 24, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.08.004
  21. Shackleton, R. T., Bertzky, B., Wood, L Bunbury., Jager, H., van Merm, R., & Richardson, D. M. (2020). Biological invasions in World Heritage Sites: status Proposed monitoring and reporting framework. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1-21.
  22. Smirnov L.(2019). 18 April 2019 International Day on Monuments and Sites: Bibliography: Selected references on the THEME" RURAL LANDSCAPES".
  23. Tiburcio-Garcia, E. (2020). Urban Imprints to Historic Churches in Bulacan Towns, Philippines: An Architectural Realization. In Urban and Transit Planning (pp. 203-213). Springer, Cham.
  24. Tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
  25. Yamagishi, K. D., Tiu, A. M. C., Tanaid, R. A. B., Medalla, M. E. F., Jabilles, E. M. Y., Caballes, S. A. A., & Ocampo, L. A. (2020). Characterizing Tourism Destination and Policies Forward: The Case in Bantayan Island, Philippines. Tourism Review International, 24(2-3), 143-165.
  26. Zhang, Y., Min, Q., Zhang, C., He, L., Zhang, S., Yang, L., & Xiong, Y. (2017). Traditional culture as an important power for maintaining agricultural landscapes in cultural heritage sites: A case study of the Hani terraces. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 25, 17