DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new objective quality metric for phase hologram processing

  • Oh, Kwan-Jung (Media Research Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Jinwoong (Media Research Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hui Yong (Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2021.06.21
  • 심사 : 2021.09.16
  • 발행 : 2022.02.01

초록

Because of its convenience and compatibility with various image processing techniques, digital image representation of holograms is generally used in digital holography, and thus, quality assessment of digital holograms is an essential issue. This study proposes a new objective quality metric for digital phase hologram image processing. The proposed metric is based on a newly defined phase distortion created by taking the 2π periodicity of phase information into account. The experimental results show that the proposed metric correlates with reconstruction image quality better than the existing metric under random distortions and also works well with JPEG 2000 compression. It is expected to be broadly used in phase image processing and compression applications including phase holograms.

키워드

과제정보

This work was partly supported by the Giga KOREA Project (GK20D0100, Development of Telecommunications Terminal with Digital Holographic Table-top Display, 50%) and Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2020-0000981, Development of Digital Holographic Metrology Technology for Phase Retrieval, 50%).

참고문헌

  1. P. Stepien, D. Korbuszewski, and M. Kujawinska, Digital holographic microscopy with extended field of view using tool for generic image stitching, ETRI J. 41 (2019), no. 1, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0499
  2. A. Kus et al., Holographic tomography: Hardware and software solutions for 3d quantitative biomedical imaging, ETRI J. 41 (2019), no. 1, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0505
  3. P. Schelkens et al., JPEG Pleno: Providing representation interoperability for holographic applications and devices, ETRI J. 41 (2019), no. 1, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0509
  4. J. H. Choi et al., Evolution of spatial light modulator for high-definition digital holography, ETRI J. 41 (2019), no. 1, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0523
  5. D. Gabor, A new microscopic principle, Nature 161 (1948), no. 4098, 777-778. https://doi.org/10.1038/161777a0
  6. E. N. Leith and J. Upatnieks, Reconstructed wavefronts and communication theory, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52 (1962), no. 10, 1123-1128. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.52.001123
  7. Y. Awatsuji et al., Parallel three-step phase-shifting digital holography, Appl. Opt. 45 (2006), no. 13, 2995-3002, https://www.osapublishing.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-45-13-2995 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.002995
  8. I. Yamaguchi and T. Zhang, Phase-shifting digital holography, Opt. Lett. 22 (1997), no. 16, 1268-1270, https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-22-16-1268 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001268
  9. B. R. Brown and A. W. Lohmann, Complex spatial filtering with binary masks, Appl. Opt. 5 (1966), no. 6, 967-969. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.5.000967
  10. K. Matsushima, H. Schimmel, and F. Wyrowski, Fast calculation method for optical diffraction on tilted planes by use of the angular spectrum of plane waves, J. Opt. Soc. A. 20 (2003), no. 94, 1755-1762. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.20.001755
  11. T. M. Kreis, Frequency analysis of digital holography, Opt. Eng. 41 (2002), no. 4, 771-778. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1458551
  12. E. Buckley, Holographic laser projection technology, in Proc. SID Symp. (Los Angeles, CA, USA), May 2008, pp. 1074-1078.
  13. R. W. Gerchberg and O. Saxton, A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures, Optik 35 (1971), no. 2, 237-246.
  14. P. W. M. Tsang, Y. T. Chow, and T.-C. Poon, Generation of phase-only Fresnel hologram based on downsampling, Opt. Express 22 (2014), no. 21, 25208-24214. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.025208
  15. P. W. M. Tsang and T.-C. Poon, Novel method for converting digital fresnel hologram to phase-only hologram based on bidirectional error diffusion, Opt. Express 21 (2013), no. 20, 23680-23686. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.023680
  16. A. Ahar et al., A new similarity measure for complex valued data, in Proc. Digit. Holography Three-Dimensional Imaging (JeJu Island, Republic of Korea), May 2017, article no. Tu1A.6.
  17. A. Ahar, A. Barri, and P. Schelkens, From sparse coding significance to perceptual quality: A new approach for image quality assessment, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27 (2018), no. 2, 879-893. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2771412
  18. A. Ahar et al., Performance evaluation of sparseness significance ranking measure (SSRM) on holographic content, in Proc. 3D Image Acquis. Disp.: Technol. Percep. Appl. 2018 (Orlando, FL, USA), June 2018, article no. JTu4A.10.
  19. D. Blinder et al., Open access database for experimental validations of holographic compression engines, in Proc. Int. Workshop Qual. Multimed. Exp. (Pilos, Greece), May 2015, pp. 1-6.
  20. A. Gilles et al., Computer generated hologram from Multiview-plus-depth data considering specular reflections, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimed. Expo Workshops (Seattle, WA, USA), July 2016, pp. 1-6.
  21. A. Gilles et al., Hybrid approach for fast occlusion processing in computer-generated hologram calculation, Appl. Opt. 55 (2016), no. 20, 5459-5470, http://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-55-20-5459 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.005459
  22. M. V. Bernardo et al., Holographic representation: Hologram plane vs. object plane, Signal Process. Image Commun. 68 (2018), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2018.08.006
  23. M. V. Bernardo et al., A digital hologram compression scheme for representation on the object plane, in Proc. SPIE Opt. Eng. + Appl. (San Diego, CA, USA), Sept. 2018, article no. 107520J.