DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the direction of mathematics education to improve the affective achievement of students

학생의 정의적 성취 신장을 위한 수학교육 개선 방향 탐색

  • Received : 2022.11.05
  • Accepted : 2022.11.17
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

It has been alerted that Korean students' mathematical affective achievement is very low. In order to solve this problem, various policies related to mathematical affective domains have been promoted, but it is necessary to examine various existing policies and explore the direction for improving them in more essential aspects. Based on previous studies that the growth mindset helps to increase students' affective achievement, this study focused on improving students' math-related growth mindset and ultimately exploring policies that can increase mathematical affective achievement. Therefore, the current status of mathematical affective achievement of Korean students was examined, and the policies and related cases in the mathematical affective domain were investigated. Based on the results, some keywords were derived and then the directions of policy for improving the math-related growth mindset and the affective achievement of students were suggested.

우리나라 학생들의 수학 정의적 성취도가 낮고 학년이 올라갈수록 학생들이 수학을 포기하는 비율이 증가한다는 점이 지속적으로 문제 제기되어 왔다. 이에 국가 기관이나 교육청, 학교 차원에서 다양한 수학 정의적 영역 관련 정책이 추진되어 왔으나, 더욱 본질적인 측면에서의 개선을 위해 기존의 여러 정책을 살펴보고 개선 방향을 탐색할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 성장 마인드셋이 정의적 성취의 신장에 도움을 준다는 선행연구에 기초하여, 학생의 수학에 관한 성장 마인드셋을 향상시켜서 궁극적으로 수학 정의적 성취를 신장시킬 수 있는 정책을 탐색하는 데 초점을 두었다. 이에, 먼저 문헌 연구를 통해 우리나라 학생들의 수학 정의적 성취 실태 및 변화 추이를 살펴보고, 국내외에서 이루어진 수학 정의적 영역 관련 정책 및 사례를 조사하였다. 그 결과를 토대로 키워드를 설정하여 수학 마인드셋 향상과 정의적 성취 신장을 위한 정책의 방향을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2021, 2022년 교육부의 재원으로 한국과학창의재단에서 수행한 연구의 일부 내용을 포함하여 보완한 것임.

References

  1. Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students' potential through creative math. Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints.
  2. Boaler, J., Dance, K., & Woodbury, E. (2018). From performance to learning: assessing to encourage growth mindsets. Youcubed, Stanford University.
  3. Chang, H., Lim, M., Yu, M., Park, H., Nam, J., Kim, H., Lee, H., Shin, S., Jeong, J., & Lee, S. (2018). A study on the development and application of family math program. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 22(4), 427-451.
  4. Cho, S., Ku, N. W., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Lee, I. (2019). OECD programme for international student assessment: an analysis of PISA 2018 results. KICE RRE 2019-11.
  5. Choe, S. H., Ku, J., Kim, J., Park, S., Oh, E., Kim, J., & Baek, H. (2013). Strategies for improving the affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS. KICE RRE 2013-18.
  6. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House.
  7. Drijvers, P. (2013). Digital technology in mathematics education: why it works (or doesn't). PNA, 8(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v8i1.6120
  8. Fey, J. T. (1989). 'School algebra for the year 2000', in S. Wagner and C. Kieran (Eds.) Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 199-213). Erlbaum.
  9. Hemmi, K., & Ryve, A. (2014). Effective mathematics teaching in Finnish and Swedish teacher education discourses. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9293-4
  10. Hong, O., Kim, J., Im, Y.,..., & Hwang, G. (2020). The development of artificial intelligence(AI) elementary school math class support system and operation plan. KOFAC.
  11. Hwang, J., Ko, E., & Tak, B. (2020). An analysis on home and school background factors in TIMSS 2015: focus on students with negative attitude toward mathematics. School Mathematics, 22(3), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2020.07.22.3.467
  12. Kang, N., Kim, H., Na, G., ..., & Oh, K. (2021). A study on the improvement direction of nurturing science talent through empirical analysis of mathematics and science education. KOFAC 2020JAB0001.
  13. Kim, D., Kim, Y., & Park, J. (2020). The development of a guide to teaching mathematical task. KOFAC BD200020002.
  14. Kim, H., Ku, B., Lee, S., ..., & Oh, S. (2021). Practicing affective domain assessment in classroom. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education.
  15. Kim, S. C., Kim, S. Y., Kim, H. Y., Son, J. H., Lee, G. S., Cho, H. G., & Huh, N. (2021). Development of mathematical assessment and correction model according to mathematics learning hierarchy. KOFAC.
  16. Kim, S. H., Kim, B. M., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Mathematics education and the affective domain. Kyongmunsa.
  17. Kim, S. I., & Shin, T. S. (2020). The effects of mindsets on academic achievement of middle school students mediated by academic self-efficacy: multi-group analysis according to whether the students are in low-income families or not. Asian Journal of Education, 21(3), 697-726. http://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2020.09.21.3.697
  18. Ko, H. K., Lee, H. C., Lee, H. S., Lee, E. J., Baek, S. G., Kim, H. S., Yun, K. L., Kim, Y. J., Jeong, S. H., Lee, S. J., & Lee, J. H. (2015). A research on the actual condition and improvement of mathematics learning. KOFAC.
  19. Ko, H. K., Kim, H. W., Kaji, S., & Choi, S. (2017). Elementary school students who give up on learning mathematics: correlations with noncognitive learner Characteristics. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(2), 143-151. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2017.20.2.143
  20. KOFAC (2021). Survey and analysis of the condition of mathematics education in 2020. KOFAC BD21020002.
  21. Lee, D., Lee, K., Ko, E., Kwon, S., Kim, D., Kim, Y., Park, J., Ku, N., & Lee, H. (2017). Designing and implementing tasks for inquiry in school mathematics. KOFAC BD18020001.
  22. Lee, H., Bong, C., Yoon, M., & Hong, S. (2018). An application of multilevel structural equation model to testing the effect of mathematics selfefficacy and educational environment on mathematical interest - comparison of results between Korea and Singapore. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 31(1), 353-386. http://doi.org/10.31158/JEEV.2018.31.1.353
  23. Lee, H., Kim, H., Ko, H., Park, J., Oh, S., Lee, S., Lim, M., Tak, B., & Hwang, J. (2021). A study on ways to improve students' mathematical affective achievement. KOFAC A22040003.
  24. Lee, H. C., Kim, H. W., Baeck, S., Ko, H. K., & Yi, H. S. (2017). A causal model analysis of non-cognitive characteristics of mathematics learning. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(2), 187-202. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2017.31.2.187
  25. Lee, K. H., Kim, D. W., Kim, S. H., ..., Choi, I. Y. (2021). A study on the future-oriented mathematics and curriculum organization for postCOVID-19. Ministry of Education.
  26. Lee, M. (2018. 3. 20.). "초등 1학년 교과서, 이건 좀 아쉽습니다". Ohmynews. Retrieved from http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002414489
  27. Lee, Y. (2016. 08. 23.). "새 초등 1~2학년 수학교과서, 페이지 줄어 더 어려워져". Yonhapnews. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20160823062100004
  28. Lemov, D. (2015). Teach like a champion 2.0. Jossey-Bass.
  29. Ministry of Education (2015a). The 2nd comprehensive plan for mathematics education. Ministry of Education.
  30. Ministry of Education (2015b). The 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education.
  31. Ministry of Education (2021a). The results of the national assessment of educational achievement in 2020. MoE press release (2021.6.). Ministry of Education.
  32. Ministry of Education (2021b). The main points of the 2022 revised curriculum (draft). Ministry of Education.
  33. MoEST (2012). The national mathematics education advance plan. MoEST.
  34. MoE in Singapore (2020). Curriculum planning and development division: mathematics syllabus primary one to six. MoE in Singapore.
  35. Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding "meaning" in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192-203. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
  36. Nam, J. (2015). A study on aims for affective development in national curriculum of mathematics. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 19(2), 159-178.
  37. Nam, S. I., Ryu, S. R., & Baek, S. S. (2003). The effects of the use of calculations in elementary school mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 42(3), 403-417.
  38. OECD (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/faq/
  39. Ontario Ministry of Education (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1-8 mathematics. Queen's Printer for Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Education.
  40. Pang, J. S., & Lee, Y. J. (2019). An analysis of first graders' responses to the problems of the mathematics workbook. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(3), 1369-1394. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.3.1369
  41. Park, K. M., Lee, H. C., Park, S. H., ..., & Yeo, M. J. (2015). A study on the development of drafts for the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum II. KOFAC BD15120005.
  42. Park, R. S., Kwon, J. K., & Lee, D. Y. (2019). The effects of engineering tools on students' math academic achievement and math learning attitude in middle school mathematics geometrical unit. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(12), 67-75. http://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.12.067
  43. Sang, K., Kim, K., Park, S., Jeon, S., Park, M., & Lee, J. (2020). The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS): finding from TIMSS 2019 for Korea. KICE RRE 2020-10.
  44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: a theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational application. Routledge.
  45. Seo, M., Kim, K., Jeon, S., Lee, J., Park, M., Kim, S., ..., & Kim, D. (2021). The mathematics and science achievement characteristics of Korean students in the results of TIMSS 2019. KICE ORM 2021-30.
  46. Tavenner, D. (2021). Prepared: what kids need for a fulfilled life. Broadway Business.
  47. Woollett, K., & Maguire, E. A. (2011). Acquiring 'the knowledge' of London's layout drives structural brain changes. Current Biology, 21(24), 2109-2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.018
  48. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Lawrence Erlbaum Association.