International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication

The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Data mining and Copyright

  • Kim, Kyungsuk (Department of Intellectual Property, Sangmyung University)
  • Received : 2022.08.11
  • Accepted : 2022.08.17
  • Published : 2022.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Data mining has broad applications that reach beyond scholarly and scientific research and provide internet search engine services that are commonly used forms of Text and Data Mining('TDM') of websites. The exceptions and limitations for data mining provide a competitive advantage in the global race for policy innovation because it permits researchers to conduct computational analysis - TDM on any materials to which they have access. For this purpose, Japan and the EU added limitations on copyright to legalize some TDM research through amendments to copyright law, and the U.S. copyright law has allowed data mining by the fair use provision. On the other hand, there are no explicit exceptions and limitations for data mining under the Korean Copyright Act, and there are no cases considering data mining fair use. We review comparatively exceptions and limitations on copyright which will help to encourage AI-related business by using more data smoothly through the mining process and extracting more valuable information.

Keywords

References

  1. Kibbm Lee and Seok-Jae Moon, "Experience Way of Artificial Intelligence PLAY Educational Model for Elementary School Students," International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication Vol.12 No.4 232-237, https://doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2020.12.4.232, Published: 2020.
  2. Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC
  3. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases.
  4. Thomas Margoni & Martin Kretschmer, "A Deeper Look into the EU Text and Data Mining Exceptions: Harmonisation, Data Ownership, and the Future of Technology," GRUR International, Volume 71, Issue 8, August 2022, at 685-701, https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac054, Published: 26 July 2022
  5. Christophe Geiger, Giancarlo Frosio, Oleksandr Bulayenko, "The EXCEPTION FOR TEXT AND DATA MINING (TDM) IN THE PROPOSED DIRECTIVE ON COPYRIGHT IN THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET - LEGAL ASPECTS," Center for International Intellectual Property Studies Research Paper No. 2018-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160586 Published: March 2, 2018.
  6. Christophe Geiger, Giancarlo Frosio, Oleksandr Bulayenko, "The EXCEPTION FOR TEXT AND DATA MINING (TDM) IN THE PROPOSED DIRECTIVE ON COPYRIGHT IN THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET - LEGAL ASPECTS," Center for International Intellectual Property Studies Research Paper No. 2018-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160586 Published: March 2, 2018.
  7. Maria Bottis Marinos Papadopoulos, Christos Zampakolas & Paraskevi Ganatsiou, "Text and Data Mining in the EU Acquis Communautaire Tinkering with TDM & Digital Legal Deposit." 12 Erasmus L. Rev. 190, 2019, at 196-198. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000140 Published: 2019
  8. FireSabre Consulting LLC v. Sheehy, No. 11-cv-4719 (CS), 2013 WL 5420977, at 7 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 2013).
  9. Arrow Productions, Ltd., v. The Weinstein Company, 44 F. Supp. 3d 359 (S.D.N.Y. 2014);. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539, 549, 105 S.Ct. 2218, 85 L.Ed.2d 588 (1985), Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Limited
  10. Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014); Dominick Ranieri v. Adirondack Dev. Group LLC, No. 1.11-cv-1013-GTS-CFH (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2016).
  11. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, 1169 (9th Cir. 2007); Arriba Soft Corp Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811, 819 (9th Cir. 2003).
  12. Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811, 822 (9th Cir. 2003).
  13. Authors Guild v. Google, 770 F.Supp.2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).
  14. Folsom v. Marsh, 9F.Cas. 342, 348 (C.C.D. Mass. 1841); Harper & Row, 471 U.S.539, 562 (1985).
  15. Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694, 708 (2nd Cir. 2013).
  16. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,510 U.S. 569, 579 (1994).
  17. Castle Rock Entm't, Inc. v. Carol Pub. Grp., Inc., 150 F.3d 132, 142 (2d Cir. 1998)
  18. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,510 U.S. 569, 586 (1994).
  19. Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811, 822 (9th Cir. 2003).
  20. Authors guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust 755 F.3d 87,97 (2nd Cir. 2014).
  21. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,510 U.S. 569, 586-87(1994).
  22. Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811, 813 (9th Cir. 2003).
  23. Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. 336 F.3d 811, 821 (9th Cir. 2003).
  24. Authors guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust 755 F.3d 87, 97 (2nd Cir. 2014).
  25. Harper&Row Publishers Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471U.S.at568
  26. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d at 99 (citing Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 591 (1994)).
  27. Brief of Digital Humanities and Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Partial Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 755F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014) (No. 11 Civ. 06351); Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. (Google Books), 804 F.3d 202, 222-223 (2d. Cir. 2015).
  28. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d at 99 (citing Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605, 614 (2d Cir. 2006))
  29. Castle Rock Entm't, Inc. v. Carol Pub. Grp., Inc., 150 F.3d 132, 142 (2d Cir. 1998)
  30. Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87, 90 (2d Cir. 2014).
  31. Act No 30 of 25 May 2018. See in detail Japan Copyright Office (JCO), 'Outline of the Amendments to the Copyright Act in 2018' (2019)4 Patents & Licensing 10, 12 (footnote 8).
  32. Referring to the translation see Japan Copyright Office (n 30), at 11-12.
  33. Tatsuhiro Ueno, "The Flexible Copyright Exception for 'Non-Enjoyment' Purposes - Recent Amendment in Japan and Its Implication", GRUR International, 70(2), 2021, 145-152. at 148, https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa184 Published: January 17, 2021
  34. See Bunkachoˆ -Chosakukenka, 'Chonsankenhoˆ no Ichibu wo Kaiseisuru Horitsu (Heisei 30-nen Kaisei) nitsuite' [The Act to Amend the Copyright Act in 2018] (2018) 692 Kopiraito [Copyright] 34.
  35. Saramin case [Seoul Hight Court Decision 2016Na2019365] ; Job Korea v. Saramin case [Seoul Hight Court Decision 2016Na2019365] ; Nulls-Job case [Seoul Central District Court Decision 2018Kahap528464] ; Everytime v. Spec-up-ad case [Seoul Hight Court Decision 2020Na2036862]
  36. Yanolja v. Yogi-eottae [Supreme Court 2021Do1433 (Criminal case); Seoul High Court 2021Na2034740 (Civil Case)]