DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithm to Design Architectural Layouts

건축배치형태 대안 생성을 위한 다중 목적의 진화 알고리즘 연구

  • Received : 2022.05.16
  • Accepted : 2022.10.12
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

This research aims to propose an efficient genetic algorithm model that generates a high-quality set of alternatives in architectural design where various objectives interact and compete. By integrating a novel location-based genotyping expression approach into an architectural design domain, an automated model would generate architectural layout forms using a genetic algorithm. Depending on the degree of fitness to the architectural layout form, the initialization and crossover method based on adjacent nodes proposed in this study exhibited different morphological characteristics. However, both quickly accomplished the desired result. The evolutionary algorithm and the fitness function for evaluating architectural layouts provided the opportunity to rapidly produce the best alternatives out of a large pool of options by evaluating user requirements and properties as used during the preliminary stages of architectural design. In a generating environment where many degrees of fitness are applied simultaneously and that contribute to fitness, the Pareto optimal method was utilized to provide balanced alternatives between multiple user requirements.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단 기초연구사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No 2020R1I1A3067232)

References

  1. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61(3) 183-193 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054663
  2. Berlyne, D.E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 279-286 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212593
  3. Boselie, F. (1997). The golden section and the shape of objects. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15(2), 131-141 https://doi.org/10.2190/42P6-W58D-E9VG-1N0V
  4. Chaillou, S. (2019). AI & Architecture: An Experimental Perspective, Harvard Graduate School of Design.
  5. Chang, D., & Park, J (2018). Quantifying the visual experience of three-dimensional built environments, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 17:1, 117-124 https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.117
  6. Ching, F. (2016). Archigecture: Form, Space, & Order, 4th ed, Canada, Wiley
  7. Choi, M., & Chang, S. (2013). Comparative analysis on the heating and cooling loads associated with U-value, SHGC and orientation of the windows in different Regions, Journal of the KIEAE 13(2),123-130
  8. Davis S T., & Jahnke J C. (1991). Unity and the golden section: rules for aesthetic choice? The American Journal of Psychology, 104:257-257. doi: 10.2307/1423158
  9. Doulgerakis, A. (2007). Genetic Programming + Unfolding Embryology in Automated Layout Planning. Computer Science., September, 2007
  10. Galle, P. (1981). An algorithm for the exhaustive generation of building floor plans, Comm. of the ACM, 24(12), 813-825. https://doi.org/10.1145/358800.358804
  11. Jo, J., & Gero, J. (1998). Space layout planning using evolutionary approach, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12, 149-162 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-1810(97)00037-X
  12. Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. 1992 ed., The MIT Press.
  13. Jacobson, M. Z. (2005). Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  14. Kim, J. (2017). Positioning blueprints with moving least squares pptimization. Journal of the Korea Computer Graphics Society, 23(4),1-9 https://doi.org/10.15701/KCGS.2017.23.4.1
  15. Kang, I., Moon, J., & Park, J. (2017). Recent research trends of artificial intelligent machine learning in architectural field - Review of domestic and international journal papers, Journal of The Architectural Institute Of Korea Structure & Construction, 33(4), 63-68 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2017.33.4.63
  16. Kim, S., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Improvement of energy efficiency in wood frame house with energy efficient methods. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, 41(1), 77-86 https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2013.41.1.77
  17. Lee, Y., & Jun, H. (2018). A basic study for application of artificial intelligence technology in BIM architectural planning., Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(1), 100-103
  18. Michalek J., Choudhary, R., & Papalambros P. (2002) Architectural layout design optimization, Engineering Optimization, 34:5, 461-484 https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150214016
  19. Liggett, R. (1985). Optimal spatial arrangement as a quadratic assignment problem. Design Optimization, 1-40. Elsevier
  20. Livio, M. (2002). The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World''s Most Astonishing Number, Broadway Books
  21. Mitra, N., & Pauly, M. (2008). Symmetry for architectural design. First Symposium on Architectural Geometry, Vienna, Austria, September 13-16, 2008
  22. Moon, B (2017). Easy-to-learn genetic algorithms: an evolutionary approach, Hanbit Academy
  23. Pappa, G., & Freitas, A. (2010). Evolutionary Algorithms. Natural Computing Series. Berlin, Springer,
  24. Stamps, A. E. (2000). Psychology and the Aesthetics of the Built Environment, New York, Springer, 3-18
  25. Steadman, P. (1979). The Evolution of Designs Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,