DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A GTAP Model Analysis of the Effects of RCEP on the Korean Manufacturing Business

GTAP모형을 이용한 RCEP 발효가 한국 제조업에 미치는 영향분석

  • Yong-jie Gui (Department of International Trade, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoon-Say Jeong (Department of International Trade, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2022.10.07
  • Accepted : 2022.10.30
  • Published : 2022.10.30

Abstract

This study aim to use the GTAP model to analyze the impact of RCEP Fermentation in the Korean manufacturing industry by quantifying the RCEP tariff commitment table. The research results show RCEP has boosted output in all sub-manufactures except wood and printed matter due to increased export volumes. Wood products, on the other hand, are more reliant on imports due to lower production due to lower domestic sales or overall exports. After RCEP came into effect, the import and export scale of Korea's manufacturing industry expanded effectively. Among them, the positive impact on the intensive low-tech manufacturing industries such as clothing and leather products, wood products and printing products, and food, beverage and tobacco products is greater than the positive impact on the technology-intensive medium and high-tech and high-tech manufacturing industries. And found that the growth rate of Korea's manufacturing trade is basically proportional to the tax reduction rate of RCEP. Finally, in order to promote the development of the manufacturing industry, some suggestions are put forward that need the government's policy support and strengthen the regional cooperation with RCEP member countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed Y.N, H Delin , B.G Reeberg and V. Shaker(2020), "Is the RCEP a Cornerstone or Just Collaboration? Regional General Equilibrium Model Based on GAMS", Journal of Korea Trade, 24(1), 171-207.
  2. Ha, Young-Kyou(2022), " A Study on the Effect and Prospects of the RCEP-Focusing on the Automobile SCM-", the Korean Academy For Trade Credit Insurance, 23(2), 53-66.
  3. Jin, B. J.(2020), "Possibility to Utilize RCEP Multilateral Cumulation : Focusing on Manufacturing Business Investment and Raw Materials Trade Trends", The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 21(3), 67-84.
  4. Ko, Jong-Hwan(2013) ," The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia and Its Economic Effects: A CGE Approach", International Regional Studies, 17(4), 1-21.
  5. Ko, Jong-Hwan(2015), "RCEP vs. TPP: Which One Would Be More Beneficial to Korea Economically", Journal of Korea Trade, 11(4), 51-70.
  6. Kang, Bo-Kyung(2017), " A Foreign Trade Effect Analysis of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and South Korea", Journal of International Trade & Commerc, 13(6), 235-248.
  7. Ko Jonghwan and Ha Jongwook (2021), "RCEP and Its Impact on the Global Economy: A CGE Approach",Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pukyong National University.21(1), 355-377.
  8. Kim, Yeong-Gil and Jie Song (2022), "RCEP vs. TPP: Which One Would Be More Beneficial to Korea Economically", ournal of Korea Trade, 11(4), 51-70.
  9. Kim Jong-kwon(2022), " The Study on the Impact of RCEP on Korean trade and Countermeasures", The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 23(2), 123-141.
  10. Liu, Bing and Shumei Chen(2014), "Research on economic effects of reducing TBT under RCEP framework, an empirical analysis based on GTAP model", Journal of International Trade, 6, 91-98.
  11. Li Jinye and Jialin Hu(2021), "The Impact of RCEP Agreement on Macroeconomic and Manufacturing Development--Based on GTAP Simulation Analysis", Industrial Technology Economics 40(06), 134-142.
  12. Liu Zhuguang and Cheng Shijie(2022), "Research on the status quo, problems and countermeasures of cooperation between China and other RCEP member countries in the automobile industry", Guangxi Social Sciences(08),72-80.
  13. Ling Dan and Caiyun Lv(2022), "Research on the Impact of RCEP on China's Manufacturing Output and Trade: Based on GTAP Simulation", iBusiness, 14(2), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2022.142004
  14. Moon H.C and Qiaomin Lin(2018), "The Trade and Income Effects of RCEP: Implications for China and Korea", Journal of Korea Trade,22(3), 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-03-2018-0020
  15. Meng Xiaohua and jun Xu(2022), " Empirical analysis of the economic effects of RCEP hedge CPTPP in China and other member states", Guangxi Social Sciences(06),74-85.
  16. Narayanan, B. G., R.Sen, and S. Srivastava(2019),Tariff liberalization in the RCEP trade agreement and impact on India's automobile industry: An applied general equilibrium analysis (ARTNeT Working Paper Series. No. 183). Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), Bangkok.
  17. Petri P. A and M G. Mega Plummer(2019),"Regional Agreements and Their Impact on Australia . Australian Economic Review",52(4), 468-475.
  18. Park C.Y, P. A Petri and M.G Plummer(2021), " The Economics of Conflict and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: RCEP, CPTPP and the US-China Trade War", East Asian Economic Review, 25(3), 233-272. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2021.25.3.397
  19. Sung, Han-kyung(2015), " Study on Dynamic Economic Effects of the TPP and TTIP to Korea, China, and Japan", Research on market economy, 44(1), 93-124.
  20. Seo, J. H. and Kim, H.(2021), "An Analysis of Factors Behind Joining or Not Joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) : Cases of South Korea, China, Japan, and India", Korea and Global Affairs, 5(6), 131-168. https://doi.org/10.22718/KGA.2021.5.6.006
  21. Wilson J D. Mega(2015), "regional trade deals in the Asia-Pacific: choosing between the TPP and RCEP?". Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(2), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.956138
  22. Zhang Yuren and Xuedang Zhang(2017), " GTAP simulation analysis of the economic effects of TPP and RCEP", Gournal of Chongqing University( Social Science Edition), 23(5), 1-9.
  23. Zhou L., Pan, C., He, J., and Li, S.(2021). The Impact of RCEP on Chinese Regional Economy From Global Value Chains Perspective.(Unpublished Paper), China, MA: Tsinghua University.