DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transformation of Legal Personality in the Context of the Development of Modern Digital Technologies

  • Amelin, Roman (N.G. Chernyshevsky Saratov National Research State University) ;
  • Channov, Sergey (Volga Region Institute of Management named after P.A. Stolypin - branch of Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration) ;
  • Dobrobaba, Marina (O.E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University) ;
  • Kalinina, Larisa (Russian Customs Academy) ;
  • Kholodnaya, Elena (O.E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University)
  • Received : 2022.11.05
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

The article explores the prospects and trends for the transformation of some basic concepts of law associated with the development of artificial intelligence systems and the problems of liability for harm caused by a robot. The prospects, conditions and consequences of vesting robots with partial (quasi) or full legal personality are explored. This process should lead to a revision of the concepts of will, subjective side and legal responsibility in the direction of their greater universalization. The legally significant signs of will, legal personality, legal liability in relation to robots, artificial intelligence systems and other complex automated information systems are clarified. The author identifies the following essential factors of legal qualification of an act committed by a robot: goals, reasons for setting goals, connections between the planned result and the action taken, the actual result, the reasons for the difference between the actual result and the planned one. The article pays special attention to the preventive function of legal liability, which, when applied to robot subjects, can be expressed in the following basic procedures. 1. Accounting for legal requirements in the behavior of the robot. 2. Timely adaptation of the robot to changes in legislation and other regulatory legal acts that affect its behavior. 3. Accounting for incidents. 4. Destruction of a series of robots whose actions lead to unacceptable consequences.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research within the framework of the scientific project No. 20-011-00355 ("The evolution of law under the influence of modern digital technologies").

References

  1. Gracheva, Y. V., Aryamov, A. A.: Robotization and artificial intelligence: Criminal and legal risks in the field of public security. Actual Problems of Russian Law 15(6), 169-178 (2020) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.115.6.169-178
  2. Karlash, D. S.: Law of robots: Metaphysical and socioeconomic aspects. Entrepreneurial Law. Appendix "Law and Business" 4, 9-14 (2018).
  3. Ponomareva, E. V.: Subjects and quasi-subjects of law: theoretical and legal problems of differentiation. PhD theses, Ural State Law University, Yekaterinburg (2019).
  4. Arkhipov, V. V., Naumov, V. B.: On some issues of theoretical foundations for the development of legislation on robotics: Aspects of will and legal personality. Law 5, 157-170 (2017).
  5. Mikhaleva, E. S., Shubina, E. A.: Problems and prospects of legal regulation of robotics. Actual problems of Russian law 12, 26-35 (2016).
  6. Neznamov, A. V., Naumov, V. B.: Strategy for regulation of robotics and cyber-physical systems. Law 2, 69-89 (2018).
  7. Yeung, K.: Responsibility and AI. Council of Europe Study DGI (2019). https://rm.coe.int/responsibility-and-aien/168097d9c5 (access date: September 16, 2022).
  8. Russell, S. J., Norvig, P.: Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson Education Limited, Malaysia (2016).
  9. Scherer, M. U.: Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks challenges competencies and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 29(2), 354-400 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609777
  10. Begishev, I. R.: Limits of criminal law regulation of robotics. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Law 12(3), 522-543 (2021) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.303
  11. Shubinsky, I. B.: Functional reliability of information systems: Analysis methods. Reliability, Moscow (2012).
  12. Kovaleva, N. N. (ed.): Problems and challenges of the digital society: Trends in the development of legal regulation of digital transformations, vol. 2. Saratov State Law Academy, Saratov (2020).
  13. Armstrong, J., Green, K.: Forecasting methods and principles: Evidence-based checklists. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 28(2), 103-159 (2018) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2018.1441735
  14. Tyler, T. R.: Methodology in legal research. Utrecht Law Review 13(3), 130-141 (2017) http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.410
  15. European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers: Liability for artificial intelligence and other emerging digital technologies. Publications Office (2019). https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/573689 (access date: September 16, 2022).
  16. Bryson, J. J.., Theodorou, A.: How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence. In: Toivonen, M., Saari, E. (eds.) Human-centered digitalization and services, Translational systems sciences, vol. 19, pp. 305-323. Springer, Singapore (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_16
  17. Barakina, E. Y.: Regulatory platforms in the field of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence. Actual problems of Russian law 6, 77-87 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.127.6.077-087
  18. Cerka, P., Grigiene, J., Sirbikyte, G.: Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems? Computer Law & Security Review 33(5), 685-699 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.022
  19. Hallevy, G.: The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities - From science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal 4(2), 171-220 (2010).
  20. Kapitonov, A., Lonshakov, S., Bulatov, V., Montazam, B. K., White, J.: Robot-as-a-Service: From cloud to peering technologies. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8, 560829 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.560829
  21. Meng, G.: Ancient law, its connection with the ancient history of society and its relation to the latest ideas. D.E. Kozhanchikov, St. Petersburg (1873).
  22. Myskin, A. V.: Branch of a legal entity as a quasi-subject of civil law. Civil Law 1, 6-9 (2014).
  23. Babajanov, I. H.: Human life and death as institutional and legal categories (theoretical-axiological and private law analysis). PhD theses, Tajik National University, Dushanbe (2014).
  24. Belov, V. A., Blinkovsky, K. A.: Civil law regulation of corporate relations with the participation of civilly incompetent (without legal personality) organizations. In: Belov, V. A. (ed.) Corporate law: Actual problems of theory and practice, pp. 162-225. Yurayt, Moscow (2009).
  25. European Parliament resolution of February 16, 2017. Civil law rules on robotics. https://robotrends.ru/images/1725/66137/201706722_Resolution_and_Charter_EU_RoboTrendsru.pdf (access date: September 16, 2022).
  26. Neznamov, A. V. (ed.): Regulation of robotics: An introduction to "robolaw". Legal aspects of the development of robotics and artificial intelligence technologies. Infotropic Media, Moscow (2018).
  27. Antonov, A. A.: Unmanned vehicles as sources of increased danger. Transport Law 4, 7-10 (2021).
  28. Efremov, E. V., Koltykov, A. N., Kokhan, V. V.: Development of proposals for the classification of medical robotic complexes for military purposes. National Security and Strategic Planning 2, 87-90 (2017).
  29. Gabov, A. V., Khavanova, I. A.: Autonomy of combat robots and law. Perm Legal Almanac 2, 361-378 (2019).
  30. Skvoznikov, A. N.: On free will and the ability to imputation in Russian legal science in the 19th - early 20th centuries. Legal Bulletin of Samara University 6(1), 87-92 (2020) https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-1-87-92
  31. Vitushko, V. A.: The concept and meaning of freedom of will in law. In: Mankovsky, I. A. (ed.) Society, law, personality: Issues of interaction in the modern world, pp 13-18. International University "MITSO", Minsk (2017).
  32. Rumak, V.: The so-called optimization is the road to nowhere [Interview with V.M. Zhuikov]. Law 1, 6-17 (2018).
  33. Goebel, R.: Explainable artificial intelligence: Concepts, applications, research challenges and visions. In: Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A., Weippl, E. (eds.) Machine learning and knowledge extraction. CD-MAKE 2020. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 12279, pp. 1-16. Springer, Cham (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57321-8_1
  34. Alekseev, S. S.: Problems of the theory of law, vol. 1. Yuridicheskaya literatura, Moscow (1982).
  35. Dugenets, A. S.: Administrative responsibility in Russian law. PhD theses, Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Moscow (2005).
  36. Vasilyev, A.: Ethical and legal aspects of robotics: A European perspective. The central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1(5), 113-120 (2019).
  37. Khan, S. N., Loukil, F., Ghedira-Guegan, C., Benkhelifa, E., Bani-Hani, A.: Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 14, 2901-2925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01127-0
  38. Akhmedov, A. Y.: On the issue of the signs of a smart contract as a contractual structure. Law and Digital Economy 2, 22-25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17803/2618-8198-2020-08-2-022-025
  39. Churilov, A. Y.: On the problem of the concept and legal nature of a smart contract. Lawyer 7, 25-30 (2020).
  40. Kuznetsova, S. S.: Topical issues of implementation and protection of human rights in the practice of using smart contract technology. Enforcement 6(1), 134-149 (2022) https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(1).134-149
  41. Somova, E. V.: Smart contract in contract law. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2, 79-85 (2019).