축산식품과학과 산업

  • 제11권2호
  • /
  • Pages.21-29
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2287-3686(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2635-4594(eISSN)
한국축산식품학회 (Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources)
권호 표지

저탄소 축산식품 인증제도 도입을 위한 활용기술

Current and Future Technologies for Low-Carbon Livestock Products

  • 정다운 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 김영순 (전주대학교 탄소연구소) ;
  • 황인호 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학과)
  • Jeong, Dawoon (Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Young soon (Institute of Carbon Technology, University of Jeonju) ;
  • Hwang, Inho (Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

키워드

과제정보

본 연구원고는 농촌진흥청 연구과제(과제번호: PJ017020032022) 수행결과의 일부임을 알려드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Randolph TF, Schelling E, Grace D, Nicholson CF, Leroy JL, Cole DC, et al. 2007. Invited review: Role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries1,2,3. Journal of Animal Science 85(11):2788-800. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0467
  2. Poore J, Nemecek T. 2018. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392):987-992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
  3. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision.
  4. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar TD, Castel V, Rosales M, Rosales M, et al. 2006. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options: Food & Agriculture Org.
  5. Pachauri R. 2008. Global warning! The impact of meat production and consumption on climate change. Peter Roberts Memorial Lecture: 8, London.
  6. Pais DF, Marques AC, Fuinhas JA. 2020. Reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change and promote health: But is it good for the economy? Environmental Modeling & Assessment 25(6):793-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09710-0
  7. Laestadius LI, Neff RA, Barry CL, Frattaroli S. 2016. No meat, less meat, or better meat: Understanding NGO messaging choices intended to alter meat consumption in light of climate change. Environmental Communication 10(1):84-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.981561
  8. 농림축산식품부. 2021. 2050 농식품 탄소중립 추진전략.
  9. De Vries M, de Boer IJ. 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128(1-3):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007
  10. Wiedemann S, McGahan E, Murphy C, Yan M. 2015. Resource use and environmental impacts from beef production in eastern Australia investigated using life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science 56(5):882-894. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14687
  11. Wiedemann S, McGahan EJ, Murphy CM. 2016. Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production assessed using life-cycle assessment. 1. Greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Production Science 56(9):1418-1431. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15881
  12. Asem-Hiablie S, Battagliese T, Stackhouse-Lawson KR, Alan Rotz C. 2019. A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of a beef system in the USA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24(3):441-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1464-6
  13. Berton M, Agabriel J, Gallo L, Lherm M, Ramanzin M, Sturaro E. 2017. Environmental footprint of the integrated France-Italy beef production system assessed through a multi-indicator approach. Agricultural Systems 155:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.005
  14. Hessle A, Bertilsson J, Stenberg B, Kumm K-I, Sonesson U. 2017. Combining environmentally and economically sustainable dairy and beef production in Sweden. Agricultural Systems 156:105-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.004
  15. USDA. Ag Data commons, Available from: https://data.nal.usda.gov/
  16. MLA. Developing a Life Cycle Inventory for Australian Agriculture 2013, Available from: https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/reports/2013/developing-a-life-cycle-inventory-for-australian-agriculture/
  17. 농촌진흥청. 2020. 저탄소 농축산물 인증제 참여를 위한 반추가축 축산물 LCI DB 기반 구축.
  18. Capper JL, editor The Carbon Footprint of Beef Production. 64th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference; June 19-22, Kansas State University Manhattan.
  19. Sithyphone K, Yabe M, Horita H, Hayashi K, Fumita T, Shiotsuka Y, et al. 2011. Comparison of feeding systems: feed cost, palatability and environmental impact among hay-fattened beef, consistent grass-onlyfed beef and conventional marbled beef in Wagyu (Japanese Black cattle). Animal Science Journal 82(2):352-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00836.x
  20. Beauchemin K, Kreuzer M, O'mara F, McAllister T. 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2):21-7. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07199
  21. Bannink A, Smits M, Kebreab E, Mills JA, Ellis J, Klop A, et al. 2010. Simulating the effects of grassland management and grass ensiling on methane emission from lactating cows. The Journal of Agricultural Science 148(1):55-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990499
  22. Haque MN. 2018. Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 60(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-018-0175-7
  23. Almeida AK, Hegarty RS, Cowie A. 2021. Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems. Animal Nutrition 7(4):1219-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.09.005
  24. EPA. Global Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emission Projections & Mitigation :2015-2050. In: Agency USEP, ed. Office of Atmospheric Programs (6207A) Washington, DC 200052019.
  25. Mofijur M, Fattah IR, Kumar PS, Siddiki SYA, Rahman SA, Ahmed S, et al. 2021. Bioenergy recovery potential through the treatment of the meat processing industry waste in Australia. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 9(4):105657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105657
  26. Otero A, Mendoza M, Carreras R, Fernandez B. 2021. Biogas production from slaughterhouse waste: Effect of blood content and fat saponification. Waste Management 133:119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.035
  27. USDA. 2022. Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, Available from: https://www.usda.gov/climatesolutions/climate-smart-commodities
  28. Defra. 2022. Sustainable Farming Incentive, Available from: https://defrafarming.blog.gov.uk/sustainablefarming-incentive-pilot-guidance/
  29. DCCEEW. (2022년 10월 현재). Methods for the Emissions Reduction Fund, Available from: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction/emissions-reduction-fund/methods
  30. DCCEEW. (2022년 2월). MERiL program awards $4 million to support low-emissions livestock feed R&D, Available from: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/news/meril-program-awards-4-million-to-supportlow-emissions-livestock-feed-rd
  31. Albert MM. 2020. Research for the AGRI committee - The farm to fork strategy implications for agriculture and the CAP. European Parliamentary Research Service, 2020-05-15.
  32. Chen G, Maraseni T, Banhazi T, Bundschuh J. 2015. Benchmarking energy use on farm. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC).
  33. Japan. 2020. Environment Innovation Strategy. In: Japan Pmsoo, editor.
  34. EPIS. 스마트팜코리아 , Available from: https://www.smartfarmkorea.net
  35. Japan-Cabinet. 2020. Green Growth Strategy through Achieving Carbon Neutrality in 2050.
  36. Eory V, Maire J, MacLeod M, Sykes A, Barnes A, Rees R, et al. 2020. Non-CO2 abatement in the UK agricultural sector by 2050: Summary report submitted to support the 6th carbon budget in the UK.
  37. Reisinger A, Clark H, Abercrombie RM, Aspin M, Ettema P, Harris M, et al. 2018. Future options to reduce biological GHG emissions on-farm: critical assumptions and national-scale impact: New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre.
  38. 축산과학원-한우연구소. Available from: https://www.nias.go.kr
  39. Australia Fedral Register of Legislation-ERF(Emission Reduction Fund), Available from: https://business.gov.au/grants-and-programs/Emissions-Reduction-Fund
  40. National Farmers Union N. 2019. Achieving Net Zero: Farming's 2040 Goal.
  41. Sohi S, Loez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R. 2009. Biochar's roles in soil and climate change: A review of research needs. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report 5(09):1-57.
  42. Biomass Controls, LLC, USA, NativeEnergy, USA.
  43. Skerman A, Tait S. 2018. Bioenergy support program-DAF transition. Final Report Prepared for Pork CRC Project 4C-116.
  44. Roque BM, Brooke CG, Ladau J, Polley T, Marsh LJ, Najafi N, et al. 2019. Effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on methane production and rumen microbiome assemblage. Animal Microbiome 1(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-019-0003-5
  45. DSM. 2019. Taking action on climate change, together: Summary of scientific research how 3-NOP effectively reduces enteric methane emissions from cows.
  46. Cargill. 2021. Cargill and ZELP embark on strategic partnership to tackle methane emissions in the dairy industry 2021, Available from: https://www.cargill.com/2021/cargill-and-zelp-embark-on-strategicpartnership
  47. DPIRD GoWA. 2022. Breeding for lower greenhouse gas emissions 2022, Available from: https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/climate-land-water/breeding-lower-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  48. Lassen J, Difford GF. 2020. Genetic and genomic selection as a methane mitigation strategy in dairy cattle. Animal 14:s473-s83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120001561
  49. Rhee C, Kim DW, Yu SI, Lee ME, Shin J, Kim H-W, et al. 2021. Biogas potential assessment and characterization of Korean slaughterhouse waste for anaerobic digestion. Environmental Technology & Innovation 24:101858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101858
  50. Heller M. 2017. Food production environmental footprint literature summery: Packaging and wasted food. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality: Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan.
  51. FAO. 2019. Five practical actions towards low-carbon livestock.