Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural Performance Assessment of Buildings Considering Beam Discontinuity and Horizontal Irregularity under Wind and Earthquake Loads

보부재 불연속성과 수평비정형성을 고려한 건물의 풍하중과 지진하중에 의한 응답해석

  • 수딥타 차크라보르티 (공주대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 앰디 라지불 이스람 (공주대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 김두기 (공주대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.27
  • Accepted : 2022.09.19
  • Published : 2022.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Irregularity in structural shape is a ubiquitous phenomenon. Structural hazards evoked from irregularity need to be checked against extreme lateral loadings. Structures containing four distinct types of irregularities in terms of continuity and discontinuity in upper half-length and all story levels along with O-shape are investigated. The structures were analyzed numerically and different seismic responses such as displacements, bending moment, axial forces, torsions, story drift, etc. were scrutinized. The seismic and wind load analysis was conducted for ACI 318-11 conditions. Results show that buildings having discontinuous beams on the upper half exhibit better resilience. It is also concluded that O-shaped building structures provide better resistance to overturning, making this shape relatively safe.

구조물의 비정형성이 풍하중과 지진하중을 받는 구조물의 안전성에 미치는 영향에 대해 검토하였다. 층별 보부재의 불연속성과 O자형 수평비정형성의 관점에서 4가지 유형의 구조물을 선정하여 구조거동을 평가하였다. ACI 318-11 조건에 대해 풍하중 및 지진하중에 의한 구조물의 변위, 휨모멘트, 축력, 비틀림, 층간변위 응답을 검토하였다. 보부재 불연속성을 갖는 구조물의 상부에 갖는 건물이 가장 큰 복원력을 보였으며, O자형 수평비정형 건물은 전도에 대한 저항이 크므로 횡하중에 대해 안전하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT). (No. 2021R1A4A1031509).

References

  1. Archana, A. R., and Akbar, M. A. (2021), Structural irregularity quantification in buildings using vital signs. In Structures. Elsevier. 34, 2592-2599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021. 09.026
  2. Kumar, T. S., and Sreevalli, I. Y. (2020), Numerical study on flexural performance of RC beam with various confinement pattern. Engineering Research Express, 2(1), 015016. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ab68a3
  3. Mouhine, M., and Hilali, E. (2020), Effect of setback irregularity location on the performance of RC building frames under seismic excitation. Archives of Civil Engineering, 66(4), 399-412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24425/ace.2020.135228
  4. Neeraja, P., and Anish, K. (2022), Investigation on progressive collapse failure in a multistorey irregular structure. Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 538-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.598
  5. Bekele, B. N., and Angelo, W. H. (2022), Effect of Vertical Irregularity on Fundamental Period and Stability of Reinforced Concrete Building, Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 24(2), 147-156. ISSN: 1007-6735. https://doi.org/10.51201/JUSST/22/0172
  6. Massone, L. M., Bedecarratz, E., Rojas, F., and Lafontaine, M. (2021), Nonlinear modeling of a damaged reinforced concrete building and design improvement behavior. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102766
  7. Mwafy, A., Elnashai, A., Sigbjornsson, R., and Salama, A. (2006), Significance of severe distant and moderate close earthquakes on design and behavior of tall buildings, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 15(4), 391-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.300
  8. Verma, B., Baghel, B., Chakradhari, A., Agrawal, A., and Wanjari, P. (2022), Analysis of Wind Load on Tall Building of Various Aspect Ratios, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology(IRJET), 9(1), 595-602. e-ISSN: 2395-0056.
  9. Firdose, H. A., Kumar, A. S., Narayana, G., and Narendra, B. K. (2022), Study on Dynamic Behaviour of Irregular RC Framed Structures with Different Location of Shear Walls. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 982(1), 012076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/ 982/1/012076
  10. Syriac, T. (2021), Comparative Study on the Behaviour of a Multi-Storeyed Building for Regular & Irregular Plan Configuration, 8(5):154-159. ISSN: 2349-6002.
  11. Mohammadzadeh, B., and Kang J. (2021), Seismic analysis of high-rise steel frame building considering irregularities in plan and elevation. Steel and Composite Structures. An International Journal, 39(1), 65-80.
  12. Poudel, A. (2021), A Case Study on Irregularities Present InTall Building and Review of Provisions on Indian Standard. Saudi J Civ Eng. 5(1), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sjce.2021.v05i01.001
  13. Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) (2019), Procedures for design earthquake resistance for building and non-building structures, SNI 1726, Jakarta.
  14. Abdel Raheem, S. E., Ahmed, M. M., Ahmed, M. M., and Abdel-shafy, A. G. (2018), Evaluation of plan configuration irregularity effects on seismic response demands of L-shaped MRF buildings, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,16(9), 3845-3869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0319-7
  15. Mwafy, A., and Khalifa, S. (2017), Effect of vertical structural irregularity on seismic design of tall buildings, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 26(18), 1399. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tal.1399
  16. IS 1893 (Part 1). (2016). Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi.
  17. Hasan, M., Debnath, S., and Akther, A. (2022), Comparative Study of Lateral Loads and Its Cost Effect on RC Moment Frame and Wall-frame Building According to BNBC 2020 in Different Zones of Bangladesh. DaffodilInternational University. 36-42. URL: http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/6941
  18. Mouhine, M., and Hilali, E. (2022), Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with setback irregularity, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(1), 101486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.001
  19. Ahamad, S. A., and Pratap, K. V. (2021), Dynamic analysis of G+ 20 multistoried building by using shear walls in various locations for different seismic zones by using Etabs, Materials Today: Proceedings, 43, 1043-1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.014
  20. Oggu, P., and Gopikrishna, K. (2020), Assessment of three-dimensional RCmoment-resisting frames under repeated earthquakes. In Structures, Elsevier, 26, 6-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.039
  21. Nazri, F. M., Tan, C. G., and Saruddin, S. N. A. (2018), Fragility curves of regular and irregular moment-resisting concrete and steel frames, International Journal of Civil Engineering. 16(8), 917-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0237-0
  22. Nair, K. G., and Akshara, S. P. (2017), Seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings-a review, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 4(2), 165-169. e-ISSN: 2395-0056.
  23. Habib, M. Z., Alam, M. A., Barua, S., and Islam, M. (2016), Effect of plan irregularity on RC buildings due to BNBC-2006 Earthquake load, IJSER. 7(1), 761-765. ISSN:2229-5518.
  24. Mazza, F. (2014), Modelling and nonlinear static analysis of reinforced concrete framed buildings irregular in plan, Engineering Structures, 80, 98-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.026
  25. Wakchaure, M. R. and Ped, S. P. (2012), Earthquake analysis of high rise building with and without infilled walls, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology(IJEIT), 2(2), 89-94.
  26. Chaudhary, K. P., and Mahajan, A. (2021), Response spectrum analysis of irregular-shaped high-rise buildings under combined effect of plan and vertical irregularity using csi etabs. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 889, No. 1, p. 012055). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/889/1/012055
  27. Sazzad, M. M., and Azad, M. S. (2015), Effect of building shape on the response to wind and earthquake, International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering, ISSN, 2319-5347.
  28. Mahato, O. P., and Kumar, M. A. (2019), Study on Effect of Geometry on RC Multistory Building Under Seismic Load, In International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering (ICACE-2019) (Vol. 21, p. 23).
  29. Choi, K. S., Lee, H. C., and Kim, H. J. (2016). Influence of analytical models on the seismic response of modular structures. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20(2), 74-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.2.074
  30. Seo, D. W., Kim, H. J., and Shin, S. W. (2010). An Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Resisting Capacity of RC Structure Using Static and Dynamic Analysis. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 14(6), 238-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2010.14.6.238
  31. Islam, M. R., Chakraborty, S., and Kim, D. (2022). Effect of Plan Irregularity and Beam Discontinuity on Structural Performances of Buildings under Lateral Loadings, ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 24(2), 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5659/AIKAR.2022.24.2.53
  32. ACI Standard (2011, August). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-11). In American Concrete Institute.