DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability and Validity of Korean-Version of Information Needs in Cardiac Rehabilitation Scale

  • Choi, Sang Young Heon (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Joong Hwi (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedi, Daegu Catholic University)
  • Received : 2022.09.23
  • Accepted : 2022.10.06
  • Published : 2022.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: The Cardiac Rehabilitation scale (INCR scale) is a verified measure worldwide. The scale measures the extent to which cardiac rehabilitation meets the various needs of the participating patients and determines how education related to heart disease and rehabilitation satisfies their preferences. The current study applied the INCR scale to verify and develop it for use in Korea by conforming to Korean culture and language. Methods: The Korean version of the INCR scale was created after a six-step process in accordance with the international questionnaire translation law. The Korean version of the INCR scale was assessed in 45 cardiac rehabilitation patients (29 males, 16 females). Internal consistency was verified using Cronbach's alpha. Test-re-test reliability and interrater reliability were verified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Content validity was selected to verify the validity. Results: The content validity index of the Korean version of the INCR scale was high, with an average of 0.93. Cronbach's Alpha for Internal consistency also revealed high reliability of 0.89 in all 10 categories. The interclass correlation coefficient of the test-re-test and interrater reliability scores were 0.95 and 0.81, respectively. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the Korean version of the INCR scale would be instrumental in the clinical setting to determine the knowledge, educational needs, and preferences of patients participating in cardiovascular disease and cardiac rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee HH, Cho SMJ, Lee HK et al. Korea heart disease fact sheet 2020: analysis of nationwide data. Korean Circ J. 2021;51(6):495-503. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0097
  2. Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR et al. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005; 43(6):521-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000163641.86870.af
  3. Stirrat C, Mann S. Perceptions of cardiovascular risk factors among cardiology outpatients. Heart Lung Circ. 2008;17S:S22-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2008.03.051
  4. Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B et al. Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(9):659-72. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-143-9-200511010-00010
  5. Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the national heart, lung, and blood institute. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;113(19):2363-72.
  6. Bartels MN, Whiteson JH, Alba AS et al. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and cancer rehabilitation. 1. cardiac rehabilitation review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(3):46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.027
  7. Yamada S, Shimizu Y, Suzuki M et al. Functional limitations predict the risk of rehospitalization among patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J. 2012;76:1654-61. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1178
  8. Ades PA, Pashkow FJ, Nestor JR. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1997;17(4):222-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-199707000-00002
  9. Kim C. Overview of cardiac rehabilitation. J Korean Med Assoc. 2016;59(12):938-46. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2016.59.12.938
  10. Song Y. Analyses of studies on cardiac rehabilitation for patients with cardiovascular disease in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009;39(3):311-20. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.311
  11. Brown JP, Clark AM, Dalal H et al. Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD008895.
  12. Fredericks S, Guruge S, Sidani S et al. Postoperative patient education: a systematic review. Clin Nurs Res. 2010;19(2):144-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773810365994
  13. de Melo Ghisi, Gabriela Lima, Grace SL et al. Development and psychometric validation of a scale to assess information needs in cardiac rehabilitation: the INCR tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(3):337-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.007
  14. de Melo Ghisi, Gabriela Lima, Dos Santos RZ et al. Validation of a portuguese version of the information needs in cardiac rehabilitation (INCR) scale in brazil. Heart Lung. 2014;43(3):192-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.01.009
  15. Choi S, Lee S. Validity and reliability of the korean version of the job embeddedness for Korean nurses. J Korean Data Anal Soc. 2017;19(4):2145-57. https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2017.19.4.2145
  16. Kim SY, Hong MH. A study on developing minimum requirement guidelines for standard questionnaire translation, validation using delphi method. KJFM. 2000;21(4):457-70.
  17. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory 3E. New York, Tata McGraw-hill education, 1994:23-721.