복식문화연구 (The Research Journal of the Costume Culture)

  • 제30권5호
  • /
  • Pages.717-731
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-0401(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-6334(eISSN)
복식문화학회 (The Costume Culture Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

패션디자인 CAD의 온라인 교육 방법 연구 - 포토샵, 일러스트레이터, 텍스프로 프로그램을 중심으로 -

Online pedagogical strategies of a fashion design CAD course - Focused on Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, and Texpro programs -

  • 투고 : 2022.09.24
  • 심사 : 2022.10.14
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to suggest effective online pedagogical strategies for a fashion design CAD course to enhance student learning and satisfaction. The study investigated student experience of online learning and compared online learning with a face-to-face learning experience. Student concentration, participation, perceptions of effectiveness of teaching, utilization of learning materials, and satisfaction were analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale. Advantages and disadvantages of online learning as well as advantages of face-to-face learning were also analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Student concentration, participation, and perception of effectiveness of teaching were greater for face-to-face learning with significantly higher concentration on individual practice. Students utilized video recording of synchronous online lectures more actively than PDF lecture notes. The advantages of face-to-face learning were plentiful communication and feedback and easy questioning process as well as high levels of understanding and concentration. Meanwhile, major disadvantages of online learning were the speed of the lecture, lower levels of understanding and concentration, limited peer interaction, and technical problems. Major advantages of online learning were flexibility and convenience, repetitive learning through videos, and instant communication and feedback. Students preferred a blended learning approach for the fashion design CAD course. For effective online learning, it is suggested that instructors frequently question and check student practice through screen share in a private online meeting room and engage activities that are demanding of student interaction. The video recording of synchronous online lectures is also suggested as a supplemental learning material for repetitive learning.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, S.-H. (2003). A study on the possibility of applying blended learning to design education -Focused on the survey of learners' satisfaction-. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 16(4), 443-452.
  2. Bender, D., & Vredevoogd, J. (2006). Using online education technologies to support studio instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 114-122.
  3. Bender, D. M., Wood, B. J., & Vredevoogd, J. D. (2004). Teaching time: Distance education versus classroom instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 103-114. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1802_4
  4. Boorady, L. M., Hawley, J. M., & Schofield, N. A. (2011). Using animated graphics as a teaching tool in patternmaking: A comparison of methods. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 7(4), 11-23. doi:10.4018/jicte.2011100102
  5. Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R. (2003). Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. Proceeding of Apple University Consortium Academic and Developers Conference, 9-21.
  6. Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M.-H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 473-491. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9265-0
  7. Coyne, R. D., Lee, J., & Denitsa, P. (2017). Re-visiting the flipped classroom in a design context. Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v10i2.281
  8. Dreamson, N. (2017). Online collaboration in design education: An experiment in real-time manipulation of prototypes and communication. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), 188-199. doi:10.1111/jade.12079
  9. Fleischmann, K. (2019). From studio practice to online design education: Can we teach design online? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 45(1), 1-19. doi:10.21432/cjlt27849
  10. Fleischmann, K. (2020a). Online design education: Searching for a middle ground. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19(1), 36-57. doi:10.1177/1474022218758231
  11. Fleischmann, K. (2020b). The online pandemic in design courses: Design higher education in digital isolation. In L. Naumovska (Ed.), The impact of COVID-19 on the international education system (pp. 1-16). London, United Kingdom: Proud Pen. doi:10.51432/978-1-8381524-0-6_1
  12. Fleischmann, K. (2021). Hands-on versus virtual: Reshaping the design classroom with blended learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(1), 87-112. doi:10.1177/1474022220906393
  13. Hwang, J. H., & Lim, H. (2021). A case study of spatial CAD education in blended learning environment. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 21(10), 115-126. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.10.115
  14. Kim, L.-Y., & Park, M. (2005). A study on the distance learning education for fashion illustration. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 55(3), 150-163.
  15. K-MOOC users increased by 30% due to COVID-19, the Ministry of Education invests 25 billion and 8 million won in it. (2022, January 26). Newsis. Retrieved September 23, 2022, from https://newsis.com/view/?id=NISX20220126_0001738139
  16. Kwon, Y. J., & Rhew, S. (2018). Teaching a fashion design studio course in distance education: A case study. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 68(5), 107-127. doi:10.7233/jksc.2018.68.5.107
  17. Lee, J., & Lee, M. (2020). Students' online fashion studio class experience and factors affecting their class satisfaction. Journal of Fashion Business, 24(6), 135-147. doi:10.12940/jfb.2020.24.6.135
  18. Lim, H.-J., & Park, H.-W. (2005). Avatar application for fashion cyber education. Journal of Fashion Business, 9(4), 1-15.
  19. Park, J. Y. (2011). Design education online: Learning delivery and evaluation. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 176-187. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01689.x
  20. Park, S. J. (2021). 코로나 이후 미래교육 [Future education after COVID-19] (2nd ed.). Seoul: Kyoyookkwahaksa.
  21. Pektas, S. T., & Gurel, M. O. (2014). Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students' experiences within the disciplinary differences framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 31-44. doi:10.14742/ajet.372
  22. Schenker, J. (2020). The future after COVID: Futurist expectations for changes, challenges, and opportunities after the COVID-19 pandemic (S. H. Park, Trans.). Seoul: Mediasup. (Original work published 2020)
  23. Seol, H. J. (2022). A case study on the application of flipped learning to nail beauty class -Focusing on the analysis of learner perception-. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 30(4), 594-607. doi:10.29049/rjcc.2022.30.4.594
  24. Shreeve, A. (2011). The way we were? Signature pedagogies under threat. Proceeding of the 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers, 112-125.
  25. Yick, K. L., Yip, J., Au, S. C., Lai, Y. Y., & Yu, A. (2018). Effectiveness of blended learning in the first year of fashion education. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(2), 178-188. doi:10.1080/17543266.2018.1546910
  26. Zain, M. Z. M., Zain, R. M., Hassan, H., Amri, N. H. Z., Drahman, M. H., Hasbullah, S. W., & Ramli, A. (2021). Distance education: The challenges and effects of the COVID-19 pandemic among fashion students in Malaysia. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(6), 110-125.