DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Extragastric Metastasis of Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Lymphovascular Invasion and Negative Resected Margins

  • Lee, Han Myung (Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwak, Yoonjin (Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Hyunsoo (Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sang Gyun (Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Soo-Jeong (Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2022.05.19
  • Accepted : 2022.08.16
  • Published : 2022.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: Lymphovascular invasion is a criterion for non-curative resection in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). We aimed to determine the rate of extragastric metastasis (EGM) and identify the predictors of EGM in patients with negative resection margins (R0 resection) and lymphovascular invasion in post-ESD pathology. Materials and Methods: A total of 2,983 patients underwent ESD for EGC. Among them, 110 had a pathology of R0 resection and positive lymphovascular invasion. Patients underwent additional gastrectomy (n=63) or further follow-up without gastrectomy (n=47). Results: The 110 patients were assigned to one of the 3 groups according to ESD indications based on post-ESD pathology. The first group satisfied the absolute indication for ESD (n=18), the second group satisfied the expanded indications for ESD (n=34), and the last group satisfied the beyond indication (n=58). The number of occurrences of EGM in each group was 1 (5.6%), 3 (8.8%), and 3 (5.2%), respectively. The logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, and indication for ESD, showed that larger tumor size was associated with EGM (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.10; P=0.048). In contrast, ESD indication criteria did not affect EGM (P=0.349). Conclusions: Tumor size was the only predictive indicator for EGM in patients who underwent R0 resection and lymphovascular invasion on post-ESD pathology. Even patients with pathology corresponding to the absolute indication criteria of ESD had lymphovascular invasion, which means that they require additional gastrectomy due to the risk of EGM.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (#NRF-2019R1A2C1009923, #NRF-2022R1A2B5B01001430) and the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research Foundation (KCHUGR - 202002001).

References

  1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer 2021;24:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y
  2. Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Min YW, et al. Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. Clin Endosc 2020;53:142-166. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.032
  3. Group DW, Panel R; Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel. Association GCotKGC. Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer 2019;19:1-48. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8
  4. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1223-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3800-7
  5. Oda I, Oyama T, Abe S, Ohnita K, Kosaka T, Hirasawa K, et al. Preliminary results of multicenter questionnaire study on long-term outcomes of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 2014;26:214-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12141
  6. Eom BW, Kim YI, Kim KH, Yoon HM, Cho SJ, Lee JY, et al. Survival benefit of additional surgery after noncurative endoscopic resection in patients with early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:155-163.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.036
  7. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 2000;3:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011720
  8. Ichikawa D, Kubota T, Kikuchi S, Fujiwara H, Konishi H, Tsujiura M, et al. Prognostic impact of lymphatic invasion in patients with node-negative gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:111-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21311
  9. Liu C, Zhang R, Lu Y, Li H, Lu P, Yao F, et al. Prognostic role of lymphatic vessel invasion in early gastric cancer: a retrospective study of 188 cases. Surg Oncol 2010;19:4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2008.10.003
  10. Pyo JH, Lee H, Min YW, Min BH, Lee JH, Kim KM, et al. Feasibility of endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer with lymphovascular invasion. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:449-455. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07119-4
  11. Kim SG, Lyu DH, Park CM, Lee NR, Kim J, Cha Y, et al. Current status of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in Korea: role and benefits. Korean J Intern Med 2019;34:785-793. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2017.374
  12. Glasheen WP, Cordier T, Gumpina R, Haugh G, Davis J, Renda A. Charlson comorbidity index: ICD-9 update and ICD-10 translation. Am Health Drug Benefits 2019;12:188-197.
  13. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Cho SJ, Lee JY, Kim CG, et al. Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:603-608. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0283-6
  14. Choi YY, An JY, Guner A, Kang DR, Cho I, Kwon IG, et al. Skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: is it skipping or skipped? Gastric Cancer 2016;19:206-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0472-5
  15. Kim DH, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S. Clinical significance of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients [EJSO]. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.009
  16. Toya Y, Endo M, Nakamura S, Akasaka R, Kosaka T, Yanai S, et al. Clinical outcomes of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection with negative resected margins for gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:1218-1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.018
  17. Ha MH, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S. Prognostic significance of suprapancreatic lymph nodes and its implication on D2 dissection. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e11092. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011092
  18. Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Kobayashi O, Sairenji M, Motohashi H, Noguchi Y. Is D2 lymph node dissection necessary for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:401-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573876
  19. Degiuli M, De Manzoni G, Di Leo A, D'Ugo D, Galasso E, Marrelli D, et al. Gastric cancer: current status of lymph node dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:2875-2893. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2875
  20. Wu CW, Lo SS, Shen KH, Hsieh MC, Chen JH, Chiang JH, et al. Incidence and factors associated with recurrence patterns after intended curative surgery for gastric cancer. World J Surg 2003;27:153-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6279-7
  21. Lai JF, Kim S, Kim K, Li C, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, et al. Prediction of recurrence of early gastric cancer after curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1896-1902. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0473-x