DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Decisions of Selection Factors in the Fishing Village New-deal 300 Project Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

계층의사분석 기법을 적용한 어촌뉴딜 300사업의 선정 결정요인 연구

  • Kim, Dong Min (Korea Fisheries Infrastructure Public Agency) ;
  • Kim, Gunwoo (Department of Ocean Civil Engineering, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 김동민 (한국어촌어항공단) ;
  • 김건우 (목포해양대학교 해양건설공학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.19
  • Accepted : 2022.08.29
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

The fishing village new-deal 300 project covers 300 fishing villages and ports for integrated development including reforming backward facilities and utilizing regionally indigenous resources for specialized programs. An analysis was conducted to decide selection factors in the fishing village new-deal 300 project through the expert interview based on AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). The results of high-class appraisal items showed that the weights were ranked in the order of the development conditions and basic plan, project effects, project plan, and project execution and management. The project effect obtained 15.57 point in the AHP analysis, whereas the guideline stipulated the point as 6 point for the project effect item, The derived weights for each appraisal item in this study will hereafter be referred in determining the assessment points for the fishing village and port development projects.

어촌뉴딜 300사업은 300개의 어촌과 어항을 대상으로 하는 복합개발사업으로 낙후된 시설 개선 및 지역특화 자원활용 등 전문프로그램을 제공하는 사업이다. 본 연구에서는 어촌뉴딜 300사업의 선정평가 항목 별 가중치 결정을 위해 다기준 평가방법인 AHP로 전문가 설문조사를 통한 분석을 수행하였다. 평가결과, 상위계층 평가항목은 개발여건 및 기본구상, 사업효과, 사업계획, 사업 시행 및 관리순으로 중요도가 높게 나타났다. 사업효과 항목은 가이드라인에서 6점으로 낮은 배점이었지만, AHP 결과 15.57점의 배점이 도출되었다. 본 연구에서 도출된 항목별 가중치는 향후 어촌어항 개발사업 평가항목 배점 선정에 참조할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chae, G. -Y. and C. Y. Lee(2020), Competitiveness Evaluation Factors and Strategic Development for the port of Busan using the SWOT.AHP Method, Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 105-128. https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2020.03.36.1.105
  2. Choi, M. -C.(2020), Evaluation of Analytic Hierarchy Process Method and Development of a Weight Modified Method, Management & Information System Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 145-162.
  3. Hur, J.(2003), Economic Impact of the Fishing Port Development Projects, Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 45-62.
  4. Kim, G. S.(2007), Analyzing Effects on Improving Infrastructures for the Development of Maritime Tourism Combined Fishing Ports, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 146-157.
  5. Kim, S. G. and Y. T. Chang(1996), A Study on the Comprehensive Development Plan of the Fishing Village, Ocean Policy Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 277-303.
  6. Kim, Y. -P., C. -I. Ryu, H. -S. Yoon and H. T. Kim(2007), Estimating the Development Potential of Urban Fishing Ports in the Region of Busan, Korea, Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 355-365.
  7. KMI(Korea Maritime Institute)(2015), A Study on Standard Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study on Fishing Port Project.
  8. KMI(Korea Maritime Institute)(2017), A Study on Policy Direction for the Development of the Fisheries Industry and Fishing Communities of the Future.
  9. Lee, H. S.(2006), An Analysis on Priority Determining Criteria among Integrated Development Projects in Rural Villages Using AHP, Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 183-197.
  10. Lee, K. -N., J. -H. Jung, and J. W. Choi(2011), A Study on Decisions on Investment Factors in the Development of Local Fishing Harbors, Ocean and Polar Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 473-483. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2011.33.4.473
  11. Ssaaty, T. L.(1980), The analytic hierarchy process, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  12. Statistical Office(2021), https://kostat.go.kr
  13. Yang, C. H., G. T. Yeo, H. J. Jung, H. K. Kim, and Y. L. Son(2011), Analysis on Non-Market Benefit of Port Re-Modeling Factor Using AHP, Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 57-62. https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2011.23.1.057