한국환경과학회지 (Journal of Environmental Science International)

  • 제31권10호
  • /
  • Pages.845-859
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-4517(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3503(eISSN)
한국환경과학회 (The Korean Environmental Sciences Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자연환경의 종합적 평가시스템 적용범위에 대한 연구

A Study on the Application of a Comprehensive Evaluation System of the Natural Environment

  • 윤호정 (국립한경대학교 응용자원환경학과 응용자원환경학전공) ;
  • 염성진 (국립한경대학교 식물자원조경학부 조경학과)
  • Yoon, Ho-Jung (Dept of Applied Resource and Environment, Faculty of Applied Resource and Environment, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yeom, Sung-Jin (Dept of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Plant Resources Landscape, Hankyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.18
  • 심사 : 2022.10.04
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The natural environment of the modern society does not simply reflect damage, but is a complex and grave reality that threatens the Earth. To solve this problem, various aspects related to the natural environment have been explored around the world, and a number of studies are ongoing to balance the development and preservation of the natural environment in Korea. However, no clear category exists for the natural environment and the related terms are ambiguous, rendering the overall evaluation system is in efficient. Therefore, the present study attempted to set the scope of application of a comprehensive evaluation system based on terms similar to the natural environment, concepts of the natural environment viewed from a value-based perspective and a capacitive perspective. In addition, by examining the concept of ecosystem services, a conceptual model for efficient application of the evaluation system of the natural environment through the association between categories of the natural environment is presented to derive implications for practical operation in the future.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 한경대학교 2021년도 학술연구조성비의 지원에 의한 것임

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S. E., 2013, Definition and classification of ecosystem services for decision making, Journal of Environmental Policy, 12(2), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.17330/joep.12.2.201306.3
  2. Albon, S., Turner, K., Watson, R., 2014, UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on: Synthesis of the Key Findings, United Nations Environment Programme, UK.
  3. Arias-Arevalo, P., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Martin-Lopez, B., Perez-Rincon, M., 2018, Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: a taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods, Environmental Values, 27(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327118X15144698637513
  4. Aspinall, R., Austen, M., Bardgett, R., Bateman, I., Berry, P., Bird, W., Bradbury, R., Brown, C., Bullock, J., Burgess, J., Church, A., Christie, S., Crute, I., Davies, L., Fitter, A., Gibson, C., Hails, R., Haines-Young, R., Heathwaite, L., Hopkins, J., Jenkins, M., Jones, L., Mace, G., Malcolm, S., Maltby, E., Maskell, L., Norris, K., Ormerod, S., Osborne, J., Pretty, J., Quine, C., Russell, S., Simpson, L., Smith, P., Tierney, M., Turner, K., Wal, R., Vira, B., Walpole, M., Watkinson, A., Weighell, T., Winn, J., Winter, M., 2011, UK National Ecosystem Assessment, Technical Report, Oxford University Press, UK.
  5. Ban, Y. U., 2007, Development of environmental justice indicators, Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association, 20(3), 3-23.
  6. Bishop, A. B., 1974, Carrying capacity in regional environmental management, US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., USA.
  7. Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological economics, 63(2-3), 616-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
  8. Burkhard, B., de Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jorgensen, S. E., Potschin, M., 2012, Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services, Ecological indicators, 21, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008
  9. Chan, K. M., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Diaz, S., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martin-Lopez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, Y., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N., 2016, Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 113(6), 1462-1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113
  10. Cho, D, H., Bae, M. K., Um, H. S., 2004, Evaluation of the importance of environmental indicators for determining environmental policy priorities, Korean Public Administration Review, 16, 713-734.
  11. Costanza, R., 2020, Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability, Ecosystem Services, 43, 101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101096
  12. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., Belt, M., 1997, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387(6630), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  13. Dally, G. C., Power, M., 1997, Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, Nature, 388, 529.
  14. De Groot, R. S., 1992, Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, 1st ed., Wolters-Noordhoff B.V., Netherlands.
  15. De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., Boumans, R. M., 2002, A Typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecological economics, 41(3), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  16. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2007, An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, London, UK.
  17. Diaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Baldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio., Chan, K. MA., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., Koetz, T., Leadley, P., Lyver, P., Mace, G. M., Martin-Lopez, B., Okumura, M., Pacheco, D., Pascual, U., Perez, E. S., Reyers, B., Roth, E., Saito, O., Scholes, R. J., Sharma, N., Tallis, H., Thaman, R., Watson, R., Yahara, T., Hamid, Z. A., Akosim, C., Al-Hafedh, Y., Allahverdiyev, R., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., Asfaw, Z., Bartus, G., Brooks, L. A., Caillaux, J., Dalle, G., Darnaedi, D., Driver, A., Erpul, G., EscobarEyzaguirre, P., Failler, P., Fouda, A. M. M. F., Fu, B., Gundimeda, H., Hashimoto, S., Homer, F., Lavorel, S., Lichtenstein, G., Mala, W. A., Mandivenyi, W., Matczak, P., Mbizvo, C., Mehrdadi, M., Metzger, J. P., Mikissa, J. B., Moller, H., Mooney, H. A., Mumby, P., Nagendra, H., Nesshover, C., Oteng-Yeboah, A. A., Pataki, G., Roue, M., Rubis, J., Schultz, M., Smith, P., Sumaila, R., Takeuchi, K., Thomas,, S., Verma, M., Yeo-Chang, Y., Zlatanova, D., 2015, The IPBES Conceptual Framework-connecting nature and people, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
  18. Dong, Y., Miraglia, S., Manzo, S., Georgiadis, S., Sorup, H. J. D., Boriani, E., Hald, T., Thons, S., Hauschild, M. Z., 2018, Environmental sustainable decision making: the need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis, Environmental Science & Policy, 87, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.018
  19. Emerton, L., 2016, Economic valuation of wetlands: total economic value, The wetland book, Springer, Dordrecht, 1-6.
  20. Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., 2008, Ecosystem services: classification for valuation, Biological conservation, 141(5), 1167-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019
  21. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2009, Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services, Centre for Environmental Management, Nottingham, UK.
  22. Harrison, P. A., Dunford, R., Barton, D. N., Kelemen, E., Martin-Lopez, B., Norton, L., Termansen, M., Saarikoski, H., Hendriks, K., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Czucz, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Howard, D., Jacobs, S., Karlsen, M., Kopperoinen, L., Madsen, A., Rusch, G., Eupen, M., Verweij, P., Smith, R., Tuomasjukka, D., Zulian, G., 2018, Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach, Ecosystem Services, 29, 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
  23. Hartzog, P. B., 2010, P2P Foundation, https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/understanding-carrying-capacity/2010/07/01.
  24. Hjerp, P., Brink, P., Medarova-Bergstrom, K., Mazza, L., Kettunen, M., McGuinn, J., Banf, P., Hernandez, G., 2013, The guide to multi-benefit cohesion policy investments in nature and green infrastructure, European Union, Louxembourg, Europe.
  25. Hwang, K. Y., Hwang, I. S., Lee, S. K., Jo, S. W., Oh, K. J., 2006, Environmental Capacity Assessment of Busan City, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 15(1), 79-92.
  26. Kerekes, S., Marjaine Szerenyi, Z., Kocsis, T., 2018, Sustainability, environmental economics, welfare, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary, Europe.
  27. Kim, E. Y., Kim, J. Y., Jung, H. J., Song, W. K., 2017, Development and feasibility of indicators for ecosystem service evaluation of urban park, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 26(4), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2017.26.4.227
  28. Kim, I. K., Kim, S. H., Kwon, H. S., 2018, A Study on spatial distribution and correlations of regional ecosystem services: a case study of Gunsan, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 53, 691-705.
  29. Kim, J. H., 2016, Development of indicators for green economic evaluation, Business report 2016, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong-si, Korea.
  30. Kumar, P., 2012, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, 1st ed., Routledge, UK, 1-456.
  31. Lee, H. W., Hong, H. J., 2017, Understanding and policy direction of total natural resources management, KEI Focus 28, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong-si, Korea.
  32. Lee, H. W., Kim, C. K., Hong, H. J., 2016, Development of natural capital sustainability index based on ecosystem services (I), Basic research report 2016, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong-si, Korea.
  33. Lee, S. J., 2017, Challenges for the introduction of various approaches to environmental value assessment. Environmental Forum 213, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong-si, Korea.
  34. Lee, S. J., 2020, Assessment and application of carrying capacity for the sustainability policy, Policy report 2020-01, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong-si, Korea.
  35. Lee, W. G., Lee, J, S., Jeon, S. W., 2006, A Development of environmental capacity estimation model using the national environmental assessment indicators, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 15(6), 385-394.
  36. Lim, M. T., Kwon, C. Y., 2010, A Study on the development of sustainable environmental evaluation index, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 21(6), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2010.21.6.099
  37. Ministry of Environment, 2003, A Study on the development of the national land environmental capacity calculation model and the establishment of national land environmental indicators, Sejong-si, Korea.
  38. Muller, F., Fohrer, N., Chicharo, L., 2015, The basic ideas of the ecosystem service concept, Ecosystem Services and River Basin Ecohydrology, Springer, Dordrecht, 7-33.
  39. Myeong, S. J., 2017, Green space accessibility analysis in terms of environmental justice, Occasional research report 15, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong-si, Korea.
  40. Nich Institute, 2018, Duke Nicholas Institute for environ mental policy solutions, https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/.
  41. Park, S. A., Lee, Y. M., 2018, A critical review of the environmental performance index system, Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 25-28.
  42. Plottu, E., Plottu, B., 2007, The concept of Total Economic Value of environment: A reconsideration within a hierarchical rationality, Ecological economics, 61(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027
  43. Rossi, A., Vellutini, E., Alessi, E. M., Schettino, G., Ruch, V., Perez, J. D., 2022. Environmental index for fragmentation impact and environment evolution analysis, Journal of Space Safety Engineering.
  44. Sara, G.,, Mazzola, A., 2004, The carrying capacity for Mediterranean bivalve suspension feeders: evidence from analysis of food availability and hydrodynamics and their integration into a local model, Ecological Modelling, 179(3), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.005
  45. Schellens, M. K., Gisladottir, J., 2018, Critical natural resources: Challenging the current discourse and proposal for a holistic definition, Resources, 7(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7040079
  46. Schneider, D. M., Godschalk, D. R., Axler, N., 1978, The carrying capacity concept as a planning tool, No. 338, American Society of Planning Officials, Chicago, USA.
  47. Schroeder, H. W., 2011, Environmental values and their relationship to ecological services, In: Mittleman, D.; Middleton, DA, eds. Make no little plans, Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference of Environmental Design Research Association. Chicago, 212-217.
  48. Shin, Y. C., Min, D. K., 2005, Estimation of Economic Value of Ecological Nature Level 1, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 14, 25-50.
  49. Spangenberg, J. H., Gorg, C., Truong, D. T., Tekken, V., Bustamante, J. V., Settele, J., 2014, Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions: Four case studies, Ecosystem Services & Management, 10(1), 40-53.
  50. Spangenberg, J. H., Haaren, C. V., Settele, J., 2014, The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy, Ecological Economics, 104, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025
  51. Stalhammar, S., Thoren, H., 2019, Three perspectives on relational values of nature, Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1201-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4
  52. Stebbings, E., Hooper, T., Austen, M. C., Papathanasopoulou, E., Yan, X., 2021, Accounting for benefits from natural capital: Applying a novel composite indicator framework to the marine environment, Ecosystem Services, 50, 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101308
  53. Stockholm Resilience Center Research, 2017, Stockholm Resilience Centre, https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2017-02-28-contributions-to-agenda-2030.html.
  54. Sukhdev, P., Wittmer, H., Miller. D., 2008, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity challenges and response, 1st ed., Oxford University Press, U.K., 1-15.
  55. Tadaki, M., Sinner, J., Chan, K. M., 2017, Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts, Ecology and Society, 22(1), 7.
  56. United Nations Environment Programme, 2010, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations, 1st ed., Kumar, P. Routledge, New York, USA.
  57. Van, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Espinosa, M., Gomez, S., Viaggi, D., 2014, European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review Agron, Sustainable Dev., 34(2), 309-325.
  58. Vogt, W., 1949, Road to survival, 1st ed., Kessinger Publishing, USA, 75.
  59. Winograd, M., Farrow, A., 2007, Sustainable development indicators for decision making: concepts, methods, definition and use, Dimensions of sustainable development, 1, 41-73.
  60. Yoon, H. J., Yeom, S. J., 2021, A Study on environmental policy integration for the efficient use and conservation of natural environmental values, Journal of Environmental Science International, 30(8), 629-646. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2021.30.8.629
  61. Zhang, C., Li, J., Zhou, Z., 2022, Ecosystem service cascade: Concept, review, application and prospect, Ecological Indicators, 137, 108766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108766
  62. 2005, IUCN, https://www.iucn.org/commissions/commiss ion-ecosystem-management/our-work/cems-thematic-groups/ecosystem-services.
  63. 2005, UNEP, https://www.unep.org/.
  64. 2022, Legal Information Center, https://www.law.go.kr/.