Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical investigation on seismic behaviors of midrise special moment resistant frame retrofitted by timber-base bracings

  • Received : 2022.05.09
  • Accepted : 2022.10.17
  • Published : 2022.10.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Timber is one of the few natural, renewable building materials and glulam is a type of engineering wood product. In the present work, timber-based braces are applied for retrofitting midrise Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) using two types of timber base braces (Timber base glulam, and hybrid Timber-Steel-BRB) as alternatives for retrofitting by traditional steel bracings. The improving effects of adding the bracings to the SMRF on seismic characteristics of the frame are evaluated using load-bearing capacity, energy dissipation, and story drifts of the frame. For evaluating the retrofitting effects on the seismic performance of SMRF, a five-story SMRF is considered unretofitted and retrofitted with steel-hollow structural section (HSS) brace, Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam) brace, and hybrid Timber-Steel BRB. Using OpenSees structural analyzer, the performance are investigated under pushover, cyclic, and incremental loading. Results showed that steel-HSS, timber base Glulam, and hybrid timber-steel BRB braces have more significant roles in energy dissipation, increasing stiffness, changing capacity curves, reducing inter-story drifts, and reducing the weight of the frames, compared by steel bracing. Results showed that Hybrid BRB counteract the negative post-yield stiffness, so their use is more beneficial on buildings where P-Delta effects are more critical. It is found that the repair costs of the buildings with hybrid BRB will be less due to lower residual drifts. As a result, timber steel-BRB has the best energy dissipation and seismic performance due to symmetrical and stable hysteresis curves of buckling restrained braces that can experience the same capacities in tension and compression.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC (2005a), "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings", Amer. Institute Steel Construct., Inc, Chicago, IL.
  2. Aloisio, A., Alaggio, R., Kohler, J. and Fragiacomo, M. (2020), "Extension of generalized Bouc-Wen hysteresis modeling of wood joints and structural systems", J. Eng. Mech., 146(3), 04020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001722.
  3. Aloisio, A., Boggian, F. and Tomasi, R. (2022b), "Design of a novel seismic retrofitting system for RC structures based on asymmetric friction connections and CLT panels", Eng. Struct., 254, 113807, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113807.
  4. Aloisio, A., Pelliciari, M., Sirotti, S., Boggian, F. and Tomasi, R. (2022a), "Optimization of the structural coupling between RC frames, CLT shear walls and asymmetric friction connections", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 20, 3775-3800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01337-8.
  5. ANSI/AISC 341-05 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings.
  6. Antonio, D.C., Felice, C.P., Nicla, L. and Domenico, N. (2019), "Modelling of post-tensioned timber framed buildings with hysteretic bracing system preliminary analysis", IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science., 233(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/233/2/022026.
  7. Applied Technology Council (ATC-24) (1992), Guidelines for Cyclic Testing of Components of Steel Structures, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  8. ASCE (2006), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-05) Including Supplement No.2, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  9. Atlayan, O. and Charney, F.A. (2014), "Hybrid buckling-restrained braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 96, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.001.
  10. Blomgren, H.E., Koppitz, J.P., Valdes, A.D. and Ko, E. (2016), "Heavy Timber Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame as solution for commercial buildings", World Conference on Timber Engineering. Vienna, Austria.
  11. Dong, H., He, M., Wang, X., Christopoulos, C., Li, Z. and Shu, Z. (2021), "Development of a uniaxial hysteretic model for doweltype timber joints in OpenSees", Constr. Build. Mater., 288, 123112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123112.
  12. FEMA-350 (2001), Seismic Design Criteria for New Moment-Resisting Steel Frame Construction, Federal Emergency Management Agency Report.
  13. FEMA-356 (2000) Pre-Standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  14. Foliente, G.C. (1993), Hysteresis Modeling of Wood Joints and Structural Systems, Master's Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, America.
  15. Ganjavi, B., Hadinejad, A. and Jafarieh, A.H. (2019), "Evaluation of ground motion scaling methods on drift demands of energybased plastic designed steel frames under near-fault pulse-type earthquakes", Steel Compos. Struct., 32(1), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.32.1.091.
  16. Gilbert, C. and Erochko, J. (2016), "Adaptation of advanced high R-factor bracing systems into heavy timber frames", World Conference of Timber Engineering., Vienna, Austria.
  17. Gilbert, C., Gohlich, R. and Erochko, J. (2015), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of innovative high R-factor hybrid timbersteel buildings", 11th Canadian Conference of Engineering., Victoria, Canada.
  18. GUNES, N. (2020), "Comparison of monotonic and cyclic pushover analyses for the near-collapse point on a mid-rise reinforced concrete framed building", Earthq. Struct., 19(3), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.3.189.
  19. Habibi, A., Saffari, H. and Izadpanah, M. (2019), "Optimal lateral load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 32(1), 67-77 https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.32.1.067.
  20. Hsiao, P.C., Lehman, D.E. and Roeder, C.W. (2012), "Improved analytical model for special concentrically braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 73, 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.01.010.
  21. Ikeda, K. and Mahin, S.A. (1986), "Cyclic response of steel braces", J. Struct. Eng., 112(2), 342-361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(342).
  22. Jiun-Wei, L. and Stephen, S.A. (2013), Experimental and Analytical Studies on the Seismic Behavior of Conventional and Hybrid Braced Frames", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California.
  23. Jouneghani, H.G. and Haghollahi, A. (2020), "Experimental study on hysteretic behavior of steel moment frame equipped with elliptical brace", Steel Compos. Struct., 34(6), 891-907. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.891.
  24. Kaley, P. and Aamir Baig, M. (2017), "Pushover Analysis of Steel Framed Building", Civ. Eng. Environ. Tech., 4 (3), 301-306. http://www.krishisanskriti.org/Publication.html.
  25. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath .S.K. (2006), "Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings", Earthq Spectra, 22(2), 367-390. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192560.
  26. Krishna, N.S. and Hanuma P. (2020), "Pushover analysis of steel structures", Sci. Res. Eng. Trends., 6(5), 2930-2932.
  27. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration modeling of steel components in support to collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading", J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
  28. Manjula, N.K. and Nagarajan, P. (2013), "A comparison of basic pushover methods", Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2(5), 14-19.
  29. Moghaddam, H. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2006), "An investigation on the accuracy of pushover analysis for estimating the seismic deformation of braced steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 62(4), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.07.009.
  30. Mohammadi, M., Kafi, M.A, Kheyroddin, A. and Ronagh, H.R. (2020), "Performance of innovative composite bucklingrestrained fuse for concentrically braced frames under cyclic loading", Steel Compos. Struct., 36(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.2.163.
  31. Mohammadzadeh, B. and Kang, J. (2021), "Seismic analysis of high-rise steel frame building considering irregularities in plan and elevation", Steel Compos. Struct., 39(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.1.065.
  32. Monteiro, S.R.S., Martins, C, Dias, A.M.P.G. and Cruz, H. (2020), "Mechanical performance of glulam products made with Portuguese poplar", Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 78, 1007-1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01569-y.
  33. Moore, M. (2000), "Scotia place - 12 story apartment building: A case study of high-rise construction using wood and steel", NZ Timber Des. J., 10 (1), 5-12.
  34. Panyakapo, P. (2014), "Cyclic pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings", Eng. Struct., 66, 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.001.
  35. Popovski, M., Prion H.G.L. and Karacabeyli E. (2003), "Shake table tests on single-storey braced timber frames", Can. J. Civ. Eng., 30 (6), 1089-1100. https://doi.org/10.1139/l03-060
  36. Reyes, J.C., Smith-Pardo, J.P., Yamin, L.E., Galvis, F.A., Sandoval, J.D., Gonzalez, C.D. and Correal, J.F. (2019), "Inplane seismic behavior of full-scale earthen walls with openings retrofitted with timber elements and vertical tensors", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(7), 4193-4215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00601-8.
  37. Seifi, M., Noorzaei, J., Jaafar, M.S. and Panah, E. (2008). Nonlinear static pushover analysis in earthquake engineering: State of development. In Proceeding of International Conference on Construction Building Technology, Kuala Lumpur.
  38. Shahryari, h., Karami, M. R. and Chiniforush, A.A. (2019), "Summarized IDA curves by the wavelet transform and bees optimization algorithm", Earthq. Struct., 16(2), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.2.165.
  39. Stazi, F., Serpilli, M., Maracchini, G. and Pavone, A. (2019), "An experimental and numerical study on CLT panels used as infill shear walls for RC buildings retrofit," Constr. Build. Mater., 211, 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.196.
  40. Taiyari, F., Federico, M.M. and Bagheri, S. (2019), "Seismic performance assessment of steel building frames equipped with a novel type of bending dissipative braces", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.4.525.
  41. Timmers, M. and Jacobs, A.T. (2018), "Concrete apartment tower in Los Angeles reimagined in mass timber", Eng. Struct., 167, 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.047.
  42. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
  43. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2004), "Applied incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Spectra., 20(2), 523-553. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737737.