Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surgical Techniques to Prevent Nipple-Areola Complex Malposition in Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

  • Komiya, Takako (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University) ;
  • Ojima, Yosuke (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University) ;
  • Ishikawa, Takashi (Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical University) ;
  • Matsumura, Hajime (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University)
  • Received : 2022.01.04
  • Accepted : 2022.06.23
  • Published : 2022.09.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Appropriate position of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is crucial following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The prevention of NAC malposition in two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction has not been well described, and the efficacy of the techniques has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our technique to prevent NAC malposition in patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after NSM. Methods Patients who underwent two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with NSM between January 2012 and December 2019 were included. We used a surgical technique to fix the NAC to the rigid base, assuming a pocket-like appearance, with pectoralis major muscle and lateral adipofascial flap at the time of tissue expander (TE) insertion. Patients were classified into two groups based on the performance of the technique for the prevention of NAC malposition. Results In 35 patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after NSM, the clavicle-to-nipple distance ratio was 96.0±5.0% in those who underwent NAC fixation and 86.1±11.5% in those who did not undergo NAC fixation. Conclusions Using our technique, NAC malposition could be prevented in two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. NAC fixation during TE insertion was found to be extremely effective. This procedure successfully prevented NAC malposition without the formation of extra scars.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Dr. Tatsuya Isomura, Division of Clinical Research Consultation of Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, for helpful discussions about the statistical analysis.

References

  1. Choi M, Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS. Nipple-areola complex malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a review of risk factors and corrective techniques from greater than 1000 reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140(02):247e-257e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003507
  2. Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(03):818-829 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ccdaa4
  3. Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, et al. Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22(10):3324-3330 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4761-3
  4. Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Andrea M, et al. Free nipple graft technique to correct nipple and areola malposition after breast procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013;1(08):e69 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000002
  5. Takayanagi S. Transposition of the malpositioned nipple-areola complex in breast reconstruction with implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010;34(01):52-58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9431-z
  6. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr., Karas T, Cohen BE. Nippleareola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(02):457-463, discussion 464-465 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200208000-00013
  7. Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, Dent BL, Taylor EM, Talmor M. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133(05):1053-1062 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000094
  8. Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(04):1137-1144 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2099-z
  9. Swanson E. Correction of postoperative nipple/areola malposition without nipple grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2(03):e117 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000073
  10. Mori H, Uemura N, Okazaki M, Nakagawa T, Sato T. Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction. Breast Cancer 2016;23(05):740-744 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0633-8
  11. Frenkiel BA, Pacifico MD, Ritz M, Southwick G. A solution to the high-riding nipple-areola complex. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010;34(04):525-527 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9421-1
  12. Mohmand H, Naasan A. Double U-plasty for correction of geometric malposition of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(06):2019-2022 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00036
  13. Taneda H, Sakai S. Transposition technique for correction of a malpositioned nipple-areola complex after reconstruction following a nipple-sparing mastectomy: a case report. Ann Plast Surg 2011;67(06):579-582 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181ff76ca
  14. Flessas I, Michalopoulos NV, Zografos GC. Nipple malposition following nipple-sparing mastectomy. How can we prevent it? Breast J 2016;22(01):131-132 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12538
  15. Doren EL, Van Eldik Kuykendall L, Lopez JJ, Laronga C, Smith PD. Free nipple grafting: an alternative for patients ineligible for nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Plast Surg 2014;72(06):S112-S115 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000077