Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제49권5호
  • /
  • Pages.569-579
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

  • 투고 : 2022.01.01
  • 심사 : 2022.04.18
  • 발행 : 2022.09.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Open and closed rhinoplasty are two main approaches to perform nasal modifications. According to current literature, there is no current consensus among plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists on which technique is preferred in terms of aesthetic result, complications, and patient satisfaction. This study uses published research to determine whether open or closed rhinoplasty leads to superior patient outcomes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews were followed and a literature search was conducted in four databases based on our search strategy. Articles were then imported into COVIDENCE where they underwent primary screening and full-text review. Twenty articles were selected in this study after 243 articles were screened. There were 4 case series, 12 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 1 case-control, and 2 outcomes research. There were three cosmetic studies, eight functional studies, and nine studies that included both cosmetic and functional components. Sixteen studies utilized both open and closed rhinoplasty and four utilized open rhinoplasty. Both techniques demonstrated high patient and provider satisfaction and no advantage was found between techniques. Based on available studies, we cannot conclude if there is a preference between open or closed rhinoplasty in terms of which technique leads to better patient outcomes. Several studies determined that open rhinoplasty and closed rhinoplasty leads to comparative patient satisfaction. To make outcome reporting more reliable and uniform among studies, authors should look to utilize the Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness scale and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gowen L, Mawr B. Two types of rhinoplasty explained - cosmetic vs functional. July 23, 2019. Accessed November 25, 2021 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/blog/two-types-of-rhinoplasty-explained-cosmetic-vs-functional
  2. O'Hara J, Ruggiero F, Wilson L, et al. Syndromic craniosynostosis: complexities of clinical care. Mol Syndromol 2019;10(1-2):83-97 https://doi.org/10.1159/000495739
  3. 2020 Plastic Surgery Statistics. Updated April 21, 2021. Accessed November 25, 2021, at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/ plastic-surgery-statistics
  4. Tasman AJ. Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;6:Doc09
  5. Rohrich RJ, Afrooz PN. Primary open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144(01):102e-117e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005778
  6. Momeni A, Gruber RP. Primary open rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36(09):983-992 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw093
  7. Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(05):1298-1308, discussion 1309-1312 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000135861.45986.CF
  8. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. External approach for secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80(02):161-174 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198708000-00001
  9. Jayarajan R, Natarajan A, Nagamuttu R. Outcomes of closed versus open technique of rhinoplasty during primary repair of unilateral cleft lip: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2019;56(01):74-83 https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618787689
  10. Fichman M, Piedra Buena IT. Rhinoplasty. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing June 29, 2021
  11. Tebbetts JB. Open and closed rhinoplasty (minus the "versus"): analyzing processes. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26(04):456-459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.06.003
  12. Schreiber JE, Marcus E, Tepper O, Layke J. Discovering the true resolution of postoperative swelling after rhinoplasty using 3- dimensional photographic assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7(08):11-12 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000584252.84509.e7
  13. Shemshadi H, Azimian M, Onsori MA, Azizabadi Farahani M. Olfactory function following open rhinoplasty: a 6-month follow-up study. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2008;8:6 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-8-6
  14. Dengiz R, Haytoglu S, Gorgulu O, Dogru M, Arikan OK. Effect of septorhinoplasty on olfactory function: assessment using the brief smell identification test. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;53(01):4-9 https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2015.694
  15. Toriumi DM, Kowalczyk DM, Cristel RT, et al. Evaluation of postoperative infection rates in 3084 rhinoplasty cases using antibiotic soaks and/or irrigations. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021;23(05):368-374 https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0465
  16. Rettinger G. Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;6:Doc08
  17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372(71):n71
  18. Motamed S, Otaghvar HA, Niazi F, Moosavizadeh SM, Motaghedi B, Tizmaghz A. Introducing a favourite tip definition and projection with tripod suture in rhinoplasty. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(01):PC05-PC07
  19. Jaberoo MC, De Zoysa N, Mehta N, et al. A twin-center study of nasal tip numbness following septorhinoplasty or rhinoplasty. Ear Nose Throat J 2016;95(02):E18-E21 https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131609500206
  20. Paul MA, Kamali P, Chen AD, et al. Assessment of functional rhinoplasty with spreader grafting using acoustic rhinomanometry and validated outcome measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6(03):e1615 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001615
  21. Han SK, Woo HS, Kim WK. Extended incision in open-approach rhinoplasty for Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(06):2087-2096 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00047
  22. Ozmen S, Ayhan S, Findikcioglu K, Kandal S, Atabay K. Upper lateral cartilage fold-in flap: a combined spreader and/or splay graft effect without cartilage grafts. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61(05):527-532 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31816dd359
  23. Howard BK, Rohrich RJ. Understanding the nasal airway: principles and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(03):1128-1146, quiz 1145-1146 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200203000-00054
  24. Sevin A, Sevin K, Erdogan B, Deren O, Adanali G. Open rhinoplasty without transcolumellar incision. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57(03):252-254 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000221544.41325.d2
  25. Guerrerosantos J. Open rhinoplasty without skin-columella incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85(06):955-960 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199006000-00022
  26. Won Kim S, Pio Hong J, Kee Min W, Wan Seo D, Kyu Chung Y. Accurate, firm stabilization using external pins: a proposal for closed reduction of unfavorable nasal bone fractures and their simple classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(05):1240--1246, discussion 1247-1248
  27. Cardenas-Camarena L, Guerrero MT. Improving nasal tip projection and definition using interdomal sutures and open approach without transcolumellar incision. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26(03):161-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-002-1488-x
  28. Gruber RP, Park E, Newman J, Berkowitz L, Oneal R. The spreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119(06):1903-1910 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000259198.42852.d4
  29. Kilic C, Tuncel u, Comert E, Sencan Z. Effect of the rhinoplasty technique and lateral osteotomy on periorbital edema and ecchymosis. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(05):e430-e433 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001885
  30. Kim HS, Suh HW, Ha KY, Kim BY, Kim TY. The usefulness of the endonasal incisional approach for the treatment of nasal bone fracture. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39(03):209-215 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.3.209
  31. Metin M, Avcu M. The effect on patient satisfaction of the postoperative nasal topographic, demographic, and functional results of open and closed septorhinoplasty techniques. J Craniofac Surg 2021;32(03):868-873 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007120
  32. Reilly MJ, Davison SP. Open vs closed approach to the nasal pyramid for fracture reduction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9(02):82-86 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.9.2.82
  33. Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O. Cosmetics and function: qualityof-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 2012;122(02):254-259 https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22390
  34. Talmadge J, High R, Heckman WW. Comparative outcomes in functional rhinoplasty with open vs endonasal spreader graft placement. Ann Plast Surg 2018;80(05):468-471 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001434
  35. Uppal R, Yousif AH, Maheshwari K. Outcome-based comparative study to examine the correction of columella deformities following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8(07):e3001 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003001
  36. Okur MI, Gokdemir O, Karasu N, Yildirim AM. Comparison of nasal senses following open and closed rhinoplasty. Turk J Med Sci 2016;46(02):287-290 https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1405-52
  37. YoonT, Kim Y. Postoperative satisfactionin nasal bone fracture patients who had rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(07):1707-1710 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002928
  38. Gokce Kutuk S, Arikan OK. Evaluation of the effects of open and closed rhinoplasty on the psychosocial stress level and quality of life of rhinoplasty patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019;72(08):1347-1354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.020
  39. Kirgezen T, Yigit O, Taskin U, Cakir ZA, Adatepe T. Electromyographic and electroneurographic changes in internal nasal muscles after endonasal and external rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31(03):297-301 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11398478