DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Thickness evaluation of Cr coating fuel rod using encircling ECT sensor

  • Park, Jeong Won (Intelligent Wave Engineering Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)) ;
  • Ha, Jong Moon (Intelligent Wave Engineering Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)) ;
  • Seung, Hong Min (Intelligent Wave Engineering Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)) ;
  • Jang, Hun (Materials Development Team, Koras Electric Power Corporation Nuclear Fuel (KEPCO NF)) ;
  • Choi, Wonjae (Intelligent Wave Engineering Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS))
  • Received : 2022.01.11
  • Accepted : 2022.03.24
  • Published : 2022.09.25

Abstract

To improve the safety and life extension qualities of nuclear fuel rods which is currently made of zirconium (Zr) alloy, research on the application of chromium (Cr) coating was conducted. Cr coating has advantages such as increased corrosion resistance and reduced oxidation rate, but non-destructive thickness evaluation studies are needed to ensure the reliability of the steps taken to provide uniform coating thickness. Eddy current testing (ECT) is a representative non-destructive technique for such as thickness evaluation and surface defect inspection. To inspect changes in thickness at micron scale, the Swept Frequency Eddy Current Testing (SFECT) method was applied to select a frequency range sensitive to changes in thickness. The coating thickness was evaluated using changes in signals, such as that for impedance. In this study, basic research was performed to evaluate the thickness of the Cr coating on a rod using an encircling sensor and the SFECT technique. The sensor design parameters were determined through simulation, after which the new sensor was manufactured. A sensor capable of measuring the thickness of a non-uniformly Cr-coating rod was selected through an experiment evaluating the performance of the manufactured sensor. This was done using the impedance-difference of a Cr-coating rod and a Zr alloy rod. The possibility of evaluation of the Cr coating thickness was confirmed by comparing the experimental results with the selected sensor and the signals of the measured Cr-coating rod. All simulation results were verified experimentally.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was carried out with the support of the project 'Development of Safety Enhanced Nuclear Core Technology for APR0 (Research Number: 20217810100050) supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP).

References

  1. Nagase Fumihisa, Otomo Takashi, Hiroshi Uetsuka, Oxidation kinetics of lowSn zircaloy-4 at the temperature range from 773 to 1573k, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 40 (No.4) (2003) 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2003.9715351
  2. E.A. Pfief, Z. Jones, Submerged eddy current method of hydrogen content evaluation of Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding, AIP Conf. Proc. 1335 (2011) 1168.
  3. Warren E. Berry, Dale a. Vaughan, Hydrogen pickup during aqueous corrosion of zirconium alloys, Corrosion 17 (No. 3) (1961) 109-117.
  4. KAERI, Structural Deformation Evaluation of Spent Nuclear Fuel for Dry Storage, Report, 2010.
  5. E. P Lee, E. K Kim, Y.B. Jeon, Non-and destructive measurements on oxide thicknesses of spent fuel cladding, in: Korean Nuclear Society Conference, 2003.
  6. Woong-Ki Kim, Su-Sung Kim, Chul Yong Lee, A study on the non-destructive inspection for end closure welding of nuclear fuel elements for the irradiation test, in: The Korean Welding and Joining Society Conference, 2004.
  7. Hung-Chi Yang, Cheng-Chi Tai, Pulsed eddy-current measurement of a conducting coating on a magnetic metal plate, Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 (No. 8) (2002) 1259-1265. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/13/8/313
  8. R. Montgomery, B.B. Bevard, R.N. Morris, JS goddard "sister rod nondestructive examination final report, Manag. Radioact. Non-Radioact. Waste Nucl. Facil. (2018).
  9. A.S. Krukov, E.G. Shchukis, N.P. Kodak, V.P. Lunin, Design of multi-probe for fuel-elements cladding eddy current testing, J. Phys. Conf. (2020).
  10. A. Farr, A.M. Allard, S. Savard, ZETEC, Canada, "Eddy Current Array Probe for Nuclear Fuel Rod Inspection," 7th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Component, 2019.
  11. Young-Kil Shin, Yun-Tai Lee, Drawing of impedance plane diagrams of absolute coil ECT signals by finite rlement analysis, J. Korean Soc. 24 (No. 4) (2004) 315-324.
  12. W. Yin, A.J. Peyton, Thickness measurement of non-magnetic plates using multi-frequency eddy current sensors, NDT&E Int. 40 (No. 1) (2007) 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.07.009
  13. A.K. Das, Chhabra Amit, Dr Avijit Mondal, Frequency Scanning Eddy Current Testing (F-SECT) for Condition Assessment of Multiple Layers of Coating on Gas Turbine Blades, NDE, 2015.
  14. R. Hughes, Y. Fan, Near electrical resonance signal enhancement (NERSE) in eddy-current crack detection, NDT&E Int. 66 (2014) 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.04.009
  15. Jong Min Kim, Study of Eddy Current Testing Method for Evaluating Property of Interface in Thermal Barrier Coating" Thesis, 2017.
  16. John C. Moulder, Erol Uzal, Thickness and conductivity of metallic layers from eddy current measurements, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63 (6) (1992) 3455-3465. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1143749
  17. C.V. Dodd, W.E. Deeds, Analytical solutions to eddy-current probe-coil problems, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (No. 6) (1968).
  18. F.U.E.L. KEPCO NYCLEAR, Accident Tolerant fuels development status and combustion test plan, in: Safety Analysis Symposium, 2019.
  19. Javier Garcia-Martin, Jaime Gomez-Gil, Ernesto Vazquez-Sanchez, Nondestructive techniques based on eddy current testing, Sens. Rev. 11 (No. 3) (2011) 2525-2565. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110302525
  20. Satish S. Udpa, Patrick O. Moore, "Electromagnetic Testing Hand Book," ASNT.
  21. Donald J. Hagemaier, "Fundamentals of Eddy Current Testing," ASNT.