DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cranioplasty for Multilobular Osteochondrosarcoma Using 3-Dimensional Printing Technology in Dogs: A Report of Two Cases with a Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Heo, Seong-Hyeon (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Beom (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jae-Min (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Jin (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Hyun (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Mok (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Roh, Yoon-Ho (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2022.04.11
  • Accepted : 2022.09.20
  • Published : 2022.10.31

Abstract

Multilobular osteochondrosarcoma (MLO) reportedly has a good prognosis after complete resection. This study reports the successful treatment of MLO in two dogs using 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology. A nine-year-old castrated male Maltese (Case 1) and a five-year-old castrated male poodle (Case 2) both presented with a mass in the skull. Diagnostic imaging revealed a cranial mass arising from the cranio-orbital and parieto-occipital bones. The masses were resected using 3D-printed osteotomy guides, and the resulting defects were reconstructed using 3D-printed patient-specific implants. Histopathological results confirmed the resection of MLOs with clean margins. Patients routinely recover from surgery without complications. To date, the two patients remain alive without clinical signs of tumor recurrence at 20 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. In the management of MLO in dogs, 3D printing technology can allow accurate tumor resection, reduced surgical time, and successful reconstruction of large defects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Research Scholarship of the Chungnam National University.

References

  1. Bellanova L, Paul L, Docquier PL. Surgical guides (patient-specific instruments) for pediatric tibial bone sarcoma resection and allograft reconstruction. Sarcoma 2013; 2013: 787653.
  2. Berli JU, Thomaier L, Zhong S, Huang J, Quinones A, Lim M, et al. Immediate single-stage cranioplasty following calvarial resection for benign and malignant skull neoplasms using customized craniofacial implants. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001816
  3. Blakeney WG, Day R, Cusick L, Smith RL. Custom osteotomy guides for resection of a pelvic chondrosarcoma. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 438-441. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.920988
  4. Bryant KJ, Steinberg H, McAnulty JF. Cranioplasty by means of molded polymethylmethacrylate prosthetic reconstruction after radical excision of neoplasms of the skull in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 67-72, 59. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.67
  5. Choi S, Honnami M, Liu IL, Yamamoto K, Ohba S, Echigo R, et al. Cranioplasty with custom-made artificial bone after resection of multilobular bone tumor in a dog. J Vet Clin 2014; 31: 46-50. https://doi.org/10.17555/ksvc.2014.02.31.1.46
  6. Cook S, Civello A, Lam R, Fenn J, Neilson D, Priestnall S, et al. Rapid postoperative recurrence of a cranial multilobular tumor of bone in a young dog. Clin Case Rep 2017; 5: 1995-1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1243
  7. de Casterle AD, Van Goethem B, Kitshoff A, Bhatti S, Gielen I, Bosmans T. Titanium mesh reconstruction of a dog's cranium after multilobular osteochondrosarcoma resection. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdsch 2017; 86: 232-240.
  8. Dernell WS, Straw RC, Cooper MF, Powers BE, LaRue SM, Withrow SJ. Multilobular osteochondrosarcoma in 39 dogs: 1979- 1993. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998; 34: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-34-1-11
  9. Gallegos J, Schwarz T, McAnulty JF. Massive midline occipitotemporal resection of the skull for treatment of multilobular osteochondrosarcoma in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 752-757. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.233.5.752
  10. Hadley C, Gressot LV, Patel AJ, Wang LL, Flores RJ, Whitehead WE, et al. Osteosarcoma of the cranial vault and skull base in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 13: 380-387. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.12.PEDS13359
  11. Hayes GM, Demeter EA, Choi E, Oblak M. Single-stage craniectomy and cranioplasty for multilobular osteochondrosarcoma managed with a custom additive manufactured titanium plate in a dog. Case Rep Vet Med 2019; 2019: 6383591.
  12. Hespel AM, Wilhite R, Hudson J. Invited review--applications for 3D printers in veterinary medicine. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55: 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12176
  13. Holmes ME, Keyerleber MA, Faissler D. Prolonged survival after craniectomy with skull reconstruction and adjuvant definitive radiation therapy in three dogs with multilobular osteochondrosarcoma. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2019; 60: 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12750
  14. Jalbert F, Boetto S, Nadon F, Lauwers F, Schmidt E, Lopez R. Onestep primary reconstruction for complex craniofacial resection with PEEK custom-made implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42: 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.04.001
  15. James J, Oblak ML, Zur Linden AR, James FMK, Phillips J, Parkes M. Schedule feasibility and workflow for additive manufacturing of titanium plates for ranioplasty in canine skull tumors. BMC Vet Res 2020; 16: 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02343-1
  16. Kudnig ST, Seguin B. Veterinary surgical oncology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2012.
  17. Kuipers von Lande RG, Worth AJ, Peckitt NS, Cave NJ, Tang L. Rapid prototype modeling and customized titanium plate fabrication for correction of a persistent hard palate defect in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 240: 1316-1322. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.240.11.1316
  18. Ma L, Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Lin Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. 3D-printed guiding templates for improved osteosarcoma resection. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 23335. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23335
  19. Meetze K, Palmer JN, Schlosser RJ. Frontal sinus complications after frontal craniotomy. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 945-948. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200405000-00031
  20. Moissonnier P, Devauchelle P, Delisle F. Cranioplasty after en bloc resection of calvarial chondroma rodens in two dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1997; 38: 358-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1997.tb03486.x
  21. Mouatt JG. Acrylic cranioplasty and axial pattern flap following calvarial and cerebral mass excision in a dog. Aust Vet J 2002; 80: 211-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2002.tb10815.x
  22. Mulford JS, Babazadeh S, Mackay N. Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: review of current and future applications. ANZ J Surg 2016; 86: 648-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13533
  23. O'Brien CS, Bagley RS, Hicks DG, Chen AV, Wininger FA, Brumitt JW. Gamma-irradiated calvarium allograft cranioplasty in a cat following brain tumor removal. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2010; 46: 268-273. https://doi.org/10.5326/0460268
  24. Oji T, Sakamoto Y, Miwa T, Nakagawa Y, Yoshida K, Kishi K. Usefulness of an osteotomy template for skull tumorectomy and simultaneous skull reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27: 1565-1567. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002841
  25. Policicchio D, Casu G, Dipellegrini G, Doda A, Muggianu G, Boccaletti R. Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh. Surg Neurol Int 2020; 11: 148. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_35_2020
  26. Pucci JU, Christophe BR, Sisti JA, Connolly ES Jr. Three-dimensional printing: technologies, applications, and limitations in neurosurgery. Biotechnol Adv 2017; 35: 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.007
  27. Rosselli DD, Platt SR, Freeman C, O'Neill J, Kent M, Holmes SP. Cranioplasty using titanium mesh after skull tumor resection in five dogs. Vet Surg 2017; 46: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12577
  28. Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, Schumacher R, Park YT, Kim SG, et al. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: e169-e176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.036
  29. Straw RC, LeCouteur RA, Powers BE, Withrow SJ. Multilobular osteochondrosarcoma of the canine skull: 16 cases (1978-1988). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195: 1764-1769.
  30. Sweet KA, Nolan MW, Yoshikawa H, Gieger TL. Stereotactic radiation therapy for canine multilobular osteochondrosarcoma: eight cases. Vet Comp Oncol 2020; 18: 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12481
  31. Vancil JM, Henry CJ, Milner RJ, McCoig AM, Lattimer JC, Villamil JA, et al. Use of samarium Sm 153 lexidronam for the treatment of dogs with primary tumors of the skull: 20 cases (1986-2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 240: 1310-1315. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.240.11.1310
  32. Wang F, Zhu J, Peng X, Su J. The application of 3D printed surgical guides in resection and reconstruction of malignant bone tumor. Oncol Lett 2017; 14: 4581-4584. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6749
  33. Williams LR, Fan KF, Bentley RP. Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44: 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.006
  34. Wong KC, Sze LKY, Kumta SM. Complex joint-preserving bone tumor resection and reconstruction using computer navigation and 3D-printed patient-specific guides: a technical note of three cases. J Orthop Translat 2021; 29: 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2021.05.009
  35. Wu G, Liang Q, Liu Y. Primary osteosarcoma of frontal bone: a case report and review of literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e9392. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009392
  36. Yashin KS, Ermolaev AY, Ostapyuk MV, Kutlaeva MA, Rasteryaeva MV, Mlyavykh SG, et al. Case report: simultaneous resection of bone tumor and CAD/CAM titanium cranioplasty in fronto-orbital region. Front Surg 2021; 8: 718725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.718725