Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discrepancies Between Implementation and Perceived Effectiveness of Leading Safety Indicators in the US Dairy Product Manufacturing Industry

  • Derlyke, Peter Van (Peco Foods) ;
  • Marin, Luz S. (Department of Safety Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania) ;
  • Zreiqat, Majed (Department of Safety Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania)
  • Received : 2022.02.19
  • Accepted : 2022.04.25
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: In the United States, the dairy product manufacturing industry has consistently had higher rates of work-related nonfatal injuries and illnesses compared to the national average for industries in all sectors. The selection and implementation of appropriate safety performance indicators are important aspect of reducing risk within safety management systems. This study examined the leading safety indicators implemented in the dairy product-manufacturing sector (NAICS 3115) and their perceived effectiveness in reducing work-related injuries. Methods: Perceptions were collected from individuals with safety responsibilities in the dairy product manufacturing facilities. OSHA Incident Rate (OIR) and Days away, restricted and transferred (DART) rates from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed. Results: The perceived most effective leading were safety observations, stop work authority, near miss reporting, safety audits, preventative maintenance, safety inspections, safety training attendance, and job hazard analysis/safety analysis, respectively. The 6-year trend analysis showed that those implementing all eight top indicators had a slightly lower rates than those that did not implement all eight. Production focused mentality, poor training, and lack of management commitment were perceived as the leading causes of injuries in this industry. Conclusion: Collecting leading indicators with the unique interest to meet the regulatory requirements and to document the management system without the actual goal of using them as input to improve the system most probably will not lead to an effective reduction of negative safety outcomes. For leading indicators to be effective, they should be properly selected, executed, periodically evaluated and actions are taken when necessary.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the daily companies, safety professionals, and personnel with safety responsibilities who participated in this study.

References

  1. Douphrate DI, Hagevoort GR, Nonnenmann MW, Lunner Kolstrup C, Reynolds SJ, Jakob M, et al. The dairy industry: a brief description of production practices, trends, and farm characteristics around the world. J Agromed 2013;18:187-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2013.796901
  2. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Injuries, illnesses, and fatalities; 2020.
  3. Lingard H, Hallowell M, Salas R, Pirzadeh P. Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project. Saf Sci 2017;91:206-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.020
  4. Lingard H, Rowlinson S. Occupational health and safety in construction project management. London: Spon Press; 2005.
  5. Antao P, Calderon M, Puig M, Michail A, Wooldridge C, Darbra RM. Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance indicators in port areas. Saf Sci 2016;85:266-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.031
  6. Dennerlein JT, Weinstein D, Huynh W, Tessler J, Bigger L, Murphy L, et al. Associations between a safety prequalification survey and worker safety experiences on commercial construction sites. Am J Ind Med 2020;63:766-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23143
  7. Grabowski TB, Isely JJ. Effects of flow fluctuations on the spawning habitat of a riverine fish. Southeast Nat 2007;6:471-8. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2007)6[471:EOFFOT]2.0.CO;2
  8. Manjourides J, Dennerlein JT. Testing the associations between leading and lagging indicators in a contractor safety pre-qualification database. Am J Ind Med 2019;62:317-24.
  9. Minnick WD, Wachter JK. The role of leading and lagging indicators in evaluating OSH professionals' performance. Prof Saf 2019;64:32-6.
  10. Zwetsloot G, Leka S, Kines P. Vision zero: from accident prevention to the promotion of health, safety and well-being at work. Policy Pract Health Saf 2017;15:88-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2017.1308701
  11. Hollnagel E, Wears RL, Braithwaite J. From safety-I to safety-II: a white paper. Australia: University of Southern Denmark, University of Florida, USA, and Macquarie University; 2015.
  12. Reiman T, Pietikainen E. Leading indicators of system safety - monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Saf Sci 2012;50:1993-2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.015
  13. Guo BH, Yiu TW. Developing leading indicators to monitor the safety conditions of construction projects. J Manag Eng 2016;32:04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000376
  14. Yule S. Safety culture and safety climate: a review of the literature; 2008.
  15. Xu J, Cheung C, Manu P, Ejohwomu O. Safety leading indicators in construction: a systematic review. Saf Sci 2021;139:105250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105250
  16. Sinelnikov S, Inouye J, Kerper S. Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance. Saf Sci 2015;72:240-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.010
  17. Sheehan C, Donohue R, Shea T, Cooper B, De Cieri H. Leading and lagging indicators of occupational health and safety: the moderating role of safety leadership. Accid Anal Prevent 2016;92:130-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.018
  18. Inouye J. Practical guide to leading indicators: metrics, case studies & strategies. The Campbell Institute National Safety Council; 2015.
  19. Williamsen M. Near-miss reporting: a missing link in safety culture. Prof Saf 2013;58:46-50.
  20. Legendre P. Coefficient of concordance. Encycl Res Des 2010;1:164-9.
  21. Schmidt RC. Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques*. Decis Sci 1997;28:763-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
  22. Alruqi WM, Hallowell MR. Critical success factors for construction safety: review and meta-analysis of safety leading indicators. J Constr Eng Manag 2019;145:04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001626
  23. Alarcon LF, Acuna D, Diethelm S, Pellicer E. Strategies for improving safety performance in construction firms. Accid Anal Prev 2016;94:107-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.021
  24. Pawlowska Z. Using lagging and leading indicators for the evaluation of occupational safety and health performance in industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergonom 2015;21:284-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1081769
  25. Rajendran S. Enhancing construction worker safety performance using leading indicators. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 2013;18:45-51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000137
  26. Kjellen U. The safety measurement problem revisited. Saf Sci 2009;47:486-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.023
  27. Lee J, Huang Y-h, Cheung JH, Chen Z, Shaw WS. A systematic review of the safety climate intervention literature: past trends and future directions. J Occup Health Psychol 2019;24:66. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000113
  28. Namian M, Albert A, Zuluaga CM, Behm M. Role of safety training: impact on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. J Constr Eng Manag 2016;142:04016073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001198
  29. Eiris R, Gheisari M, Esmaeili B. PARS: using augmented 360-degree panoramas of reality for construction safety training. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112452
  30. Jeelani I, Albert A, Azevedo R, Jaselskis EJ. Development and testing of a personalized hazard-recognition training intervention. J Constr Eng Manag 2017;143:04016120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001256
  31. Niu M, Leicht RM, Rowlinson S. Developing safety climate indicators in a construction working environment. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 2017;22:04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000340
  32. Hallowell MR, Hinze JW, Baud KC, Wehle A. Proactive construction safety control: measuring, monitoring, and responding to safety leading indicators. J Constr Eng Manag 2013;139:04013010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000730
  33. Weber DE, MacGregor SC, Provan DJ, Rae A. "We can stop work, but then nothing gets done." Factors that support and hinder a workforce to discontinue work for safety. Saf Sci 2018;108:149-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.032
  34. Liang H, Zhang S, Su Y. Using leading and lagging indicators to select safe contractors at the prequalification stage of construction projects. Int J Occup Environ Health 2018;24:61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2018.1517928
  35. Oswald D, Zhang R, Lingard H, Pirzadeh P, Le T. The use and abuse of safety indicators in construction. Eng Constr Archit Manag 2018;25:1188-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2017-0121
  36. Versteeg K, Bigelow P, Dale AM, Chaurasia A. Utilizing construction safety leading and lagging indicators to measure project safety performance: a case study. Saf Sci 2019;120:411-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.035
  37. Leveson N. A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2015;136:17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.008