Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The acoustic cue-weighting and the L2 production-perception link: A case of English-speaking adults' learning of Korean stops

  • Kong, Eun Jong (Department of English, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Kang, Soyoung (School of Linguistics and Language Studies, Carleton University) ;
  • Seo, Misun (Department of English Language and Literature, Hannam University)
  • Received : 2022.08.13
  • Accepted : 2022.09.13
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The current study examined English-speaking adult learners' production and perception of L2 Korean stops (/t/ or /t'/ or /th/) to investigate whether the two modalities are linked in utilizing voice onset time (VOT) and fundamental frequency (F0) for the L2 sound distinction and how the learners' L2 proficiency mediates the relationship. Twenty-two English-speaking learners of Korean living in Seoul participated in the word-reading task of producing stop-initial words and the identification task of labelling CV stimuli synthesized to vary VOT and F0. Using logistic mixed-effects regression models, we quantified group- and individual-level weights of the VOT and F0 cues in differentiating the tense-lax, lax-aspirated, and tense-aspirated stops in Korean. The results showed that the learners as a group relied on VOT more than F0 both in production and perception (except the tense-lax pair), reflecting the dominant role of VOT in their L1 stop distinction. Individual-level analyses further revealed that the learners' L2 proficiency was related to their use of F0 in L2 production and their use of VOT in L2 perception. With this effect of L2 proficiency controlled in the partial correlation tests, we found a significant correlation between production and perception in using VOT and F0 for the lax-aspirated stop contrast. However, the same correlation was absent for the other stop pairs. We discuss a contrast-specific role of acoustic cues to address the non-uniform patterns of the production-perception link in the L2 sound learning context.

Keywords

References

  1. Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(4), 981-1005. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01725-4
  2. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
  3. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O. S. Bohn, & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13-34). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.2.14) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
  5. Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299-2310. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418276
  6. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233-277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
  7. Flege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In N. O. Schiller, & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities(pp. 319-355). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
  8. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437-470. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
  9. Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.349
  10. Hanulikova, A., Dediu, D., Fang, Z., Basnakova, J., & Huettig, F. (2012). Individual differences in the acquisition of a complex L2 phonology: A training study. Language Learning, 62(s2), 79-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00707.x
  11. Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2010, September). Examination of the relationship between L2 perception and production: An investigation of English /r/-/l/ perception and production by adult Japanese speakers. Proceedings of the Second Language Studies: Acquisition, Learning, Education and Technology. Tokyo, Japan.
  12. Huensch, A., & Tremblay, A. (2015). Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.007
  13. Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817-832. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4926561
  14. Kim, S. (2015). ppcor: an R package for a fast calculation to semi-partial correlation coefficients. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22(6), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.6.665
  15. Kong, E. J. (2019). Individual differences in categorical perception: L1 English learners' L2 perception of Korean stops. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 11(4), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.4.063
  16. Kong, E. J., & Yoon, I. H. (2013). L2 proficiency effect on the acoustic cue-weighting pattern by Korean L2 learners of English: Production and perception of English stops. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(4), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.4.081
  17. Lee, H., & Jongman, A. (2012). Effects of tone on the three-way laryngeal distinction in Korean: An acoustic and aerodynamic comparison of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(2), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100312000035
  18. Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F. II. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290-1305. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466879
  19. Melnik-Leroy, G. A., Turnbull, R., & Peperkamp, S. (2022). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones' processing of the French /u/-/y/ contrast. Second Language Research, 38(3), 581-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320988061
  20. Nagle, C. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12275
  21. Nagle, C. L. (2021). Revisiting perception-production relationships: Exploring a new approach to investigate perception as a time-varying predictor. Language Learning, 71(1), 243-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12431
  22. Peperkamp, S., & Bouchon, C. (2011, August). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Florence, Italy.
  23. Pinget, A. F., Kager, R., & Van de Velde, H. (2020). Linking variation in perception and production in sound change: Evidence from Dutch obstruent devoicing. Language and Speech, 63(3), 660-685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919880206
  24. Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2015). Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003
  25. Shultz, A. A., Francis, A. L., & Llanos, F. (2012). Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), EL95-EL101. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4736711
  26. Silva, D. J. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23(2), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000911
  27. Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1531176