한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제36권3호
  • /
  • Pages.397-415
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수학 교육회복을 위한 사례 연구: 교사의 수학적 은유 활용과 교사 담론의 구조를 중심으로

A Case Studies for the Recovery of Mathematics Education: Focusing on the Utilization of Teachers' Mathematical Metaphors and the Structure of Teacher Discourse

  • 투고 : 2022.08.18
  • 심사 : 2022.09.22
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 학생들의 흥미와 동기를 유발할 수 있는 수학적 은유를 활용하여 수업 참여에 도움을 줄 수 있는 교사의 담론 구조를 분석하는 것이다. 이러한 목적 달성을 위해 학생들의 경험과 수학적 개념을 연결하여 설명하는 교수법을 실행하는 경력 교사의 한 학기 수업을 관찰하였다. 연구 대상 교사가 한 학기 동안 수학적 개념과 문제 해결 과정에서 다양하게 활용한 은유 중에서, 일상생활과 수학적 내용을 단순히 연결하는 상황을 제외하고 은유를 활용하는 교수법 개발에 도움을 줄 수 있는 대표적인 수업 사례 2개 차시를 추출하였다. 대표적으로 선택된 2개 차시 수업은 은유를 활용하는 수업 사례 1개 차시와 은유를 활용하고 문제를 확장·적용하는 수업 사례 1개 차시이다. 분석 결과 학생들과의 소통을 기반으로 수학적 은유를 활용하는 교사의 담론 구조는 수학 교육회복을 위한 교수법 개발에 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the discourse structure of teachers that can help students participate in class by using mathematical metaphors that can arouse students' interest and motivation. In order to achieve this goal, we observed a semester class of a career teacher who practiced pedagogy that connects students' experiences with mathematical concepts to motivate students to learn and promote participation. Among the metaphors that the study target teachers used in a variety of mathematical concepts and problem-solving processes during the semester, we extracted the two class examples that can help develop teaching methods using metaphors. Representatively selected two classes are one class example using metaphors and, the other class example using metaphors and expanding and applying problems. As a result of analysis, the structure of teacher discourse that uses metaphors and expands and applies problems by linking students' experiences with mathematical content was found to help solve a given problem and elaborate mathematical concepts. As a result of the analysis, the discourse structure of teachers using mathematical metaphors based on communication with students could provide implications for the development of teaching methods for the recovery of mathematics education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang, O., Hwang, S., Kwon, E., Jeong, K., & Kim, Y. (2014). Middle schol mathematics 1, Seoul: Dosandonga.
  2. Ministry of Education (2021). The basic plan for comprehensive measures for educational recovery, Ministry of Education.
  3. Ministry of Education (2022). 2021 national level academic achievement evaluation results, Ministry of Education.
  4. Kim, D., Shin, J., Le, J., Lim, W., Le, Y., & Choi, S. (2019). Conceptualizing discursive teaching capacity: A case study of a middle schol mathematics teacher, Schol Mathematics, 21(2), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.06.21.2.291
  5. Kim, D., Choi, S., & Lee, J. (2020). Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers' Cognition in Curriculum for Developing their Discursive Competency, Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(2), 41-68. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.2.41
  6. Kim, S., & Shin, I. (2007). On the mathematical metaphors in the mathematics classroom, Education of Primary School Mathematics, 10(1), 29-39.
  7. Kim, S., & Lee, C. (2002). Abduction as a mathematical resoning., Journal of educational research in mathematics, 12(2), 275-290.
  8. Kim, S., Park, J., & Lee, M. (2010). Effects of the Elaboration Theory on an Elementary Science Instruction of Argumentation Activities, Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 217-240.
  9. Kim, J., Ha, H., & Han, J. (2008). A study on the analysis of errors and solutions in solving equation, Teacher Education Research, 47(1), 69-89.
  10. Kim, J. (2011). A Study of Teaching Methods Using Metaphor in Mathematics, School Mathematics, 13(4), 563-580.
  11. Kim, J., & Oh, Y. (2010). An Analysis of the Effects of Teaching Mathematics Underachievers by the Principles of Cognitively Guided Instruction, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 789-806.
  12. Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2014). Pre-service elementary school teachers' metaphors on mathematics textbooks, The Mathematical Education, 53(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2014.53.1.147
  13. Kim H., & Kang, S. (2017). A Study of Teaching Math Underachievers Using Flipped Classroom, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 20(4), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2017.20.4.009
  14. Park, M., & Park, Y. (2017). An Analysis on the Error According to Academic Achievement Level in the Fractional Computation Error of Elementary Sixth Graders, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.30.4.02
  15. Park, S., & Kim, D. (2005). Based on Reigeluth's elaboration strategy components through the activity of materials' dissolution, Research of Science and Mathematics Education, 28, 79-88.
  16. Park, H. (2008). An Analysis of the Errors of 1st-grade Middle School Students in Mathematical Symbols and Equations, Journal of Education & Culture, 14(1), 105-133.
  17. Seo, J. (2009). The Study of Response' Type according to a Position of Variable on Linear Equation* - Centering around the First and Third Grade of Middle School, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 12(3), 267-289.
  18. Eom, J., & Ryu, S. (2009). An Analysis of Children's Error Types in Fractional Computation, Journal of Elementary Education, 25(2), 67-91.
  19. Lee, K. (2010). The Role of Metaphor and Analogy in Didactic Transposition, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(1), 57-71.
  20. Lee, S. (2016). The Metaphorical Model of Archimedes' Idea on the Sum of Geometrical Series, School Mathetmaics, 18(1), 215-229.
  21. Lee, S., & Woo, J. (2002). Analogies and metaphors in school mathematics, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 7(4), 523-542.
  22. Lee, C., & Kim, B. (2006). The Effects of 'Error Detection-Correction Instruction' on Learning Linear Equations, Journal of Curriculum Education Research, 10(2), 461-483.
  23. Lee, C., & Choi, S. (2012). An Analysis on the Lingual Metaphors and Gestures Shown in the Math Class at Elementary School, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 16(1), 145-166.
  24. Choi, S. (2020a). Interaction patterns between teachers-students and teacher's discourse structures in mathematization processes, The Mathematical Education, 59(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2020.59.1.17
  25. Choi, S. (2020b). Teacher-student interaction patterns and teacher's discourse structures in understanding mathematical word problem, The Mathematical Education, 59(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2020.59.2.101
  26. Choi, S., Ha, J., & Kim, D. (2016). A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method, Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2016.30.3.375
  27. Hwang, J., & Kwon, S. (2011). Complex error types in mixed fractional and decimal calculations of 6th grade elementary school students, Journal of Elementary Education Research, 26, 127-146.
  28. Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9
  29. Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses, International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315-1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100
  30. Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Scherrer, J., McKeown, M., Greeno, J. & Ashley, K. (2015). Improving teaching at scale: Design for the scientific measurement and learning of discourse practice. Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. AERA, 284.
  31. Glaser, B. F., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Aldine de Gruyter.
  32. Gonzalez, G., & DeJarnette, A. (2015). Teachers' and students' negotiation moves when teachers scaffold group work. Cognition and Instruction, 33(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.987058
  33. Krussel, L., Edwards, B., & Springer, G. T. (2004). The teacher's discourse moves: A framework for analyzing discourse in mathematics classrooms, School Science and Mathematics, 104(7), 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18249.x
  34. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2006). Metaphors we live by(노양진.나익주 역), 박이정(원저는 1980년 출판).
  35. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2009). Metaphorical structure of mathematics: sketching out cognitive foundations for a mind-based mathematics, In English, L. (Ed.) Mathematical reasoning: analogies, metaphors, and images(25-102), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates(권석일.김성준.나귀수.남진영.박문환.박영희.변희현.서동엽.이경화.최병철.한대희.홍진곤 역), 경문사(원저는 1997년 출판).
  36. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons, Harvard University Press.
  37. Mehan, H. (1997). Students' interactional competence, In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez(Eds.), Mind, Culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition(pp. 235-240), Cambridge University Press.
  38. Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s, Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.934087
  39. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom, British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107
  40. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms, Open University Press.
  41. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176193
  42. Williams, S., & Baxter, J. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1086/461847