여성건강간호학회지 (Women's Health Nursing)

  • 제28권3호
  • /
  • Pages.169-173
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 3022-7666(pISSN)
  • /
  • 3022-8247(eISSN)
한국여성건강간호학회 (Korean Society of Women Health Nursing)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Gender issues in nursing research

  • Yun, Cheol-Heui (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.09.05
  • 심사 : 2022.09.19
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hu FB, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Prospective study of major dietary patterns and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(4):912-921. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.4.912
  2. Bjorklund P. Invisibility, moral knowledge and nursing work in the writings of Joan Liaschenko and Patricia Rodney. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11(2):110-121. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733004ne677oa
  3. Kelly UA. Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2009;32(2):E42-E56. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181a3b3fc
  4. Vuolanto P, Laiho A. The gender perspective in nursing research: a theoretical treasure chest or a 'thorn' in the side? Minerva. 2017;55:371-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9318-0
  5. Yi M, Yih BS. Feminism and qualitative nursing research. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004;34(3):565-575. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.3.565
  6. Scott PE, Unger EF, Jenkins MR, Southworth MR, McDowell TY, Geller RJ, et al. Participation of women in clinical trials supporting FDA approval of cardiovascular drugs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(18):1960-1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.070
  7. Peters SA, Woodward M. Sex and gender matter in cardiovascular disease and beyond. Heart. 2022;108(13):994-995. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320719
  8. Saxena A, Lasher E, Somerville C, Heidari S. Considerations of sex and gender dimensions by research ethics committees: a scoping review. Int Health. 2022 Jan 18 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihab093
  9. White J, Tannenbaum C, Klinge I, Schiebinger L, Clayton J. The integration of sex and gender considerations into biomedical research: lessons from international funding agencies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(10):3034-3048. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab434
  10. Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6
  11. Peters SA, Babor TF, Norton RN, Clayton JA, Ovseiko PV, Tannenbaum C, et al. Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(11):e007853. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007853