Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Priority Goals of Stakeholders for Smart City Projects: An Application of AHP Methodology

스마트시티 프로젝트 이해관계자 간의 목표 우선순위에 대한 연구: AHP 방법론의 적용을 중심으로

  • Received : 2022.08.12
  • Accepted : 2022.09.14
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For the smooth implementation and success of smart city projects, it is necessary to recognize that there is a difference in the perception of value judgments or strategic goals among major stakeholders in the planning process. And it is necessary to aim the values and goals of smart cities through reconciliation of these differences. The two major stakeholders in the smart city development project are citizens group and government officials group. Government officials are in charge of establishing and implementing policies for smart city projects, and their value judgments and perceptions influence the policy direction. In these respects, government officials can be an important stakeholder group. Citizens are a group that includes ordinary residents and business owners who live in smart cities and are the ultimate users of infrastructure and facilities. This study investigated the importance perceptions of citizens and government officials, who are the major stakeholders, about the core values and strategic goals that the smart city project aims. Responses were collected using a structured questionnaire to which the AHP methodology was applied. And the priority of perceptions for constituent items was compared for each stakeholder group. Through the comparative analysis results, it was empirically confirmed that there is a difference in the values and goals pursued by the smart city project between stakeholder groups. As an empirical study on the stakeholders of the smart city project, this study is meaningful in contributing to the theoretical development in that it suggests that the conceptual structural model of the smart city strategy system presented in previous studies can be applied in practice.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement(KAIA) grant funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (22DEAP-B158907-03).

References

  1. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., and De-Pablos-Heredero, C., A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities' ecosystems, Cities, 2017, Vol. 64, pp. 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.011
  2. Albino, V., Berardi, U., and Dangelico, R.M., Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, Journal of Urban Technology, 2015, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3-21.
  3. Amsterdam Smart City Website https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/network/amsterdam-smart-city.
  4. Aurigi, A., Competing urban visions and the shaping of the digital city. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 2005, Vol. 18, No. 1, 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-005-1013-z
  5. Angelidou, M., Smart city policies: A spatial approach, Cities, 2014, Vol. 41, pp. S3-S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
  6. Bakici, T., Almirall, E., and Wareham, J., A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 2, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
  7. Bhatta, B., Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Kolkata, India, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009, Vol. 30, No. 18, pp. 4733-4746. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802651967
  8. Bakici, T., Almirall, E., and Wareham, J., A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
  9. Bell, S., Benatti, F., Edwards, N.R., Laney, R., Morse, D.R., Piccolo, L., and Zanetti, O., Smart cities and M3: rapid research, meaningful metrics and co-design, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2018, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9415-x
  10. Busan Metropolitan City, Vision and Strategy of Busan Smart City, 2018.
  11. Capra, C.F., The Smart City and its citizens: Governance and citizen participation in Amsterdam Smart City, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 2016, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 20-38.
  12. Choi, M.J., Lee, S.H., Jo, S.S., Jung, Y.J., and Jo, S.W., The Living Lab Model of Smart City Based on Citizen Participation, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2020, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 284-294. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.04.284
  13. Cohen, B. and Amoros, J.E., Municipal demand-side policy tools and the strategic management of technology life cycles, Technovation, 2014, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 797-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.001
  14. Daegu Metropolitan City, Daegu Metropolitan City Smart City Plan, 2021.
  15. Daejeon Sejong Research Institute, Establishment of smart city model based on citizen participation, 2018.
  16. Dirks, S. and Keeling, M., A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future, IBM Institute for Business Value, 2009, Vol. 8.
  17. FG-SSC, I.T.U.T., ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities. In Workshop Report, 2014, Vol. 10, p. 2014.
  18. Global U-City Trends and Prospects, 2014.
  19. Graham, L.J., Van Bergen, P., and Sweller, N., To educate you to be smart': Disaffected students and the purpose of school in the (not so clever) lucky country, Journal of Education Policy, 2015, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.953596
  20. Giffinger, R. and Pichler-Milanovic, N., Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology, 2007.
  21. Gyonggi Research Institute, A Study of Smart city Strategy in the Era of 4th Industrial Revolution, Policy Research, 2018-77, 2018, pp. 1-235.
  22. Hamblen, M., Just what IS a smart city, Computerworld, 2015.
  23. Han, S.H., Shin, Y.S., Yu, I.J., and Lee, J.Y., A Study on the Korea Smart City Certification Index and Demonstration Authentication, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 2018, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 688-698. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.1.688
  24. Harrison, C. and Donnelly, I.A., A theory of smart cities, In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, Hull, UK, 2011.
  25. Heaton, J. and Parlikad, A.K., A conceptual framework for the alignment of infrastructure assets to citizen requirements within a Smart Cities framework, Cities, 2019, Vol. 90, pp. 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.041
  26. Hwang, S. and Shim, J.W., Semantic Network Analysis of "Smart City" in Newspaper Articles: From 2016 to 2019, Journal of Digital Contents Society, 2020, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 941-950. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.5.941
  27. Iannone, R., Gurashi, R., Iannuzzi, I., de Ghantuz Cubbe, G., and Sessa, M., Smart Society, A Sociological Perspective on Smart Living, 2019.
  28. Jang, H.Y., A Study on Priority Analysis for Activating the Convergence Smart City Service, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2017, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 152-161. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.08.152
  29. Jang, H.Y. and Kim, K., Business Issues and Countermeasures of Smart City Living Lab, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 2020, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 45-57. https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.23.1.4
  30. Jang, H.Y. and Kim, N.G., A Study on Smart City Governance and Collaboration Direction of Government Departments: Focus on MOLIT and MSIP, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2017, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 430-439. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.05.430
  31. Ju, Y.C., Lee, E., and Suh, W.J., An Analysis on the Smart City Research Trends, Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 2020, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 147-170.
  32. Jeff Frazier and Tom Touchet, Transforming the City of New York, Cisco IBSG, 2012.
  33. Jesep-Ramon Ferrer, Barcelona's Smart City vision: an opportunity for transformation. Institut Veolia, 2017.
  34. Kang, H., An Analysis on the Importance of Evaluation Factors of Lifelong Education Institutions in Autonomous Municipal Government using AHP, The Journal of Yeolin Education, 2018, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 27-47.
  35. Kang, H., Kim, S.C., Chang, M.K., Lee, T., and Lee, A., Examining the Strategic Priorities for Smart City Project with Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on a Survey of Potential Residents, Journal of Digital Convergence, 2021, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 243-253. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.12.243
  36. Kang, M.G., Smart City-Concept and Meaning, World and Cities, 2015, Vol. 9, pp. 20-27.
  37. Kim, C.G., A Priority Analysis on Corporate Resource Allocation through Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP), Journal of Regional Studies and Development, 2008, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 109-125.
  38. Kim, D.H., Jung, Y.J., and Joh, W.I., A Study on the Characteristics of Consumers' Choice of Cosmetics in Online Shops Using AHP, Management Education Studies, 2018, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 387-406.
  39. Kim, D.H. and Hyun, J.K., Development of Performance Indices for Agro-food Distribution Corporations Based on the AHP Method, Journal of Distribution Science, 2017, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 95-102. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.15.12.201712.95
  40. Kwak, J. and Hwang, C., A Study on the Effects of Quality of u-City Service on Customer Satisfaction in the Korea: Focusing on Public Services, The Journal of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 9, pp. 1351-1358. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2013.8.9.1351
  41. Kim, K.B., Kim, G.C., and Cho, H.J., Status and Prospect of Smart City in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 2018, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 191-197. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.9.191
  42. Kim, S.R. and Lee, Y.H., Policy and Legislative Studies on Smart City Construction, Law Review, 2019, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 163-202.
  43. Lee, C.H. and Sun, I.S., A Study on the Derivation of Urban Logistics System Technology Development Priorities in Smart Cities, Korean Review of Corporation Management, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 45-55.
  44. Lee, M.S., Internet of Things (IoT)-based Smart City Demonstration Service Main Status and Cases, The Proceeding of the KITC, 2017, Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 3-8.
  45. Lee, S.K. and Lee, J.S., A Study of the Causal Connections between Residents' Satisfaction and Loyalty to u-City Projects through Their Living and Economic Benefit Expectations, Seoul Studies, 2011, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 87-104. https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.12.2.201106.87
  46. Lee, S.O., Bae, D.H., and Kim, S., A Critical Study on Smart City Governance: The Case of China's Smart City Policies, Space and Environment, 2020, Vol. 70, pp. 271-322.
  47. Lee, S.H. and Lim, Y.T., Analyzing Characteristics of the Smart City Governance, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 2016, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 86-97. https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2016.19.2.086
  48. Lee, J.Y. and Han, S.H., An Investigation of a Smart City Policy Change and Local Government Response, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 2019, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 1-11.
  49. Lee, Y.G. and Lee, J.S., Analytical Approach on Resident's Satisfactions of u-City Public Service: With special references to Dong-tan dong, GRI Review, 2009, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 91-111.
  50. Martin, C.J., Evans, J., and Karvonen, A., Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, Vol. 133, pp. 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
  51. Monzon, A., Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects. In 2015 international conference on smart cities and green ICT systems (SMARTGREENS), 2015, (pp. 1-11), IEEE.
  52. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong Smart City National Demonstration City Implementation Plan, 2019.
  53. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, The 3rd Smart City Master Plan: 2019~2023, 2019.
  54. Moon, S.H., Big Data Platform Construction and Application for Smart City Development, The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 2020, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 529-534. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.2.529
  55. Nam, K.W., Park, J.W., Park, J.H., and Ji, S.T., The Organizational Structure and Role of Smart City Governance, Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, 2017, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 69-85. https://doi.org/10.22669/KRSA.2017.33.1.069
  56. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C., Mangano, G., and Scorrano, F., Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts, Cities, 2014, Vol. 38, pp. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010
  57. New York NYCEDC. https://edc.nyc/industry/smart-cities/.
  58. Offenhuber, D. and Schechtner, K., Improstructure-an improvisational perspective on smart infrastructure governance, Cities, 2018, Vol. 72, pp. 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.017
  59. Paroutis, S., Bennett, M., and Heracleous, L., A strategic view on smart city technology: The case of IBM Smarter Cities during a recession, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, Vol. 89, pp. 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041
  60. Park, C.H. and Lee, S., The Comparative Analysis of the Reasons for Decreases in Marin Fishery Resources Based on AHP & Cluster Analysis, The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 2009, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 127-146
  61. Park, K.J., A Study on the Smart City Selection through the Evaluation of 7 Layers of Smart City, Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 2019, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 691-699. https://doi.org/10.35873/AJMAHS.2019.9.6.067
  62. Park, J.T., Cheon, S.M., and Go, S.J., IoT-based healthcare service and platform trends, Information and Communications Magazine, 2014, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 25-30.
  63. Park, Y.S., Decision-making theory and practice by AHP. SEOUL: Kyowoosa, 2009.
  64. Park, Y.K. and Rue, S.M., Analysis on Smart City Service Technology with IoT, Korean Institute of Information Technology Magazine, 2015, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 31-37.
  65. Partridge, H.L., Developing a human perspective to the digital divide in the 'smart city', In Australian Library and Information Association Biennial Conference, 2004.
  66. Picon, A., Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence, John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  67. Popescu, G.H., The economic value of smart city technology, Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 2015, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 76-82.
  68. Ryu, I.C. and Choi, Y.S., A Location Selection of Logistics Center for Environment-Friendly Agricultural Products in the Gwangyang Bay Area, Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 2011, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 1-26.
  69. Ryu, S.Y. and Lee, J.W., A Governance Approach for the Sustainable Smart City, Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association, 2019, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 81-96. https://doi.org/10.36700/KRUMA.2019.09.32.3.81
  70. Saaty, T.L., The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource allocation. RWS publications, USA, 1980.
  71. Saaty, T.L., Group decision making and the AHP. In The analytic hierarchy process (pp. 59-67). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989.
  72. Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  73. Siheung City, Sihung Smart City Plan: 2020-2024, 2019.
  74. Smart City Korea, Busan Eco-Delta Smart City Master Plan, 2018.
  75. Snow, C.C., Hakonsson, D.D., and Obel, B., A Smart City Is a Collaborative Community: Lessons from Smart Aarhus, California Management Review, 2016, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 92-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125616683954
  76. Song, G. and Wu, L., Smart city in perspective of innovation 2.0, Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2012, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 1-8.
  77. Song, K.W. and Lee, Y., Re-scaling for Improving the Consistency of the AHP Method, Social Science Research Review, 2013, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 271-288.
  78. Vargas, L.G., An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  79. Vienna Municipal Administration, Smart City Wien Framework Strategy 2019-2050, 2019.
  80. Wray, A., Olstad, D.L., and Minaker, L.M., Smart prevention: A new approach to primary and secondary cancer prevention in smart and connected communities, Cities, 2018, Vol. 79, pp. 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.022
  81. Yigitcanlar, T., Kankanamge, N., and Vella, K., How are smart city concepts and technologies perceived and utilized? A systematic geo-Twitter analysis of smart cities in Australia, Journal of Urban Technology, 2021, Vol. 28, No. 1-2, pp. 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1753483
  82. Yovanof, G.S. and Hazapis, G.N., An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments, Wireless Personal Communications, 2009, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9693-4
  83. Zhao, F., Fashola, O.I., Olarewaju, T.I., and Onwumere, I., Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review, Cities, 2021, Vol. 119, p. 103406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103406