한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

레코드 컨티뉴엄의 기록 평가 논리 분석 - 라이프사이클과의 비교를 통한 핵심 요소 도출 -

A Study of Appraisal in Record Continuum Theory: Derivation of Key Elements through the Comparison with Appraisal in Life Cycle Model

  • 김명훈 (국립강릉원주대학교 인문사회)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.23
  • 심사 : 2022.09.05
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본고에서는 레코드 컨티뉴엄에서의 평가 논리를 분석하였다. 전자기록 환경에서의 평가가 지닌 보다 근원적인 함의를 파악하기 위해서는 레코드 컨티뉴엄에 내재되어 있는 평가 논리에 대한 분석이 필수적으로 요구된다. 레코드 컨티뉴엄은 기존의 라이프사이클을 기반으로 한 평가 논리 및 여기서 연유한 양분화된 기록관리체제에 대한 반론에서 출발한 이론체계라는 점에서, 전자기록 환경에서의 평가에 관한 이론적 기반을 제공해 줄 수 있다. 특히 평가는 기록이 지닌 의미를 모색하는 합목적적 행위임을 감안할 때, 레코드 컨티뉴엄에서 의도한 기록의 개념 및 의미에 대한 재해석은 이전과는 다른 평가상의 논리들을 도출할 수 있게 해준다. 이에 본고에서는 라이프사이클 평가 논리와의 비교 및 레코드 컨티뉴엄에서 제시한 새로운 기록에 대한 인식을 기반으로, 레코드 컨티뉴엄 평가 논리상의 핵심 요소를 세 가지 측면에 초점을 맞추어 분석하였다.

In this study, the appraisal in record continuum theory is analyzed in conjunction with the appraisal in life cycle model. In order to understand the more fundamental implications of appraisal in electronic record environment, it is essential to analyze the appraisal inherent in record continuum theory. Record continuum theory can provide a theoretical basis for appraisal in electronic record environment in that it is a theoretical system in opposition of the appraisal based on life cycle model and dualistic records management system resulting from it. In particular, considering that the appraisal is a purposive act of seeking the meaning of records, the reinterpretation of the concept and meaning of records intended in record continuum theory enables us to derive the different appraisal logics than before. Therefore In this study, based on comparison with the appraisal based on life cycle model and the new record concept presented in record continuum, the appraisal in record continuum theory is analyzed focusing on three aspects.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A5B5A16082244).

참고문헌

  1. Kim, Myoung-Hun (2009). Appraisal of Electronic Records. Seoul: Jinlitamgu.
  2. Kim, Myoung-Hun (2010). Records continuum, appraisal and archival contents: building the concept of archival contents. Journal of Information Management, 41(3), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.3.131
  3. Kim, Myoung-Hun (2021a). A study on the origin of record continuum theory: focusing on the comparison with record lifecycle model. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 68, 5-39. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.68.005
  4. Kim, Myoung-Hun (2021b). Significance and limitations of record continuum in electronic record environment: focusing on meaning and nature of records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives & Records Management, 21(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.3.001
  5. Lee, Seung-Eok (2001). The prospect of 'Recordkeeping Regime' in the public sector of Korea: examination on the characteristics of the tables of transactions for records scheduling by PRA act. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 4, 31-62. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2001.4.031
  6. Seol, Moon-Won & Lee, Seung-Eok (2021). Transforming archival appraisal in digital environments. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 67, 57-97. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.67.057
  7. Schellenberg, Theodore R. (1956). Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. 이원영 옮김(2002). 현대 기록학개론. 서울: 진리탐구.
  8. Schellenberg, Theodore R. (1956) The Appraisal of Modern Public Records. 오항녕 옮김 (2005). 현대 공공기록의 평가. 기록학의 평가론. 서울: 진리탐구.
  9. Angel, H. (1968). Archival Janus: The Records Center. American Archivist, 31(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.31.1.0214072667548u15
  10. Atherton, J. (1985). From life cycle to continuum: some thoughts on the records management-archives relationship. Archivaria, 21, 43-51.
  11. Bantin, P. C. (1998). Strategies for managing electronic records: a new archival paradigm? an affirmation of our archival traditions?. Archival Issues, 23(1), 17-34.
  12. Bearman, D. (1994). Electronic Evidence: Strategies for Managing Records in Contemporary Organizations. Pittsburgh: Archives & Museum Information.
  13. Bearman, D. (1995). Archival strategies. American Archivists, 58(4), 380-413. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.58.4.pq71240520j31798
  14. Bettington, J. (2004). Standardised recordkeeping: reality or illusion?. Archives & Manuscripts, 32(2), 46-69.
  15. Brooks, P. C. (1940). The selection of records for preservation. American Archivist, 3(4), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.3.4.u77415458gu22n65
  16. Brothman, B. (2001). The past that archives keep: memory, history, and the preservation of archival records. Archivaria, 51, 48-80.
  17. Cox, R. J. (2010). Appraisal and the Future of Archives in the Digital Era, The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping, Hill, Jennie ed., London: Facet Publishing.
  18. Dan, K. (2002). Acquisition, Appraisal and International Standard ISO 15489. Comma, 2002(1-2), 71-74.
  19. Dingwall, G. (2010). Life Cycle and Continuum: A View of Recordkeeping Models from the Postwar Era. Currents of Archival Thinking. Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather eds. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unilimited.
  20. Duranti, L. (1989). The odyssey of records management. part ii: from the middle ages to modern times. Records Management Quarterly, 23(October), 3-11.
  21. Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  22. Evans, F. B. (1967). Archivists and records managers: variations on a theme. American Archivist, 30(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.30.1.61531w0h80746748
  23. Flynn, S. J. A. (2001). The records continuum model in context and its implications for archival practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037522
  24. Gasiorowski-Denis, E. (2016). Records Management in the Digital Age. Available: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref2072.
  25. Gracy II, D. B. (1987). Is there a future in the use of archives?. Archivaria, 24, 3-9.
  26. Grover, C. (1951). Recent developments in federal archival activities. American Archivist, 14(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.14.1.36g4k56w5302u106
  27. Hammitt, J. J. (1965). Government archivists and records management. American Archivist, 28(2), 219-222. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.28.2.2824763xmrl2741w
  28. Hare, C. E. (1998). Records management in the next millennium: conference report. Records Management Journal, 8(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007234
  29. Harris, V. (2005). Recordkeeping and records continuum thinkers: examining a seminal Australian text. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(2), 160-170.
  30. Hartland, R., McKemmish, S., & Upward, F. (2005). Documents. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  31. Henry, L. J. (1998). Schellenberg in cyberspace. American Archivist, 61(2), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.61.2.f493110467x38701
  32. Hofman, H. (2005). Archive. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  33. Holmes, O. W. (1949). The national archives at a turn in the road. American Archivist, 12(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.12.4.9515876g341h8864
  34. Hurley, C. (1998). The making and keeping of records(1): what are finding aids for?. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 58-77.
  35. Lane, V. & Hill, J. (2011). Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? Situating The Archive and Archivists. The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Hill, J. ed. London: Facet Publishing.
  36. Lybeck, J. (2000). Appraisal 2000: A Project of the Finnish National Archives and Its International Context. Principles of Appraisal and Their Application in Electronic Enviroment - European Models and Concepts: Proceedings of the DLM-Experts' Meeting in Tampere, Finland, November 11-12, 1999. Valtionarkisto: National Archives of Finland.
  37. Maclean, I. (1956). Trends in organising modern public records with special reference to classification needs. Archives & Manuscripts, 1(3), 1-17.
  38. McKemmish, S. (1994). Are Records Ever Actual?. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. McKemmish, S., Piggott, M. eds. Clayton: Ancora Press & Australian Archives.
  39. McKemmish, S. (1996). Evidence of Me. The Australian Library Journal, 45(3), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1996.10755757
  40. McKemmish, S. (1997). Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility. Proceedings of the Records Management Association of Australia 14th National Convention, 15-17 September 1997. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/conference_contribution/Yesterday_today_and_tomorrow_a_continuum_of_responsibility/4037433
  41. McKemmish, S. (1998). The Smoking Gun: Recordkeeping and Accountability. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/conference_contribution/The_smoking_gun_recordkeeping_and_accountability/4037394
  42. McKemmish, S. (2001). Placing records continuum theory and practice. Archival Science, 1(4), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438901
  43. McKemmish, S. (2017). Recordkeeping in the Continuum: An Australian Tradition. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Gilliland, A. J., McKemmish, S. & Lau, A. J. eds. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.
  44. McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Ward, N., & Reed, B. (1999). Describing records in context in the continuum: the Australian recordkeeping metadata schema. Archivaria, 48, 3-37.
  45. McKemmish, S., Reed, B., & Piggott, M. (2005). Archives. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  46. McLeod, J. (1996). The record's lifecycle: myth, mantra or misnomer. Records Management Journal, 6(1), 5-12.
  47. Menne-Haritz, A. (2000). Appraisal and Disposal of Electronic Records and the Principle of Provenance: Appraisal for Access-Not for Oblivion. Principles of Appraisal and Their Application in Electronic Environment - European Models and Concepts: Proceedings of the DLM-Experts' Meeting in Tampere, Finland, November 11-12, 1999. Valtionarkisto: National Archives of Finland.
  48. Nesmith, T. (2008). Re-exploring the continuum, rediscovering archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 36(2), 34-53.
  49. Palmer, M. (2000). Records management and accountability vs. corruption, fraud and maladministration. Records Management Journal, 10(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007256
  50. Piggott, M. (1998). The history of Australian record-keeping: a framework for research. The Australian Library Journal, 47(4), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1998.10755861
  51. Piggott, M. (2005). Building collective memory archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 62-83.
  52. Reed, B. (2005a). Reading the records continuum: interpretations and explorations. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 18-43.
  53. Reed, B. (2005b). Records. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  54. SAA (2005). Dictionary of Archives Terminology. Available: https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/appraisal.html
  55. Stuckey, S. (1994). Keepers of the Fame? The Custodial Role of Australian Archives?Its History and Its Future. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. McKemmish, S., Piggott, M.l eds. Clayton, Vic.: Ancora in association with Australian Archives.
  56. Upward, F. (1994). In Search of the Continuum: Ian Maclean's 'Australian Experience' Essays on Recordkeeping. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/In_search_of_the_continuum_Ian_Maclean_s_Australian_Experience_Essays_on_Recordkeeping/4060014
  57. Upward, F. (1996). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial Principles and Properties. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/Structuring_the_records_continuum_-_part_one_postcustodial_principles_and_properties/4037445/1
  58. Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond - a personal reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259
  59. Wickman, D. (1999). What's new? functional analysis in life cycle and continuum environments. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 114-127.