International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

e-teaching portfolio development : Scoping Review

  • Kim, Jungae (Department of Nursing, Chodang University) ;
  • Kim, Milang (Department of International studies, Chodang University)
  • Received : 2022.08.02
  • Accepted : 2022.09.06
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop an e-teaching portfolio to perform a teaching portfolio of an instructor on the web. I order to carry out this study, an initial model of the e-teaching portfolio was developed through systematic literature review, and the final e-teaching portfolio was developed by selecting and applying five students, then modifying and supplementing them. The study period was from May 1 to May 20, 2022. As a result of the study, the components of the finally developed e-teaching portfolio are Step 1: Understanding oneself, Step 2: Goal setting, Step 3: Learning strategy, Step 4: Self-check. In conclusion, the program developed through this study is a convenient function that can process everything in one place by connecting the fragmented teaching results, and the developed e-teaching portfolio can promote interaction between individuals by building a community. It has possible characteristics. In order to systematically activate the e-teaching portfolio developed through this study, it is necessary to establish an online management system for systematic operation. Furthermore, an institutional device is needed to guarantee the result of the developed e-teaching portfolio. In order to continuously manage the quality of the teaching portfolio, extrinsic rewards that stimulate the instructor's intrinsic motivation should be provided.

Keywords

References

  1. YH Lee, SC Kim, Diagnosis of higher education based on public interest and suggestions for future directions: Focusing on expert group interview (FGI) analysis, Education and Culture Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 37-70, 2020, https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2020.26.1.37).
  2. http://www.efoliominnesota.com
  3. YG Cho, EH Lee, Understanding and Practice of Learning Portfolio, Seoul: Hakjisa, 2013.
  4. YG Cho, EH Lee, MJ Sim, Understanding and Practice of Teaching Portfolio, Seoul: Hakjisa, 2011.
  5. Seldin, p., Miller, J. E, C. A., & McKeachie, W., The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions(4th ed.), John Wiley & sons, Inc, 2010.
  6. Wolf, K. P., The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in design, implementation and education, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 73, pp. 129-136, 1991.
  7. Doolittel, Teacher portfolio assessment, ERIC Document, ED385608, 1994.
  8. Zubizarreta, J., Teaching portfolios and the beginning teacher, Phi. Delta Kappan, Vol. 76, pp. 323-326, 1994.
  9. Bailey, K. M., Curtis A., & Nunan, D., Pursuing professional development: The self as source, London: Newbury House, 2001.
  10. Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  11. S.Y. Kim, J.E. Park, H.J. Seo, H.S. Seo, H.J. Son, C.M. Shin, Y.J. Lee, B.H. Jang, and D.S. Heo, NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Vol. 8, pp. 1-287, 2011.
  12. https://teaching.berkeley.edu/resources/assessment-and-evaluation/design-assessment/e-portfolio.
  13. Guzeller, Cem Oktay, The effect of web-based portfolio use on academic achievement and retention, Asia Pacific education review, Vol.13 No.3, pp.457-464, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-012-9214-0