DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Regulation on Recruitment Advertising for Clinical Trial Subjects in Korea

임상시험 대상자 모집 광고에 대한 정부의 규제 효과

  • 김현진 (차의과학대학교 일산차병원) ;
  • 손현순 (차의과학대학교 약학대학)
  • Received : 2022.06.15
  • Accepted : 2022.07.22
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Background: Recently clinical trials have expanded extensively in Korea; thus, ensuring the rights of subjects participating in clinical trials is imperative. Accordingly, national regulations on subject recruitment advertisement were enforced from October 25, 2018. In this study, the effect of this regulation was evaluated by analyzing the difference in the provision of information before and after enforcement of the regulation. Methods: Recruitment advertisements for clinical trial subjects 3 years before and after enforcement of the regulation were collated by the significance sampling approach. Print-based (newspapers, buses, and subways) and web-based (clinical trial center websites and online platforms) materials for recruitment in clinical trials of phase 1 to 4 for investigational drugs, medical devices, and oriental medicine were considered. Chi-square tests were conducted for inter-group comparisons. SPSS version 26 was employed for statistical analyses. Results: A total of 137 advertisements were collected comprising 60 pre- and 77 post-regulation enforcement. The overall rate of delivery of critical information in advertisements increased significantly from 47.5% before regulation to 93.2% after regulation enforcement. Particularly, details on expected adverse events augmented significantly (p<0.001). Benefits from participation in clinical trial reduced significantly from 88.3% to 70.1% (p<0.05). As the information provision amplified, the inclusion of professional terms increased. Conclusions: Enforcement of regulations has led to a surge in the amount of information and challenging terms contained in advertisements for recruiting subjects. Therefore, additional efforts are required by subjects to completely understand the information provided in the advertisements.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean National Enterprise for Clinical Trials. Public perception survey of COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial. Available from https://www.konect.or.kr/kr/board/press/boardView.do?bbsIdx=2965&pageIndex=4&searchCondition=all&searchKeyword=. Accessed May 05, 2022.
  2. Fairbanks E, Shah S, Wilde MH, McDonald MV, Brasch J, McMahon JM. Successful recruitment methods in the community for a two-site clinical trial. Appl Nurs Res 2014;27(4):254-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.04.002
  3. Frank G. Current challenges in clinical trial patient recruitment and enrollment. SOCRA Source. 2004; 2(February):30-38. Available from https://clinicaltrials.llu.edu/sites/clinicaltrials.llu.edu/files/docs/current-challenges-in-clinical-trial-patient-recruitment-andenrollment.pdf. Accessed March 01, 2022.
  4. Kadam RA, Borde SU, Madas SA, Salvi SS, Limaye SS. Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects. Perspect Clin Res 2016;7(3):137-43. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.184820
  5. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 2006;7(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-1
  6. Nathan RA. How important is patient recruitment in performing clinical trials? J Asthma 1999;36(3):213-16. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770909909075405
  7. Emanuel EJ, Crouch RA, Arras JD. Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research: readings and commentary, 1st ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004:1-12.
  8. Wang B, Cao Y, Li C, Wei S, Chen X. Analysis of the status of subject recruitment in clinical trials in Shandong, China. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012;7(1):9-16. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.9
  9. Kim WO. Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012;62(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3
  10. Paul J, Seib R, Prescott T. The Internet and clinical trials: background, online resources, examples and issues. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(1):e5. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e5
  11. Department of Health and Human Services, office of inspector general. Clinical trial web site. Available from https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:fV8oyC7_UFIJ:https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00198.pdf+&cd=2&hl=ko&ct=clnk&gl=kr. Accessed May 02, 2022.
  12. U.S Department of Health & Human Services. Guidance on institutional review board review of clinical trial website. clinical trial websites : When is IRB review required and what should IRBs consider with reviewing. 2005. Available from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/clinical-trial-websites/index.html. Accessed March 06, 2022.
  13. U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA). Recruiting study subjects. 1998. Available from https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/search-fda-guidance-documents/recruiting-studysubjects. Accessed February 25, 2022.
  14. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Status of approval of clinical trials in 2021. Available from https://nedrug.mfds.go.kr/bbs/119/245. Accessed February 26, 2022.
  15. Rapportian. Clinical trial 'part-timer' is an incorrect expression… 'volunteer' is correct. Available from https://www.rapportian.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=138099. Accessed January 12, 2022.
  16. Sisa Journal. Part-time Maruta accused of still making money in clinical trials. Available from http://www.sisajournal.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=145732. Accessed January 12, 2022.
  17. Today newspaper. Do you still look like a part of honey? Contrast of clinical and viability tests. Available from http://www.ntoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=36730. Accessed January 12, 2022.
  18. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Article 34 Paragraphs 3 of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act. Available from https://www.moleg.go.kr/index.es?sid=a1. Accessed March 26, 2022.
  19. Kim HJ, Han HS, Sohn HS. Assessment and analysis of recruitment resources for clinical trial subjects in Korea. J Kor Soc Health-syst Pharm 2022;39(2):202-18. https://doi.org/10.32429/jkshp.2022.39.2.006
  20. Ministry Of Food And Drug Safety. Uiyagpum-anjeonnara. Available from https://nedrug.mfds.go.kr/index. Accessed July 04, 2022.
  21. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Article 24 Paragraph 2 of the rules on the safety of medicines. Available from https://www.moleg.go.kr/index.es?sid=a1. Accessed July 04, 2022.
  22. Klitzman R, Albala I, Siragusa J, Patel J, Appelbaum PS. Disclosure of information to potential subjects on research recruitment web sites. IRB 2008;30(1):15-20.
  23. Bohaychuk W, Ball G. Conducting GCP-compliant clinical research. 1st ed. England: Wiley, 1999:1-6.
  24. Bohaychuk W, Ball G, Lawrence G, Sotirov K. A quantitative view of international GCP compliance. Appl Clin Trials 1998;7(2):24-9.
  25. Brunier DP, Nahler GR. GCP deficiencies in clinical trials in western and eastern Europe: results of international clinical trial center audits. Appl Clin Trials 1998;7(3):46-51.
  26. Bernstein SL, Feldman J. Incentives to participate in clinical trials: practical and ethical considerations. Am J Emerg Med 2015;33(9):1197-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.020
  27. Brown JG. Recruiting human subjects: pressures in industrysponsored clinical research. 1st ed. Boston: DIANE Publishing, 2008:1-9.
  28. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000;283(20):2701-11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
  29. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc 2009;107(6):403-5.
  30. Silverman H. Protecting vulnerable research subjects in critical care trials: enhancing the informed consent process and recommendations for safeguards. Ann Intensive Care 2011;1(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-8
  31. Ministry Of Food And Drug Safety. Notice regarding recruitment of clinical trial subjects. Available from http://kscd.kr/web/board/safetyNewsView.do?boardIdx=252. Accessed May 04, 2022.
  32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Recommendation on improving the quality of government regulation. 1995. Available from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments?mode=advanced&reference=C(95)21~2FFINAL. Accessed May 12, 2022.
  33. Padhy BM, Gupta P, Gupta Y K. Analysis of the compliance of informed consent documents with good clinical practice guideline. Contemp Clin Trials 2011;32(5):662-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.016
  34. Pitler E, Nenkova A. Revisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality. In: Proceedings of the 2008 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Honolulu, October 2008:186-95.
  35. Kang T, Elhadad N, Weng C. Initial readability assessment of clinical trial eligibility criteria. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2015;2015:687-96.