DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessing the potential invasiveness of transgenic plants in South Korea: a three-year case study on sunflowers

  • Han, Sung Min (Division of Ecological Safety, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Nam, Kyong-Hee (Division of Ecological Safety, National Institute of Ecology)
  • Received : 2022.05.23
  • Accepted : 2022.07.01
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Background: The introduction of new living modified (LM) crops may pose a latent threat to the biodiversity of each country. Here, we used sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) as a study system to investigate the potential for invasiveness of LM crops under different environmental conditions when released into a natural ecosystem in South Korea. We examined the seed germination, survival, and flowering of sunflowers under competition with wild plants at different sowing dates (March-December) and plot sizes (1 m × 1 m and 2 m × 2 m). Results: The germination rate showed a significant difference according to the sowing date. In addition, several sunflowers survived in plots with a high germination rate, which also led to a higher flowering rate. We found that the smaller the plot, the smaller the area available for inter-species competition, and the higher the number of surviving sunflower plants. The relative dominance and importance value of the species varied significantly between the sowing dates; in particular, sunflowers sown in March could compete with wild plants for longer than those sown on other sowing dates. Conclusions: These observations indicate that the potential for invasiveness of sunflowers differs depending on the environmental conditions and seed density at the time of release.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Jung-Hyo Lee and Dr. Jeong-Soo Park at National Institute of Ecology for identifying wild plant species.

References

  1. Adhikari P, Jeon JY, Kim HW, Shin MS, Adhikari P, Seo C. Potential impact of climate change on plant invasion in the Republic of Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2019;43:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0134-3.
  2. Albuquerque MCD, de Carvalho NM. Effect of the type of environmental stress on the emergence of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) and maize (Zea mays L.) seeds with different levels of vigor. Seed Sci Technol. 2003;31(2):465-79. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2003.31.2.23.
  3. Bailleul D, Ollier S, Huet S, Gardarin A, Lecomte J. Seed spillage from grain trailers on road verges during oilseed rape harvest: an experimental survey. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032752.
  4. Boskovic J, Zuza M. Impact of genetically modified plants on the environment. J Agron Technol Eng Manag. 2019;2(4):294-311.
  5. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie. 3rd ed. Wien: Springer; 1964.
  6. Cantamutto M, Poverene M. Genetically modified sunflower release: opportunities and risks. Field Crops Res. 2007;101(2):133-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.11.007.
  7. Casquero M, Presotto A, Cantamutto M. Exoferality in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): a case study of intraspecific/interbiotype interference promoted by human activity. Field Crops Res. 2013;142:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.022.
  8. Celis-Diez JL, Bustamante RO, Vasquez RA. Assessing frequency-dependent seed size selection: a field experiment. Biol J Linn Soc. 2004;81(2):307-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00287.x.
  9. da Silva Alcantara LM, Lisboa LAM, Storti SMM, da Silva Lima AE, de Olibveira Crispim NP, da Silva GG, et al. Initial development of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under weed competition with different species of grasses. J Exp Agric Int. 2018;29(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/JEAI/2019/45613.
  10. Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EM. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(6):567-74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0602-567. Erratum in: Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(8):843.
  11. Ebrahimian E, Seyyedi SM, Bybordi A, Damalas CA. Seed yield and oil quality of sunflower, safflower, and sesame under different levels of irrigation water availability. Agric Water Manag. 2019;218:149-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.031.
  12. EFSA. Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA J. 2006;99:1-100.
  13. Elezovic I, Datta A, Vrbnicanin S, Glamoclija D, Simic M, Malidza G, et al. Yield and yield components of imidazolinone-resistant sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) are influenced by pre-emergence herbicide and time of post-emergence weed removal. Field Crops Res. 2012;128:137-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.020.
  14. Gao F, Ayele BT. Functional genomics of seed dormancy in wheat: advances and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00458.
  15. Gay C, Corbineau F, Come D. Effects of temperature and oxygen on seed germination and seedling growth in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ Exp Bot. 1991;31(2):193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(91)90070-5.
  16. Ghosh K, Jepson PC. Genetically modified organisms in crop production and their effects on the environment: methodologies for monitoring and the way ahead. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2006.
  17. Han SM, Oh T, Uddin MR, Shinogi Y, Lee B, Kim C, et al. Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified maize in Korea: a 3-year observations. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ. 2015;60(2):285-90. https://doi.org/10.5109/1526339.
  18. Hong SH, Lee YH, Lee G, Lee DH, Adhikari P. Predicting impacts of climate change on northward range expansion of invasive weeds in South Korea. Plants (Basel). 2021;10(8):1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081604.
  19. ISAAA. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2019: biotech crops drive socio-economic development and sustainable environment in the new frontier. ISAAA Brief No. 55. Ithaca: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications; 2019.
  20. Katsuta K, Matsuo K, Yoshimura Y, Ohsawa R. Long-term monitoring of feral genetically modified herbicide-tolerant Brassica napus populations around unloading Japanese ports. Breed Sci. 2015;65(3):265-75. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.65.265.
  21. Kaur S, Kaur R, Chauhan BS. Understanding crop-weed-fertilizer-water interactions and their implications for weed management in agricultural systems. Crop Prot. 2018;103:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.09.011.
  22. KBCH. Biosafety Vol. 18 No. 2. Daejeon: Korea Biosafety Clearing House; 2017a.
  23. KBCH. Biosafety Vol. 18 No. 3. Daejeon: Korea Biosafety Clearing House; 2017b.
  24. KBCH. Import and Export Status. 2022. https://www.biosafety.or.kr/portal/page/f_03. Accessed 20 Jan 2022.
  25. Khalifa FM, Schneiter AA, El Tayeb EI. Temperature-germination responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes. Helia. 2000;23(33):97-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/helia.2000.23.33.97.
  26. Kim CG, Yi H, Park S, Yeon JE, Kim DY, Kim DI, et al. Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified soybean and maize around cultivated fields and at a grain receiving port in Korea. J Plant Biol. 2006;49:218-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030536.
  27. KMA. Korean climate change assessment report 2020: the physical science basis. Seoul: Korea Meteorological Administration; 2020.
  28. KMA. Synoptic Weather Observation, Statistics by Condition. 2022. https://data.kma.go.kr. Accessed 20 Jan 2022.
  29. Lim HS, Kim IR, Lee S, Choi W, Yoon AM, Lee JR. Establishment and application of a monitoring strategy for living modified cotton in natural environments in South Korea. Appl Sci. 2021;11(21):10259. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110259.
  30. Loose LH, Heldwein AB, Lucas DDP, Hinnah FD, Bortoluzzi MP. Sunflower emergence and initial growth in soil with water excess. Eng Agric. 2017;37(4):644-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v37n4p644-655/2017.
  31. Meffin R, Duncan RP, Hulme PE. Landscape-level persistence and distribution of alien feral crops linked to seed transport. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2015;203:119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.024.
  32. Munir MA, Malik MA, Yaseen M. Performance of sunflower in response to nitrogen management at different stages. Pak J Agric Sci. 2007;44(1):12-5.
  33. Nam KH, Han SM, Lee JR, Park JH, Choi W, Jung YJ, et al. Establishment of LMO risk assessment system and operation of the institute of LMO risk assessment under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment. Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology; 2019.
  34. Nam KH, Han SM. Seed germination of sunflower as a case study for the risk assessment and management of transgenic plants used for environmental remediation in South Korea. Sustainability. 2020;12(23):10110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310110.
  35. NIAST. Methods of soil and plant analysis. Suwon: National Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Technology; 2000.
  36. NIBR. National species list of Korea. Incheon: National Institute of Biological Resources; 2020.
  37. Park KW, Lee B, Kim C, Kim DY, Park J, Ko E, et al. Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified maize at a grain receiving port and along transportation routes in the Republic of Korea. Food Control. 2010;21(4):456-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.07.006.
  38. Pilson D, Prendeville HR. Ecological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2004;35:149-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132406
  39. Pilson D, Snow A, Rieseberg L, Alexander H. Fitness and population effects of gene flow from transgenic sunflower to wild Helianthus annuus. Paper presented at: Scientific Methods Workshop: Ecological and Agronomic Consequences of Gene Flow from Transgenic Crops to Wild Relatives; 2002 Mar 5-6; Columbus, USA. Columbus: Ohio State University, 2002. p. 58-70.
  40. Raunkiaer C. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1934.
  41. Raybould A, Higgins LS, Horak MJ, Layton RJ, Storer NP, De La Fuente JM, et al. Assessing the ecological risks from the persistence and spread of feral populations of insect-resistant transgenic maize. Transgenic Res. 2012;21(3):655-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9560-4.
  42. Raybould A. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops. Environ Biosafety Res. 2010;9(3):123-33. https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2011101.
  43. Sardana V, Mahajan G, Jabran K, Chauhan BS. Role of competition in managing weeds: an introduction to the special issue. Crop Prot. 2017;95:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.011.
  44. Schneiter AA, Miller JF. Description of sunflower growth stages 1. Crop Sci. 1981;21(6):901-3. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060024x.
  45. Shine C, Williams N, Gundling L. A guide to designing legal and institutional frameworks for alien invasive species. Gland: IUCN; 2000.
  46. Simpson GM. Seed dormancy in grasses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
  47. Snow AA, Palma PM. Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience. 1997;47(2):86-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313019.
  48. Stewart CN, Halfhill MD, Warwick SI. Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4(10):806-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1179. Erratum in: Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(4):310.
  49. Tonev T, Kalinova S, Yanev M, Mitkov A, Neshev N. Weed association dynamics in the sunflower fields. Sci Papers Ser A Agron. 2020;63(1):586-93.
  50. USDA-APHIS. USDA-APHIS biotechnology regulatory services user guide: notification. Riverdale: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); 2011.
  51. Warwick SI, Beckie HJ, Hall LM. Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1168:72-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04576.x.
  52. Watkinson AR, Freckleton RP, Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ. Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science. 2000;289(5484):1554-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5484.1554.
  53. Williamson MH, Brown KC. The analysis and modelling of British invasions. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1986;314(1167):505-22. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0070.