Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A multi-objective optimization framework for optimally designing steel moment frame structures under multiple seismic excitations

  • Ghasemof, Ali (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Mirtaheri, Masoud (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Mohammadi, Reza Karami (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Salkhordeh, Mojtaba (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology)
  • Received : 2022.04.17
  • Accepted : 2022.07.10
  • Published : 2022.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This article presents a computationally efficient framework for multi-objective seismic design optimization of steel moment-resisting frame (MRF) structures based on the nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure. This framework employs the uniform damage distribution philosophy to minimize the weight (initial cost) of the structure at different levels of damage. The preliminary framework was recently proposed by the authors based on the single excitation and the nonlinear static (pushover) analysis procedure, in which the effects of record-to-record variability as well as higher-order vibration modes were neglected. The present study investigates the reliability of the previous framework by extending the proposed algorithm using the nonlinear dynamic design procedure (optimization under multiple ground motions). Three benchmark structures, including 4-, 8-, and 12-story steel MRFs, representing the behavior of low-, mid-, and high-rise buildings, are utilized to evaluate the proposed framework. The total weight of the structure and the maximum inter-story drift ratio (IDRmax) resulting from the average response of the structure to a set of seven ground motion records are considered as two conflicting objectives for the optimization problem and are simultaneously minimized. The results of this study indicate that the optimization under several ground motions leads to almost similar outcomes in terms of optimization objectives to those are obtained from optimization under pushover analysis. However, investigation of optimal designs under a suite of 22 earthquake records reveals that the damage distribution in buildings designed by the nonlinear dynamic-based procedure is closer to the uniform distribution (desired target during the optimization process) compared to those designed according to the pushover procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Afshari, H., Hare, W. and Tesfamariam, S. (2019), "Constrained multi-objective optimization algorithms: Review and comparison with application in reinforced concrete structures", Appl. Soft Comput., 83(5), 105631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105631.
  2. AISC (2017), Steel Construction Manual, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  3. ANSI/AISC (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  4. ANSI/AISC 358-16 (2016), Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications, American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  5. ANSI/AISC 360-16 (2016), Specification for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  6. Asadi, P. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2020), "A practical methodology for optimum seismic design of RC frames for minimum damage and life-cycle cost", Eng. Struct., 202, 109896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109896.
  7. ASCE/SEI (2017), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  8. ASCE/SEI (2017), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  9. Bai, J., Chen, H., Jia, J., Sun, B. and Jin, S. (2020), "New lateral load distribution pattern for seismic design of deteriorating shear buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 139(10), 106344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106344.
  10. Basim, M.C. and Estekanchi, H.E. (2015), "Application of endurance time method in performance-based optimum design of structures", Struct. Safety, 56, 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.05.005.
  11. Dhiman, G. and Kumar, V. (2018a), "Emperor penguin optimizer: A bio-inspired algorithm for engineering problems", Knowl- Based Syst., 159(2), 20-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.001.
  12. Dhiman, G. and Kumar, V. (2018b), "Multi-objective spotted hyena optimizer: A Multi-objective optimization algorithm for engineering problems", Knowl-Based Syst., 150, 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.011.
  13. Dhiman, G., Singh, K.K., Soni, M., Nagar, A., Dehghani, M., Slowik, A., Kaur, A., Sharma, A., Houssein, E.H. and Cengiz, K. (2020), "MOSOA: A new multi-objective seagull optimization algorithm", Expert Syst. Appl., 167, 114150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114150.
  14. Faramarzi, A., Heidarinejad, M., Mirjalili, S. and Gandomi, A.H. (2020a), "Marine Predators Algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic", Expert Syst. Appl., 152(4), 113377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377.
  15. Faramarzi, A., Heidarinejad, M., Stephens, B. and Mirjalili, S. (2020b), "Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm", Knowl-Based Syst., 191, 105190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190.
  16. Farshchin, M., Maniat, M., Camp, C.V. and Pezeshk, S. (2018), "School based optimization algorithm for design of steel frames", Eng. Struct., 171(3), 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.085.
  17. FEMA P-58-1 (2018), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Volume 1 - Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency; Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  18. FEMA P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency; Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  19. Ghasemof, A., Mirtaheri, M. and Mohammadi, R.K. (2021a), "A new swift algorithm for bi-objective optimum design of steel moment frames", J. Build. Eng., 39(5), 102162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102162.
  20. Ghasemof, A., Mirtaheri, M., Mohammadi, R.K. and Mashayekhi, M.R. (2021b), "Multi-objective optimal design of steel MRF buildings based on life-cycle cost using a swift algorithm", Structures, 34(3), 4041-4059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.088.
  21. Ghasemof, A., Mirtaheri, M. and Mohammadi, R.K. (2022a), "Effects of demand parameters in the performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel moment frame buildings", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 153(1), 107075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107075.
  22. Ghasemof, A., Mirtaheri, M. and Mohammadi, R.K. (2022b), "Multi-objective optimization for probabilistic performancebased design of buildings using FEMA P-58 methodology", Eng. Struct., 254(1), 113856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113856.
  23. Gholizadeh, S. (2015), "Performance-based optimum seismic design of steel structures by a modified firefly algorithm and a new neural network", Adv. Eng. Softw., 81, 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.11.003.
  24. Gholizadeh, S. and Baghchevan, A. (2017), "Multi-objective seismic design optimization of steel frames by a chaotic metaheuristic algorithm", Eng. Comput., 33(4), 1045-1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0515-0.
  25. Gholizadeh, S. and Fattahi, F. (2021), "Multi-objective design optimization of steel moment frames considering seismic collapse safety", Eng. Comput., 37(2), 1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00886-y.
  26. Hasancebi, O. and Carbas, S. (2011), "Ant colony search method in practical structural optimization", Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 1, 91-105.
  27. Hashim, F.A., Hussain, K., Houssein, E.H., Mabrouk, M.S. and Al-Atabany, W. (2021), "Archimedes optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems", Appl. Intell., 51(3), 1531-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01893-z.
  28. Ibarra, L.F. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations", Report No.152; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA, U.S.A.
  29. Karami Mohammadi, R. (2001), "Effects of shear strength distribution on the reduction of seismic damage of structures", Ph.D. Dissertation, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  30. Kashani, A.R., Camp, C.V., Rostamian, M., Azizi, K. and Gandomi, A.H. (2021), "Population-based optimization in structural engineering: A review", Artif. Intell. Rev., 55, 345-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10036-w.
  31. Kaur, H., Rai, A., Bhatia, S.S. and Dhiman, G. (2020), "MOEPO: A novel Multi-objective Emperor Penguin Optimizer for global optimization: Special application in ranking of cloud service providers", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 96, 104008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104008.
  32. Kaveh, A., Fahimi-Farzam, M. and Kalateh-Ahani, M. (2015), "Optimum design of steel frame structures considering construction cost and seismic damage", Smart Struct. Syst., 16(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.1.001.
  33. Kaveh, A. and Dadras, A. (2017), "A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm: Thermal exchange optimization", Adv. Eng. Softw., 110, 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.03.014.
  34. Kaveh, A. and Mahdavi, V.R. (2019), "Multi-objective colliding bodies optimization algorithm for design of trusses", J. Comput. Design Eng., 6(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.04.001.
  35. Kaveh, A. and Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2020), "A new VPS-based algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems", Eng. Comput., 36(3), 1029-1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00747-8.
  36. Kaveh, A., Biabani Hamedani, K., Milad Hosseini, S. and Bakhshpoori, T. (2020), "Optimal design of planar steel frame structures utilizing meta-heuristic optimization algorithms", Structures, 25(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.032.
  37. Kaveh, A. and Rezazadeh Ardebili, S. (2021), "An improved plasma generation optimization algorithm for optimal design of reinforced concrete frames under time-history loading", Structures, 34(4), 758-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.040.
  38. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading", J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
  39. Lignos, D.G., Krawinkler, H. and Whittaker, A.S. (2011), "Prediction and validation of sidesway collapse of two scale models of a 4-story steel moment frame", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(7), 807-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1061.
  40. Lignos, D., Hartloper, A.R., Elkady, A.M.A., Deierlein, G.G. and Hamburger, R. (2019), "Proposed updates to the asce 41 nonlinear modeling parameters for wide-flange steel columns in support of performance-based seismic engineering", J. Struct. Eng., 145(9), 4019083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002353.
  41. Mahjoubi, S. and Bao, Y. (2021), "Game theory-based metaheuristics for structural design optimization", Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng., 36(10), 1337-1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12661.
  42. Mei, L. and Wang, Q. (2021), "Structural Optimization in Civil Engineering: A Literature Review", Buildings, 11(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020066.
  43. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M. and Lewis, A. (2014), "Grey Wolf Optimizer", Adv. Eng. Softw., 69, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.
  44. Mirjalili, S. (2015), "The Ant Lion Optimizer", Adv. Eng. Softw., 83, 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010.
  45. Mirjalili, S. (2016), "Dragonfly algorithm: A new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems", Neural Computing and Applications, 27(4), 1053-1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1.
  46. Mirjalili, S., Jangir, P. and Saremi, S. (2017), "Multi-objective ant lion optimizer: A multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems", Appl. Intell., 46(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0825-8.
  47. Moghaddam, H. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2004), "A new approach for optimum design of structures under dynamic excitation", Asian J. Civil Eng., 5(1-2), 69-84.
  48. Mohammadi, R.K., El Naggar, M.H. and Moghaddam, H. (2004), "Optimum strength distribution for seismic resistant shear buildings", Int. J. Solids Struct., 41(22-23), 6597-6612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.012.
  49. Moghaddam, H. (2009), "On the optimum performance-based design of structures", Proceedings of the U.S.-Iran Seismic Workshop, Irvine, California, June-July.
  50. Mohammadi, R.K. and Ghasemof, A. (2015), "Performance-based design optimization using uniform deformation theory: A comparison study", Latin American J. Solids Struct., 12(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78251207.
  51. Mohammadi, R.K., Mirjalaly, M., Mirtaheri, M. and Nazeryan, M. (2018), "Comparison between uniform deformation method and Genetic Algorithm for optimizing mechanical properties of dampers", Earthq. Struct., 14(1) https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.1.001.
  52. Mokarram, V. and Banan, M.R. (2018), "A new PSO-based algorithm for multi-objective optimization with continuous and discrete design variables", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 57(2), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1764-7.
  53. Mohammadi, R.K., Garoosi, M.R. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2019), "Practical method for optimal rehabilitation of steel frame buildings using buckling restrained brace dampers", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 123, 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.025.
  54. Mohammadi, R.K., Ghamari, H. and Farsangi, E.N. (2021), "Active control of building structures under seismic load using a new uniform deformation-based control algorithm", Structures, 33(3), 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.054.
  55. Nabid, N., Hajirasouliha, I. and Petkovski, M. (2020), "Multicriteria performance-based optimization of friction energy dissipation devices in RC frames", Earthq. Struct., 18(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.2.185.
  56. NIST (2010), "Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors", NIST GCR 10-917-8; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.
  57. OpenSees (2016), Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees); Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A. https://opensees.berkeley.edu
  58. Patel, C.C. and Jangid, R.S. (2011), "Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper", Earthq. Struct., 2(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.2.149.
  59. Patel, C.C. and Jangid, R.S. (2014), "Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damper", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 21(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1566.
  60. Rao, R. (2016), "Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems", Int. J. Industr. Eng. Comput., 7(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004.
  61. Rezazadeh, F. and Talatahari, S. (2020), "Seismic energy-based design of BRB frames using multi-objective vibrating particles system optimization", Structures, 24, 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.006.
  62. Saadat, S., Camp, C.V. and Pezeshk, S. (2016), "Probabilistic seismic loss analysis for the design of steel structures: optimizing for multiple-objective functions", Earthq. Spectra, 32(3), 1587-1605. https://doi.org/10.1193/080513EQS223M.
  63. Shabani, A., Asgarian, B., Gharebaghi, S.A., Salido, M.A. and Giret, A. (2019), "A new optimization algorithm based on search and rescue operations", Math. Probl. Eng., 2019(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2482543.
  64. Talatahari, S., Jalili, S. and Azizi, M. (2021), "Optimum design of steel building structures using migration-based vibrating particles system", Structures, 33(5), 1394-1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.028.
  65. USGS (2021), Unified Hazard Tool; U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, U.S.A. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/
  66. Wang, Q., Qiao, H., Domenico, D. de, Zhu, Z. and Tang, Y. (2020a), "Seismic response control of adjacent high-rise buildings linked by the Tuned Liquid Column Damper-Inerter (TLCDI)", Eng. Struct., 223(5), 111169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111169.
  67. Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Qin, X. and Sun, Y. (2020b), "An efficient discrete optimization algorithm for performance-based design optimization of steel frames", Adv. Struct. Eng., 23(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219872440.
  68. Yapici, H. and Cetinkaya, N. (2019), "A new meta-heuristic optimizer: Pathfinder algorithm", Appl. Soft Comput., 78, 545- 568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.012.
  69. Zou, X.K. and Chan, C.M. (2005), "An optimal resizing technique for seismic drift design of concrete buildings subjected to response spectrum and time history loadings", Comput. Struct., 83(19-20), 1689-1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.10.002.