DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

LC-MS/MS를 이용한 반려동물 사료에서 곰팡이독소 동시분석법 유효성 확인

Validation of simultaneous mycotoxin analysis method in pet food using LC-MS/MS

  • 최윤화 (서울특별시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 안우석 (서울특별시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 김지은 (서울특별시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 김두환 (서울특별시보건환경연구원)
  • Choi, Yoon Hwa (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health & Environment) ;
  • Ahn, Woo Seok (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health & Environment) ;
  • Kim, Ji Eun (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health & Environment) ;
  • Kim, Doo Hwan (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health & Environment)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.27
  • 심사 : 2022.09.02
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30

초록

The simultaneous analysis of mycotoxins using LC-MS/MS, a food official analysis method, was applied with compound feed for pets with high consumer preferences. In this study, the linearity of all calibration curves showed good linearity of 0.99 or more. and both the accuracy (recovery rate) and precision (repeatability) criteria of the concentration range for each mycotoxin in the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service's Validation and Verification Guidelines were met. And as a result of analyzing FAPAS QCM in the same way, it was assesed that the z-scores of Aflatoxin B1, Ochratoxin A, Zearalenone, and Fumonisin B1, were within ±2 range. This study showed that the application of the food official analysis method to compound feed for pets is suitable.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립농산물품질관리원. 2021. 사료 분석법의 유효성 확인 및 검증 지침.
  2. 농림축산식품부. 2021. 사료등의 기준 및 규격. 농림축산식품부고시 제2021-99호.
  3. 대한한돈협회. 2021. 2021년도 배합사료 품질 모니터링 사업최종보고서.
  4. 서울특별시. 2021. 특별기획과제. pp 272-299. 2020 보건환경백서. (주)디자인여백플러스, 서울.
  5. 식품의약품안전처. 2017. 아플라톡신 저감화 최근 연구동향.
  6. 식품의약품안전처. 2022. 식품의 기준 및 규격. 식품의약품안전처고시 제2022-25호.
  7. (주)메트릭스리서치. 2020. 2020 동물보호에 대한 국민의식조사결과보고서.
  8. 한국농수산식품유통공사. 2021. 2020 펫푸드 시장현황 보고서.
  9. Atungulu GG, Shad ZM, Wilson S. 2018. Mycotoxin Issues in Pet Food. pp. 25-44. Food and Feed Safety Systems and Analysis. Academic press. ScienceDirect.
  10. Calvo AM, Wilson RA, Bok JW, Keller NP. 2002. Relationship between secondary meta bolism and fungal development Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 66: 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.447-459.2002
  11. Jeong WI, Do SH, Jeong DH, Chung JY, Yang HJ, Yuan DW, Hong IH, Park JK, Goo MJ, Jeong KS. 2006. Canine renal failure syndrome in three dogs. J Vet Sci. 7(3):299-301. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2006.7.3.299
  12. Pleadin J, Zadravec M, Persi N, Vulic A, Jaki V, Mitak M. 2012. Mould and mycotoxin contamination of pig feed in northwest Croatia. Mycotoxin Res 28:157-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-012-0130-2
  13. Ra DK, Choi JY, Kim SH, Lee SH, Lee JH, Lee JG, Lee SM. 2018. The studies on mycotoxin contamination of forages using LC-MS/MS. 인천보건환경연구원보 16: 466-476.
  14. Rodrigues I, Naehrer K. 2012. A three-year survey on the worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in feed-stuffs and feed. Toxins 4:663-675. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins4090663
  15. Shin HS, Kim KH, Seo JS, Son YM, Park JY, Yoon SS, Jung BY. 2021. Prevalence of mycotoxin contamination in pig feedstuffs. Korean J Vet Serv. 44(4):315-320. https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2021.44.4.315
  16. Squire RA. 1981. Ranking animal carcinogens: a proposed regulatory approach Science 214: 877-880. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7302565
  17. Trail F, Mahanti N, Linz J. 1995. Molecular biology of aflatoxin biosynthesis Microbiology 141: 755-765. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-141-4-755