DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Micro-computed tomography for assessing the internal and external voids of bulk-fill composite restorations: A technical report

  • Tosco, Vincenzo (Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche) ;
  • Monterubbianesi, Riccardo (Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche) ;
  • Furlani, Michele (Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche) ;
  • Giuliani, Alessandra (Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche) ;
  • Putignano, Angelo (Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche) ;
  • Orsini, Giovanna (Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche)
  • Received : 2022.01.11
  • Accepted : 2022.04.27
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: This technical report aims to describe and detail the use of micro-computed tomography for a reliable evaluation of the bulk-fill composite/tooth interface. Materials and Methods: Bulk-fill composite restorations in tooth cavities were scanned using micro-computed tomography to obtain qualitatively and quantitatively valuable information. Two-dimensional information was processed using specific algorithms, and ultimately a 3-dimensional (3D) specimen reconstruction was generated. The 3D rendering allowed the visualization of voids inside bulk-fill composite materials and provided quantitative measurements. The 3D analysis software VG Studio MAX was used to perform image analysis and assess gap formation within the tooth-restoration interface. In particular, to evaluate internal adaptation, the Defect Analysis addon module of VG Studio Max was used. Results: The data, obtained with the processing software, highlighted the presence and the shape of gaps in different colours, representing the volume of porosity within a chromatic scale in which each colour quantitatively represents a well-defined volume. Conclusion: Micro-computed tomography makes it possible to obtain several quantitative parameters, providing fundamental information on defect shape and complexity. However, this technique has the limit of not discriminating materials without radiopacity and with low or no filler content, such as dental adhesives, and hence, they are difficult to visualise through software reconstruction.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

SISOPD (Societa Italiana Stomatologia, Odontoiatria e Protesi Dentaria-Italian Society of Dentistry, Stomatology and Prosthodontics) Foundation partially supported this study.

References

  1. Frencken JE, Sharma P, Stenhouse L, Green D, Laverty D, Dietrich T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis - a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44 Suppl 18: S94-105.
  2. Orsini G, Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Orilisi G, Putignano A. A new era in restorative dentistry. In: Longhi S, Monteriu A, Freddi A, Aquilanti L, Ceravolo MG, Carnevali O, et al. The first outstanding 50 years of "Universita Politecnica Delle Marche": research achievements in life sciences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. p. 319-34.
  3. Kaisarly D, Langenegger R, Litzenburger F, Heck K, El Gezawi M, Rosch P, et al. Effects of application method on shrinkage vectors and volumetric shrinkage of bulk-fill composites in class-II restorations. Dent Mater 2022; 38: 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.013
  4. El-Safty S, Silikas N, Watts DC. Creep deformation of restorative resin-composites intended for bulk-fill placement. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 928-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.038
  5. Hayashi J, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y, Sadr A. Real-time imaging of gap progress during and after composite polymerization. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 992-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517709005
  6. Hayashi J, Espigares J, Takagaki T, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Numata T, et al. Real-time in-depth imaging of gap formation in bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 585-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.020
  7. Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Orilisi G, Procaccini M, Grandini S, Putignano A, et al. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations. Minerva Stomatol 2020; 69: 207-14.
  8. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.009
  9. Garcia Mari L, Climent Gil A, Llena Puy C. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: high-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mater J 2019; 38: 721-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-160
  10. Cerda-Rizo ER, de Paula Rodrigues M, Vilela A, Braga S, Oliveira L, Garcia-Silva TC, et al. Bonding interaction and shrinkage stress of low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites with high-viscosity bulk fill or conventional resin composites. Oper Dent 2019; 44: 625-36. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-163-L
  11. Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, Neiva G. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk fill flowable composite resins. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 441-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-484-L
  12. Sun J, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S. 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X-ray micro-computed tomography to predict microleakage. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 314-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.010
  13. Ersen KA, Gurbuz O, Ozcan M. Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 1687-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03025-5
  14. Sampaio CS, Chiu KJ, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, PuppinRontani RM, Giannini M, et al. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class I flowable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2017; 42: E16-23. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-296-L
  15. Kim HJ, Park SH. Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage. Oper Dent 2014; 39: E57-70. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-378-L
  16. Tosco V, Vitiello F, Furlani M, Gatto ML, Monterubbianesi R, Giuliani A, et al. Microleakage analysis of different bulk-filling techniques for class II restorations: 𝜇-CT, SEM and EDS evaluations. Materials(Basel) 2020; 14: 31.
  17. Putignano A, Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Vitiello F, Gatto ML, Furlani M, et al. Comparison of three different bulk-filling techniques for restoring class II cavities: μCT, SEM-EDS combined analyses for margins and internal fit assessments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 124: 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104812
  18. Momose A. Recent advances in X-ray phase imaging. Jpn J Appl Phys 2005; 44: 6355-67. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.44.6355
  19. Sinibaldi R, Conti A, Sinjari B, Spadone S, Pecci R, Palombo M, et al. Multimodal-3D imaging based on μMRI and μCT techniques bridges the gap with histology in visualization of the bone regeneration process. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018; 12: 750-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2494