DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On the Influence of the Moment of Inertia of Gas on the Galactic Rotation Curves

  • Portnov, Yuriy A. (Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI))
  • 투고 : 2022.06.30
  • 심사 : 2022.08.21
  • 발행 : 2022.09.15

초록

There are two models that explain the rotation curves of galaxies: dark matter, which gives the missing contribution to the gravitational potential of the standard theory of gravity, and modified theories of gravity, according to which the gravitational potential is created by ordinary visible mass. Both models have some disadvantages. The article offers a new look at the problem of galactic rotation curves. The author suggests that the moment of inertia creates an additional gravitational potential along with the mass. The numerical simulation carried out on the example of fourteen galaxies confirms the validity of such an assumption. This approach makes it possible to explain the constancy of gas velocities outside the galactic disk without involving the hypothesis of the existence of dark matter. At the same time, the proposed approach lacks the disadvantages of modified theories of gravity, where the gravitational potential is created only by the mass of visible matter.

키워드

과제정보

I am very grateful to my wife and daughter, who supported me for several months while I was working on the article.

참고문헌

  1. Babourova OV, Frolov BN, Kudlaev PE, Axially symmetric solution of the Weyl-Dirac theory of gravitation and the problem of rotation curves of galaxies, Gravit. Cosmol. 24, 118-121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289318020020
  2. Battaglia G, Fraternali F, Oosterloo T, Sancisi R, Hi study of the warped spiral galaxy NGC5055: a disk/dark matter halo offset? Astron. Astrophys. 447, 49-62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053210
  3. Begeman KG, H I rotation curves of spiral galaxies: I - NGC 3198, Astron. Astrophys. 223, 47-60 (1989).
  4. Bidin CM, Carraro G, Mendez RA, Smith R, Kinematical and chemical vertical structure of the Galactic thick disk. II. a lack of dark matter in the solar neighborhood, Astrophys. J. 751, 30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/30
  5. Cohen Y, van Dokkum P, Danieli S, Romanowsky AJ, Abraham R, et al., The dragonfly nearby galaxies survey. V. HST/ACS observations of 23 low surface brightness objects in the fields of NGC 1052, NGC 1084, M96, and NGC 4258, Astrophys. J. 868, 96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae7c8
  6. Corbelli E, Salucci P, The extended rotation curve and the dark matter halo of M33, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 311, 441-447 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x
  7. Doroshkevich AG, Lukash VN, Mikheeva EV, A solution to the problems of cusps and rotation curves in dark matter halos in the cosmological standard model, Phys. Usp. 55, 3 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0182.201201a.0003
  8. Farnes JS, A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework, Astron. Astrophys. 620, A92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832898
  9. Freese K, Review of observational evidence for dark matter in the universe and in upcoming searches for dark stars, EAS Publications Series 36, 113-126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/eas/0936016
  10. Haghi H, Bazkiaei AE, Zonoozi AH, Roupa P, Declining rotation curves of galaxies as a test of gravitational theory, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 4172-4187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw573
  11. Jain B, Vikram V, Sakstein J, Astrophysical tests of modified gravity: constraints from distance indicators in the nearby universe, Astrophys. J. 779, 39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/39
  12. Makarov D, Prugniel P, Terekhova N, Courtois, H, Vauglin I, HyperLEDA. III. the catalogue of extragalactic distances, Astron. Astrophys. 570, A13 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423496
  13. McGaugh SS, Lelli F, Schombert JM, The radial acceleration relation in rotationally supported galaxies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 201101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.201101
  14. Milgrom M, MD or DM? Modified dynamics at low accelerations vs dark matter, Pos. Proc. Sci. 109, 033 (2011). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.109.0033
  15. Portnov YA, Formation of the initial distribution of matter inhomogeneities in the era of radiation domination, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 12, 1550097 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887815500978
  16. Portnov YA, Moment of inertia of gas as a source of added gravitational field in galaxies, J. Astron. Space Sci. 39, 59-65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2022.39.2.59
  17. Portnov YA, On the invariance in the inhomogeneous Lorentz group SO(1,3) in the context of optical vortex description, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 53, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02788-1
  18. Portnov YA, The gravitational redshift of a optical vortex being different from that of an gravitational redshift plane of an electromagnetic wave, J. Astrophys. Astron. 39, 38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-018-9530-9
  19. Schweizer F, Whitmore BC, Rubin VC, Colliding and merging galaxies. II - SO galaxies with polar rings, Astron. J. 88, 909-925 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1086/113377
  20. Thean AHC, Mundell CG, Pedlar A, Nicholson RA, A neutral hydrogen study of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 5033, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 290, 15-24 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/290.1.15
  21. van Dokkum P, Danieli S, Cohen Y, Merritt A, Romanowsky AJ, et al., A galaxy lacking dark matter, Nature. 555, 629-632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25767
  22. Verheijen MAW, The ursa major cluster of galaxies. V. H I rotation curve shapes and the tully-fisher relations, Astrophys. J. 563, 694-715 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1086/323887
  23. Vikhlinin A, Kravtsov A, Forman W, Jones C, Markevitch M, et al., Chandra sample of nearby relaxed galaxy clusters: mass, gas fraction, and mass-temperature relation, Astrophys. J. 640, 691-709 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1086/500288