DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of hard-type crosslinked hyaluronic acid with particulate bone substitute on bone regeneration: positive or negative?

  • Yun, Junseob (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jungwon (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koo, Ki-Tae (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seol, Yang-Jo (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Moo (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2021.09.10
  • Accepted : 2022.01.24
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The role of hard-type crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HA) with particulate bone substitutes in bone regeneration for combined inlay-onlay grafts has not been fully investigated. We aimed to evaluate the effect of hard-type crosslinked HA used with bone substitute in terms of new bone formation and space maintenance. Methods: A 15-mm-diameter round defect was formed in the calvaria of 30 New Zealand White rabbits. All animals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: the control group (spontaneous healing without material, n=10), the biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) graft group (BCP, n=10), and the BCP graft with HA group (BCP/HA, n=10). The animals were evaluated 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. Half of the animals from each group were sacrificed at 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. Samples were evaluated using micro-computed tomography, histology, and histomorphometry. Results: The BCP group showed higher bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) values than the control and BCP/HA groups at both 4 and 12 weeks. The BCP and BCP/HA groups showed higher bone surface/tissue volume (BS/TV) values than the control group at both 4 and 12 weeks. The BCP group showed higher BS/TV values than the control and BCP/HA groups at both 4 and 12 weeks. No statistically significant difference in newly formed bone was found among the 3 groups at 4 weeks. The BCP group showed significantly higher new bone formation than the BCP/HA group at 12 weeks. Conclusions: Hard-type crosslinked HA did not show a positive effect on new bone formation and space maintenance. The negative effect of hard-type crosslinked HA may be due to the physical properties of HA that impede osteogenic potential.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by grant No. 08- 2019-0002 from the Seoul National University Dental Hospital (SNUDH) Research Fund.

References

  1. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 2012;30:546-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005
  2. El-Rashidy AA, Roether JA, Harhaus L, Kneser U, Boccaccini AR. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: a review of in vivo studies in bone defect models. Acta Biomater 2017;62:1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030
  3. Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, et al. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng 2018;9:2041731418776819.
  4. Eliezer M, Imber JC, Sculean A, Pandis N, Teich S. Hyaluronic acid as adjunctive to non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:3423-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03012-w
  5. Shirakata Y, Imafuji T, Nakamura T, Kawakami Y, Shinohara Y, Noguchi K, et al. Periodontal wound healing/regeneration of two-wall intrabony defects following reconstructive surgery with cross-linked hyaluronic acid-gel with or without a collagen matrix: a preclinical study in dogs. Quintessence Int 2021;0:308-16.
  6. Huang L, Cheng YY, Koo PL, Lee KM, Qin L, Cheng JC, et al. The effect of hyaluronan on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in rat calvarial-derived cell cultures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:880-4.
  7. Kim JJ, Song HY, Ben Amara H, Kyung-Rim K, Koo KT. Hyaluronic acid improves bone formation in extraction sockets with chronic pathology: a pilot study in dogs. J Periodontol 2016;87:790-5. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150707
  8. Kim JJ, Ben Amara H, Park JC, Kim S, Kim TI, Seol YJ, et al. Biomodification of compromised extraction sockets using hyaluronic acid and rhBMP-2: an experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 2019;90:416-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0348
  9. Nguyen TB, Lee BT. A combination of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold with hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogel as a new tool for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 2014;20:1993-2004. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0352
  10. Ardizzoni A, Neglia RG, Baschieri MC, Cermelli C, Caratozzolo M, Righi E, et al. Influence of hyaluronic acid on bacterial and fungal species, including clinically relevant opportunistic pathogens. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011;22:2329-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4408-2
  11. Carlson GA, Dragoo JL, Samimi B, Bruckner DA, Bernard GW, Hedrick M, et al. Bacteriostatic properties of biomatrices against common orthopaedic pathogens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;321:472-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.165
  12. Pirnazar P, Wolinsky L, Nachnani S, Haake S, Pilloni A, Bernard GW. Bacteriostatic effects of hyaluronic acid. J Periodontol 1999;70:370-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.4.370
  13. Hinsenkamp A, Ezsias B, Pal E, Hricisak L, Fulop A, Besztercei B, et al. Crosslinked hyaluronic acid gels with blood-derived protein components for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 2021;27:806-20. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0197
  14. Schante CE, Zuber G, Herlin C, Vandamme TF. Chemical modifications of hyaluronic acid for the synthesis of derivatives for a broad range of biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 2011;85:469-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.019
  15. Hardy JG, Lin P, Schmidt CE. Biodegradable hydrogels composed of oxime crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol), hyaluronic acid and collagen: a tunable platform for soft tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2015;26:143-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2014.975393
  16. Lee YM, Nam SH, Seol YJ, Kim TI, Lee SJ, Ku Y, et al. Enhanced bone augmentation by controlled release of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 from bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 2003;74:865-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.6.865
  17. Bae SY, Park JC, Shin HS, Lee YK, Choi SH, Jung UW. Tomographic and histometric analysis of autogenous bone block and synthetic hydroxyapatite block grafts without rigid fixation on rabbit calvaria. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014;44:251-8. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.251
  18. Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Lee YM. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1124-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01744.x
  19. Delgado-Ruiz RA, Calvo Guirado JL, Romanos GE. Bone grafting materials in critical defects in rabbit calvariae. A systematic review and quality evaluation using ARRIVE guidelines. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:620-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12614
  20. Sohn JY, Park JC, Um YJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, et al. Spontaneous healing capacity of rabbit cranial defects of various sizes. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:180-7. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.180
  21. Ghiacci G, Graiani G, Ravanetti F, Lumetti S, Manfredi E, Galli C, et al. "Over-inlay" block graft and differential morphometry: a novel block graft model to study bone regeneration and host-to-graft interfaces in rats. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:220-33. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.220
  22. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000412.
  23. De Boulle K, Glogau R, Kono T, Nathan M, Tezel A, Roca-Martinez JX, et al. A review of the metabolism of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether-crosslinked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:1758-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12301
  24. Matheus HR, Ervolino E, Gusman DJ, Alves BE, Fiorin LG, Pereira PA, et al. Association of hyaluronic acid with a deproteinized bovine graft improves bone repair and increases bone formation in critical-size bone defects. J Periodontol 2021;92:1646-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.20-0613
  25. Cestari TM, Granjeiro JM, de Assis GF, Garlet GP, Taga R. Bone repair and augmentation using block of sintered bovine-derived anorganic bone graft in cranial bone defect model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:340-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01659.x
  26. Simion M, Rocchietta I, Kim D, Nevins M, Fiorellini J. Vertical ridge augmentation by means of deproteinized bovine bone block and recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB: a histologic study in a dog model. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:415-23.
  27. Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos GE, Alexandre Gerhke S, Gomez-Moreno G, Mate-Sanchez de Val JE, CalvoGuirado JL. Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation: animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:792-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12942
  28. Lee JB, Chu S, Ben Amara H, Song HY, Son MJ, Lee J, et al. Effects of hyaluronic acid and deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen for ridge preservation in compromised extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2021;92:1564-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.20-0832
  29. Gough JE, Scotchford CA, Downes S. Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde crosslinked collagen/poly(vinyl alcohol) films is by the mechanism of apoptosis. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:121-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10145
  30. Adamiak K, Sionkowska A. Current methods of collagen cross-linking: review. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;161:550-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.075