대한정형도수물리치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy)

  • 제28권2호
  • /
  • Pages.15-24
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-3680(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-7282(eISSN)
대한정형도수물리치료학회 (Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy)
권호 표지

물리치료사의 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 원격운동재활에 대한 인식도에 대한 연구

A Study on Awareness of Tele Exercise Rehabilitation According to Demographic Characteristics of Physical Therapists

  • 박세진 (남부대학교 대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 유성훈 (남부대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박성두 (허리편한병원 물리치료실)
  • Park, Se-jin (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Nambu University) ;
  • Yu, Seung-hun (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Nambu University) ;
  • Park, Sung-doo (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Good Spine Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.19
  • 심사 : 2022.07.24
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: This study investigated the perception of community care-based tele exercise rehabilitation according to demographic characteristics of physical therapists and presented basic data for the spread of tele exercise rehabilitation within community care. Methods: The study collected and analyzed data from 195 physical therapists. The analysis was performed using frequency analysis with 10 general characteristics, 13 tele exercise rehabilitation recognition questions, and a total of 23 questions. Analysis of general characteristics of study subjects and recognition of tele exercise rehabilitation were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage using frequency analysis. Chi-squared test was used to compare general characteristics and tele exercise rehabilitation recognition. Correlation analysis of major sociodemographic variables affecting the perception of remote exercise rehabilitation was conducted. Results: The awareness level of physical therapists for remote exercise rehabilitation was confirmed. The difference in the recognition of remote motor rehabilitation in the number of therapists, career, hospital form according to the sociodemographic characteristics showed statistically significant differences. Conclusion: It is necessary to first raise awareness of therapists through the promotion of tele exercise rehabilitation, and furthermore, in the future, it will be necessary to find a policy direction and plan on how tele exercise rehabilitation can be applied to rehabilitation services in local communities care.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년도 남부대학교 학술연구비의 지원을 받아 연구되었음

참고문헌

  1. Anton D, Berges I, Bermudez J, et al. A telerehabilitation system for the selection, evaluation and remote management of therapies. Sensors. 2018;18(5):1459. http://doi.org/10.3390/s18051459
  2. Bennell KL, Rini C, Keefe F, et al. Effects of adding an internet-based pain coping skills training protocol to a standardized education and exercise program for people with persistent hip pain (HOPE trial): Randomized controlled trial protocol. Phys Ther. 2015;95(10):1408-1422. http://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150119
  3. Burke BL, Hall RW. Telemedicine: Pediatric applications. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):293-308. http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1517
  4. Cha YR, Kim JY, Jung BK. Awareness and needs for community based telerehabilitation service: a survey for users of centers for independent living. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2017;21(4):119-147. http://doi.org/10.16884/JRR.2017.21.4.119
  5. Cho YH. The working activities of island community health practitioners in relation to the island's demographic characteristics. Journal of Korean Island. 2011;23(2):69-83.
  6. Eriksson L, Lindstrom B, Ekenberg L. Patients' experiences of telerehabilitation at home after shoulder joint replacement. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):25-30. http://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2010.100317
  7. Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Fatoye C, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(6):e15375. http://doi.org/10.2196/15375
  8. Fook VFS, Hao SZ, Wai AAP, et al. Innovative platform for tele-physiotherapy, Proceeding of HealthCom 2008-10th International Conference one-health Networking, Applications and Services, IEEE, Singapore. 2008;59-65. http://doi.org/10.1109/HEALTH.2008.4600111
  9. Frederix I, Hansen D, Coninx K, et al. Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: A cost-effectiveness analysis. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2016;23(7):674-682. http://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315602257
  10. Holland AE. Telephysiotherapy: Time to get online. J Physiother. 2017;63(4):193-195. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2017.08.001
  11. Kang YG, Lee PY, Bae YS. 2020 senior statistics, Census Report, Statistics Korea. Republic of Korea. 2020.
  12. Kim CJ. Comparative legal analysis of Korean and Japanese telemedicine and legislative assignment. Civil Society & NGO. 2016;14(1):213-249.
  13. Kim JY, Lee DW, Jeong MB. Effect of a telere habilitation exercise program on the gait, knee function and quality of life In patients with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2020;15(1):143-152. http://doi.org/10.13066/ kspm.2020.15.1.143
  14. Laver KE, Adey WZ, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;31:CD010255. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3
  15. Lee YJ, Park CW. A study on the role of integrated local community care in the elderly care system in Korea in the age of aging. Journal of Community Welfare. 2022;80:205-231. http://doi.org/10.15300/jcw.2022.80.1.205
  16. Longacre CF, Nyman JA, Visscher SL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the collaborative care to preserve performance in cancer (COPE) trial tele-rehabilitation interventions for patients with advanced cancers. Cancer medicine. 2020;9(8):2723-2731. http://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2837
  17. Ministry of Health and Welfare. community based rehabilitation. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2019.
  18. Nelson M, Bourke M, Crossley K, et al. Telerehabilitation is non-inferior to usual care following total hip replacement: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Physiotherapy. 2020;107:19-27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.06.006.
  19. Pastora-bernal JM, Martin-Valero R, Baron-Lopez FJ. Cost analysis of telerehabilitation after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(8):553-559. http://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17723367
  20. Piron L, Turolla A, Tonin P, et al. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(5):257-260. http://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2008.080304
  21. Richardson BR, Truter P, Blumke R, et al. Physiotherapy assessment and diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders of the knee via telerehabilitation, J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(1):88-95. http://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15627237
  22. Russell TG. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine, J Telemed Telecare. 2017;13(5):217-220. http://doi.org/10.1258/135763307781458886
  23. Russell TG, Buttrum P, Wootton R, et al. Rehabilitation after total knee replacement via low-bandwidth telemedicine: The patient and therapist experience. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(1):85-87. http://doi.org/10.1258/1357633042614384
  24. Tousignant M, Moffet H, Nadeau S, et al. Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e3844. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3844