DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk perceptions of a population living near a municipal waste incinerator and associated factors with the prevalence of environmental disease

  • Dong Hyun Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Chae Kwan Lee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Jeong Ho Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Byung Chul Son (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Chunhui Suh (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Kunhyung Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Byeong Jin Ye (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine & Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.05.05
  • Accepted : 2022.10.17
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the risk perceptions, prevalence of environmental diseases (EDs) and associated factors with the prevalence of environmental disease among the population living near an incinerator Methods: Study area were divided into 3 local areas near the incinerator by distance (A, B, C) and control area (D) by distance and geographic isolation. A Questionnaire was conducted with 1,380 in local residents (A, B, C) and 390 in control area (D), gathered information of demographic characteristics, lifestyle, perception of damage by incinerators, experience of EDs (atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma) diagnosed by physician. Analysis of variance, χ2 test, and Kruskal Wallis test was applied to determine the difference by area. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis. Results: Residents residing closer to the incinerator had negative perception in most items in questionnaire compared with control. The prevalence of allergic rhinitis was higher as they lived nearby the incinerator (p = 0.008). The associated factors with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis were carpet (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79, p = 0.001), residential area (marginally significant), duration of residence (OR: 1.09, p < 0.001). The perception of environmental pollution around the residential area was inversely associated with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis: perceived as very dissatisfied (OR: 4.21, p = 0.02) compared with very satisfied. Conclusions: As closer to the incinerator, the risk perception tend to negative and prevalence of EDs were increased. Carpet, residential area, duration of residence and perception of environmental air pollution around the residential area were associated with prevalence of allergic rhinitis. These results may be useful for the communication with residents to discuss the environmental problems caused by the incinerator.

Keywords

References

  1. Lim SY, Lim KM, Yoo SH. External benefits of waste-to-energy in Korea: a choice experiment study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;34:588-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.045
  2. Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 2009;34(12):2116-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023
  3. Allsopp M, Costner P, Johnston P. Incineration and human health. State of knowledge of the impacts of waste incinerators on human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2001;8(2):141-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987308
  4. Lima ML. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. J Environ Psychol 2004;24(1):71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-4
  5. Jeon JS. An analysis on the structure of locational conflicts: focused on the case of Kangnam Incinerator. Korean Soc Public Adm 2002;13(3):239-63.
  6. Bena A, Gandini M, Cadum E, Procopio E, Salamina G, Orengia M, et al. Risk perception in the population living near the Turin municipal solid waste incineration plant: survey results before start-up and communication strategies. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):483.
  7. Lee CS, Lim YW, Kim HH, Yang JY, Shin DC. Exposure to heavy metals in blood and risk perception of the population living in the vicinity of municipal waste incinerators in Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2012;19(5):1629-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0677-z
  8. Miyake Y, Yura A, Misaki H, Ikeda Y, Usui T, Iki M, et al. Relationship between distance of schools from the nearest municipal waste incineration plant and child health in Japan. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(12):1023-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-4116-7
  9. Lee JH, Hong YC, Lee KH, Kwon HJ, Jang JY. Exposure assessment of PCDD/Fs and monitoring of health effects on workers and residents near the waste incinerators in Korea. Korean J Prev Med 2003;36(4):314-22.
  10. Myung NI, Lee YS, Shin DY. A case study on health impact assessment from incinerator operation in new towns - human risk assessment due to heavy metals inhalation. J Environ Impact Assess 2010;19(3):271-9.
  11. Kim YM, Kim JW, Lee HJ. Burden of disease attributable to air pollutants from municipal solid waste incinerators in Seoul, Korea: a source-specific approach for environmental burden of disease. Sci Total Environ 2011;409(11):2019-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.032
  12. Lin PY, Lai SP, Wang MC, Liang JJ, Chiang CF, Kuo HW. Environmental health risks perception, attitude, and avoidance behaviour toward municipal solid waste incinerator. Int J Environ Health Res 2018;28(2):159-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1453052
  13. Yim CH, Lee CM, Kim JS, Lee SY. Differential impact of incinerator operation levels on nearby housing. J Korea Plan Assoc 2002;37(3):255-67.
  14. Moon J. Cogeneration plant and environmental allergic diseases: is it really an eco-friendly energy source? Ann Occup Environ Med 2020;32:e38.
  15. Chong SN, Chew FT. Epidemiology of allergic rhinitis and associated risk factors in Asia. World Allergy Organ J 2018;11(1):17.
  16. Yang Y, Wang Y, Lv L, Sun Y, Li C, Fan Y, et al. The prevalence and associated lifestyle risk factors of self-reported allergic rhinitis in Kazakh population of Fukang city. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(39):e8032.
  17. Bugiani M, Carosso A, Migliore E, Piccioni P, Corsico A, Olivieri M, et al. Allergic rhinitis and asthma comorbidity in a survey of young adults in Italy. Allergy 2005;60(2):165-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00659.x
  18. Grize L, Gassner M, Wuthrich B, Bringolf-Isler B, Takken-Sahli K, Sennhauser FH, et al. Trends in prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis in 5-7-year old Swiss children from 1992 to 2001. Allergy 2006;61(5):556-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01030.x
  19. Park DY, Lee CK. Association between air pollutant levels and medical usage rates of environmental disease in a general residential area. J Environ Health Sci 2021;47(3):279-91. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2021.47.3.279
  20. Orru K, Nordin S, Harzia H, Orru H. The role of perceived air pollution and health risk perception in health symptoms and disease: a population-based study combined with modelled levels of PM10. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2018;91(5):581-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1303-x