DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impacts of presenteeism on work-related injury absence and disease absence

  • Youna Won (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Hwan-Cheol Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Jiho Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Minsun Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Seong-Cheol Yang (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Shin-Goo Park (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Jong-Han Leem (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.04.11
  • Accepted : 2022.08.23
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

Background: Many studies have been conducted on presenteeism and absenteeism, but the relationship between presenteeism and absenteeism is unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of presenteeism on future absenteeism. Methods: This study was conducted on non-white collar workers that underwent general health examinations in 2014 and 2015. We asked subjects to fill out a questionnaire about their experiences of presenteeism for the past one year in 2014. In 2015, it was checked whether the same subjects had any experience of absence from work due to injury or disease during the past year. The χ2 test was used to analyze relationships between sociodemographic and occupational characteristics, presenteeism, and absence. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by logistic regression analysis controlled for confounding factors. Results: A total of 12,572 workers were included in the study. For workers who experienced presenteeism, the OR for injury absence was 2.705 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.044-3.581), and the OR for disease absence was 4.906 (95% CI: 3.996-6.024) after adjusting for sociodemographic and occupational confounding factors. For men that experienced presenteeism, the OR for injury absence was 3.035 (95% CI: 2.258-4.081), and the OR for disease absence was 5.508 (95% CI: 4.340-6.989). For women that experienced presenteeism, the OR for injury absence was 1.322 (95% CI: 0.577-3.028), which was not significant, and the OR for disease absence was 3.629 (95% CI: 2.405-5.475). Conclusions: This study suggests that presenteeism can influence future absenteeism. The effect of presenteeism may depend on cause of absence. Men who experienced presenteeism showed greater effects on injury and disease absence than women. For women, experience of presenteeism had a significant effect on disease absence but not on injury absence.

Keywords

References

  1. Karanika-Murray M, Cooper CL. Presenteeism: an introduction to a prevailing global phenomenon. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33625/1/8260_Karanika-Murray.pdf. Updated 2018. Accessed May 14, 2021.
  2. Taloyan M, Aronsson G, Leineweber C, Magnusson Hanson L, Alexanderson K, Westerlund H. Sickness presenteeism predicts suboptimal self-rated health and sickness absence: a nationally representative study of the Swedish working population. PLoS One 2012;7(9):e44721.
  3. Boles M, Pelletier B, Lynch W. The relationship between health risks and work productivity. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46(7):737-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000131830.45744.97
  4. Hemp P. Presenteeism: at work--but out of it. Harv Bus Rev 2004;82(10):49-58, 155.
  5. Lohaus D, Habermann W. Presenteeism: a review and research directions. Hum Resour Manage Rev 2019;29(1):43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.010
  6. Bielecky A, Chen C, Ibrahim S, Beaton DE, Mustard CA, Smith PM. The impact of co-morbid mental and physical disorders on presenteeism. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015;41(6):554-64. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3524
  7. Krane L, Larsen EL, Nielsen CV, Stapelfeldt CM, Johnsen R, Risor MB. Attitudes towards sickness absence and sickness presenteeism in health and care sectors in Norway and Denmark: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2014;14(1):880.
  8. Kim MS, Park JB, Min KB, Lee KJ, Kwon K. Presenteeism among self-employed workers: Korean working conditions survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2014;26:32.
  9. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54(7):502-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.502
  10. Leineweber C, Westerlund H, Hagberg J, Svedberg P, Alexanderson K. Sickness presenteeism is more than an alternative to sickness absence: results from the population-based SLOSH study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2012;85(8):905-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0735-y
  11. Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 5. Risk factors for sick leave - general studies. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2004;63:49-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034950410021853
  12. Veazie MA, Smith GS. Heavy drinking, alcohol dependence, and injuries at work among young workers in the United States labor force. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000;24(12):1811-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb01985.x
  13. Buvik K, Moan IS, Halkjelsvik T. Alcohol-related absence and presenteeism: beyond productivity loss. Int J Drug Policy 2018;58:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.005
  14. Cheng WJ, Huang MC, Cheng Y, Chen CH, Chen CJ. Consumption of alcoholic energy drinks is associated with work-related injury or disease among manual workers in Taiwan. Alcohol Alcohol 2015;50(4):458-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv022
  15. Barnes AJ, Zimmerman FJ. Associations of occupational attributes and excessive drinking. Soc Sci Med 2013;92:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.023
  16. Lincoln AE, Smith GS, Amoroso PJ, Bell NS. The effect of cigarette smoking on musculoskeletal-related disability. Am J Ind Med 2003;43(4):337-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10195
  17. Lee JJ, Patel R, Biermann JS, Dougherty PJ. The musculoskeletal effects of cigarette smoking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(9):850-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00375
  18. Jang SW, Kim HC, Kim JH, Kim MS, Won Y, Ju H, et al. Association between nicotine dependency with occupational injury in Korean men. Ann Occup Environ Med 2021;33:e14.
  19. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2224-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
  20. Bhattacherjee A, Chau N, Sierra CO, Legras B, Benamghar L, Michaely JP, et al. Relationships of job and some individual characteristics to occupational injuries in employed people: a community-based study. J Occup Health 2003;45(6):382-91. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.45.382
  21. Johns G. Presenteeism in the workplace: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav 2010;31(4):519-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630
  22. Kim HC, Min JY, Min KB, Park SG. Job strain and the risk for occupational injury in small- to medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a prospective study of 1,209 Korean employees. Am J Ind Med 2009;52(4):322-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20673
  23. Bergstrom G, Bodin L, Hagberg J, Aronsson G, Josephson M. Sickness presenteeism today, sickness absenteeism tomorrow? A prospective study on sickness presenteeism and future sickness absenteeism. J Occup Environ Med 2009;51(6):629-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a8281b