Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

  • Volume 34
  • /
  • Pages.6.1-6.12
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-3618(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2052-4374(eISSN)
The Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (대한직업환경의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The relevant factors of work-related fatigue for occupational vibrationexposed employees

  • YongDuk Ahn (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Jeongbae Rhie (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Min-Gi Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dankook University Hospital)
  • Received : 2021.10.31
  • Accepted : 2022.02.28
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: To date, little is known about the effects of factors linked to work-related fatigue on vibration-exposed workers. Thus, the purpose of this study was (1) to assess the effects of vibration exposure time per week and work-related fatigue on workers and (2) to identify factors associated with work-related fatigue caused by long-term exposure to occupational vibration. Methods: This study used data collected from the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey. A total of 34,820 non-vibration-exposed and 10,776 vibration-exposed employees were selected from the data. The χ2 and multiple logistic regression were used to determine the effect of vibration exposure time per week and the effects of factors of work-related fatigue on workers. Results: The prevalence of work-related fatigue in vibration-exposed workers (30.5%) was higher than that of non-exposed workers (15.9%). The prevalence of work-related fatigue was higher for female and workers with depression, anxiety, and shift work, and those with authority to control their work pace had statistically significantly higher odds than those who did not. The employees who had the authority to control their order of work (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.95) and method of work (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.98) had statistically significantly lower odds than those who did not. The OR of workrelated fatigue symptoms was highest among employees whose vibration exposure time per week were 30.0%-40.0% (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.96-2.83). Lower OR was observed as vibration exposure time per week decreased. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest an association between occupational vibration and work-related fatigue and longer vibration exposure time per week, causing an increased prevalence of work-related fatigue symptoms. Measures to protect workers exposed to occupational vibration from work-related fatigue must be taken.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank the Safety and Health Policy Research Department (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute [OSHRI]) for providing raw data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). The paper's contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the OSHRI.

References

  1. David A, Pelosi A, McDonald E, Stephens D, Ledger D, Rathbone R, et al. Tired, weak, or in need of rest: fatigue among general practice attenders. BMJ 1990;301(6762):1199-202. 
  2. Aaronson LS, Teel CS, Cassmeyer V, Neuberger GB, Pallikkathayil L, Pierce J, et al. Defining and measuring fatigue. Image J Nurs Sch 1999;31(1):45-50. 
  3. Wessely S, Powell R. Fatigue syndromes: a comparison of chronic "postviral" fatigue with neuromuscular and affective disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52(8):940-8. 
  4. Gibson H, Edwards RH. Muscular exercise and fatigue. Sports Med 1985;2(2):120-32. 
  5. O'Dell MW, Meighen M, Riggs RV. Correlates of fatigue in HIV infection prior to AIDS: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18(5):249-54. 
  6. Lee KA, Hicks G, Nino-Murcia G. Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. Psychiatry Res 1991;36(3):291-8. 
  7. Grandjean E. Fatigue: its physiological and psychological significance. Ergonomics 1968;11(5):427-36. 
  8. Addington AM, Gallo JJ, Ford DE, Eaton WW. Epidemiology of unexplained fatigue and major depression in the community: the Baltimore ECA follow-up, 1981-1994. Psychol Med 2001;31(6):1037-44. 
  9. Kant IJ, Bultmann U, Schroer KA, Beurskens AJ, Van Amelsvoort LG, Swaen GM. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med 2003;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i32-9. 
  10. Chen MK. The epidemiology of self-perceived fatigue among adults. Prev Med 1986;15(1):74-81. 
  11. Techera U, Hallowell M, Stambaugh N, Littlejohn R. Causes and consequences of occupational fatigue: meta-analysis and systems model. J Occup Environ Med 2016;58(10):961-73. 
  12. Akerstedt T. Psychological and psychophysiological effects of shift work. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990;16 Suppl 1:67-73. 
  13. Hulshof C, van Zanten BV. Whole-body vibration and low-back pain. A review of epidemiologic studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1987;59(3):205-20. 
  14. Hadpe M, Deshmukh DS, Solanki PM. Vibration analysis of a two wheeler (analytically). Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2014;3(11):17415-21. 
  15. Jiao K, Li Z, Chen M, Wang C, Qi S. Effect of different vibration frequencies on heart rate variability and driving fatigue in healthy drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77(3):205-12.
  16. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute (OSHRI). The Results of 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey. Ulsan, Korea: OSHRI; 2017.
  17. Park J, Lee N. First Korean Working Conditions Survey: a comparison between South Korea and EU countries. Ind Health 2009;47(1):50-4. 
  18. Faro M, Saez-Francas N, Castro-Marrero J, Aliste L, Fernandez de Sevilla T, Alegre J. Gender differences in chronic fatigue syndrome. Reumatol Clin 2016;12(2):72-7. 
  19. Faro M, Saez-Francas N, Castro-Marrero J, Aliste L, Collado A, Alegre J. Impact of the fibromyalgia in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Med Clin (Barc) 2014;142(12):519-25. 
  20. Chung KI, Song CH. Clinical usefulness of fatigue severity scale for patients with fatigue, and anxiety or depression. Korean J Psychosom Med 2001;9(2):164-73.
  21. Park IS, Kim CS, Kim R, Kim YJ, Park MH. Stress, anxiety and fatigue of nursing students in clinical practice. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2005;11(2):151-60.
  22. Park J, Kim Y, Chung HK, Hisanaga N. Long working hours and subjective fatigue symptoms. Ind Health 2001;39(3):250-4. 
  23. Beaulieu JK. The Issues of Fatigue and Working Time in the Road Transport Sector. ILO Working Papers. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization; 2005.
  24. Books C, Coody LC, Kauffman R, Abraham S. Night shift work and its health effects on nurses. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2017;36(4):347-53. 
  25. Michalos G, Makris S, Chryssolouris G. The effect of job rotation during assembly on the quality of final product. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2013;6(3):187-97. 
  26. Winwood PC, Winefield AH, Dawson D, Lushington K. Development and validation of a scale to measure work-related fatigue and recovery: the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER). J Occup Environ Med 2005;47(6):594-606. 
  27. Van Yperen NW, Hagedoorn M. Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or job strain or both? The role of job control and social support. Acad Management Ann 2003;46(10):339-48.
  28. Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Helkama K. Organization justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. J Appl Psychol 2001;86(3):418-24. 
  29. de Croon EM, Blonk RW, de Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, Broersen JP. Job stress, fatigue, and job dissatisfaction in Dutch lorry drivers: towards an occupation specific model of job demands and control. Occup Environ Med 2002;59(6):356-61. 
  30. Angelova V, Giebe T, Ivanova-Stenzel R. Competition and Fatigue at Work. Discussion Paper No. 134. Munchen and Berlin, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen and Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin; 2018.
  31. Kittusamy NK, Buchholz B. An ergonomic evaluation of excavating operations: a pilot study. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001;16(7):723-6. 
  32. Alam MM, Khan AA, Farooq M. Effect of whole-body vibration on neuromuscular performance: a literature review. Work 2018;59(4):571-83. 
  33. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, et al. The measurement of effortreward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 2004;58(8):1483-99. 
  34. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 1998;3(4):322-55. 
  35. Choi SH, Hong SI, Jang HK. Assessment of anti-vibration gloves for reduction of hand-transmitted vibration exposure. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2008;18(1):1-10.
  36. Hewitt S, Dong RG, Welcome DE, McDowell TW. Anti-vibration gloves? Ann Occup Hyg 2015;59(2):127-41.
  37. Hewitt S, Dong R, McDowell T, Welcome D. The efficacy of anti-vibration gloves. Acoust Aust 2016;44(1):121-7. 
  38. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Hand-Arm Vibration: TLV(R) Physical Agents. 7th ed. Cincinnati, OH, USA: ACGIH; 2019.
  39. Yung M, Dale AM, Kapellusch J, Bao S, Harris-Adamson C, Meyers AR, et al. Modeling the effect of the 2018 revised ACGIH® hand activity threshold limit Value® (TLV) at reducing risk for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Environ Hyg 2019;16(9):628-33.