DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Case study of Ontact PBL Development and Application to Improve Teaching Presence & Learning Presence

교수실재감 및 학습실재감을 높이기 위한 Ontact PBL 개발 및 적용 사례 연구

  • Received : 2022.05.29
  • Accepted : 2022.06.29
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to realize Ontact PBL that can sufficiently contain interactive elements that can increase the perception of reality between professors and students in an environment without human contact. This is a class designed, developed, and operated ontact PBL for the first semester of 2021. As a result of diagnosing the realism of teaching and learning for students who took the class, the average teaching realism improved significantly by 0.95. This was found to be effective in improving the sense of realism in teaching as there were many related opinions in the reflective journal on students' classes. In addition, there was an effect on learning presence, and it was confirmed that emotional presence, which is a sub-element of learning presence, significantly improved by 0.7, social presence by 0.5, and cognitive presence by 0.6. Learning presence also confirmed the students' reflection on the class, and it was possible to judge that Ontact PBL was effective in improving the sense of presence.

본 연구의 목적은 학습자간 대면 접촉이 없는 환경에서 교수-학생간 실재감 인식을 높일 수 있는 상호작용적 요소를 강화한 Ontact PBL을 구현하여 이제 갓 대학을 입학한 대학생들이 1학년 1학기 교양 교과목에서 비대면 수업 환경에서 학습자가 중심의 협력학습을 수행해야 하는 PBL 수업을 통해 교수실재감 및 학습실재감이 향상되었는지 살펴보며, 실재감이 향상된 수업 사례를 제시하고자 하는 연구이다. 이 수업은 2021년 1학기 Ontact PBL을 설계 및 개발하여 운영하였으며, 해당 수업을 수강한 학생들을 대상으로 교수실재감 및 학습실재감을 진단하여 실제로 수업을 통해 교수실재감은 평균 0.95점 유의미하게 향상되어, 학습실재감보다 많이 향상되었고, 이는 학생들의 수업에 대한 성찰 저널에서도 관련 의견이 많아 교수실재감 향상에 효과적임을 알 수 있었다. 더불어 학습실재감도 효과가 있었는데, 학습실재감의 하위요소인 감성적 실재감은 0.7점, 사회적 실재감은 0.5점, 인지적 실재감은 0.6점 가량 유의미하게 향상됨을 확인하였다. 학습실재감 또한 학생들의 수업에 대한 성찰을 확인하여, Ontact PBL이 실재감 향상에 효과가 있다고 판단할 수 있었다. 향후 Ontact PBL의 실재감 향상 요인 연구, Ontact PBL을 통한 학생 역량 향상 연구 등을 후속 연구로 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, I. A. (1997). Why Constructivism? : The information age and learner-centered educational environment. Moonumsa, Seoul.
  2. Kang, I. A. (2003). Theory and practice of PBL. Moonumsa, Seoul.
  3. Kang, I. A., Heo, J. P., & Choi, S. K. (2017). The effect of flipped PBL instruction on interest and academic achievement in college liberal arts mathematics class. Korean Journal of General Education. 11(3), 331-375.
  4. Kang, M. H., & Kim, M. J. (2006). Investigating the relationship among perceived social presence, achievement, satisfaction and learning persistence in e-Learning Environment. Korean Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.22.4.1
  5. Kang, M. H., Lee, G. H., Yun, S. H., & Kim, M. J. (2011). Identifying the relationship among emotional presence, flow, and learning outcomes in corporate e-learning. The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD 7(2), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.35637/KLEHRD.2011.7.2.002
  6. Kwon, S. Y. (2011). The investigation of the relationships among social presence, learners' characteristics, perceived effects of discussion, perceived learning and satisfaction in online learning. The Journal of Educational Studies, 42(3), 55-82.
  7. Kwon, S. Y. (2016). The influences of social presence on perceived cognitive and emotional effects of online discussion. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 22(1), 1-29 https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.22.1.001
  8. KIim, N. D., Jeon, M. Y., Lee, H. E., Lee, J. Y., Kim, S. Y., Choi, J. H., Seo, Y. H. & Lee, S. J (2017). Trend Korea 2018. Mireabook. Seoul.
  9. Kim, S. H, & Kim, M. J. (2006). The effects of types of instructor facilitation on learners' social presence, interaction, satisfaction, and learning achievement in an asynchronous web-based discussion. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media,12(3), 299-321.
  10. Kim, S. O. (2018). The structural relationship among teaching presence, emotional presence, social presence, cognitive presence and learning flow in flipped learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Konkuk University. Seoul.
  11. Kim, J. J., & Lim, J. Y. (2010). A study on relation between social presence and learning outcome in distance education. Journal of Lifelong Education, 16(1), 1-24.
  12. Kim, J. S. & Kang, M. H. (2010). Structural relationship among teaching presence, learning presence, and effectiveness of e-learning in the corporate setting. Asian Jounal of Education, 11(2), 29-56. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2010.11.2.002
  13. Nam, S. W. (2012). Case studies of smart PBL for the church education of Christian adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyunghee University. Seoul.
  14. Nam, S. W. (2020). The effect of flipped-PBL on the communication and problem solving skills. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 64, 347-368.
  15. Nam, S. W. (2021). A study on the design and development of interactive non-face-to-face real-time classes using edutech : a case study of christian education class. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 66, 343-382.
  16. Park, I. S. (2019). The effect of problem-based learning strategies (PBL) on problem solving skill: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(10), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.10.197
  17. Byeon, S. Y., Chu, S. K., Yoon, H. G. (2022). Analysis of the effect of learners' sense of learning presence for learning performance through online tutoring liberal arts class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(2), 393-406.
  18. Yang, K. H. (2021). A study on "on-tact" Christian education in the post-corona era. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 68, 41-76.
  19. Lee, S. A., Lee, E. C., & Nam, S. W (2019). The effect of flipped-PBL on the self directed learning skills. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 58, 119-146.
  20. Lee, Y. (2011). Investigation in the relationships among learner characteristics, learning strategies, teaching presence, and learning effects in cyber university e-learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea University. Seoul.
  21. Lee, E. C (2013). The effect of group composition according to rapport levels on interaction in online collaborative learning environment. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 57-82.
  22. Lee, E. C (2017). Analysis of effects of learning motivation on the interaction in online cooperation. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(7), 416-424. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.07.416
  23. Joo, Y. J., Ha, Y. J., Yoo, J. W. & Kim, E. K. (2010). The structural relationship among teaching presence, cognitive presence, social presence, and learning outcome in cyber university. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 14(2), 175-187.
  24. Hue, J. P. (2017). The effect of flipped pbl(problem-based learning) on the level of interest and the academic achievement: Focusing on the case of general mathematics class in university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyunghee University. Seoul.
  25. Barrows, H. S., & Myers, A. C. (1993). Problem-based learning in secondary schools. Unpublished manuscript. Springfield, IL:Problem-Based Learning Institute, Lanphier High School, and Southern Illinois University Medical School.
  26. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a textbased environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  27. Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
  28. Kang, M. H., Park, J. U., & Shin, S. Y. (2007). Developing a cognitive presence scale for measuring students' involvement during e-learning process. C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007, 2823-2828. Chesapeake: Va: AACE.
  29. Kang, M. J., Kim, J., & Park, M. (2008). Investigating presence as a predictor of learning outcomes in e-Learning environments. Proceeding of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008, 4175-4180, Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  30. Lee, E. (2022). Exploring the effect of learning motivation type on immersion according to the non-face-to-face teaching method in the major classes for preschool teachers at Christian universities. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 69, 139-162.
  31. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
  32. Swan, K., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Shea, P., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., & Garrison, R. (2008). Researching online communities of inquiry: New CoI survey instrument. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 5812-5820). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  33. Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. Engaged learning with emerging technologies, 225-253.
  34. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686